Platform envelopment

Strategic Management Journal - Tập 32 Số 12 - Trang 1270-1285 - 2011
Thomas R. Eisenmann1, Geoffrey Parker2, Marshall W. Van Alstyne3
1Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
2Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
3School of Management; Boston University; Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

AbstractDue to network effects and switching costs in platform markets, entrants generally must offer revolutionary functionality to win substantial market share. We explore a second entry path that does not rely upon Schumpeterian innovation: platform envelopment. Through envelopment, a provider in one platform market can enter another platform market, and combine its own functionality with that of the target in a multi‐platform bundle that leverages shared user relationships. Envelopers capture market share by foreclosing an incumbent's access to users; in doing so, they harness the network effects that previously had protected the incumbent. We present a typology of envelopment attacks based on whether platform pairs are complements, weak substitutes, or functionally unrelated and we analyze conditions under which these attack types are likely to succeed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/smj.4250140105

10.2307/2234208

10.1287/mnsc.45.12.1613

10.1287/mksc.19.1.63.15182

10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231

10.1177/014920639101700108

Bork R, 1978, The Antitrust Paradox.

10.1007/978-94-011-4407-0_9

10.2307/1593720

10.2307/3087430

10.3386/w11407

10.1287/mnsc.1060.0548

Christensen C, 1997, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail.

10.3386/w8411

10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504

10.1016/0167-7187(96)01015-6

10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E

Eisenmann T, 2007, Managing networked businesses: course overview for educators

10.2307/41166455

Eisenmann T, 2006, Strategies for two‐sided markets, Harvard Business Review, 84, 92

Eisenmann T, 2009, Platforms, Markets and Innovation., 131

10.1162/003355303322552793

10.7551/mitpress/3959.001.0001

Evans D, 2005, Why do firms bundle and tie? Evidence from competitive markets and implications for tying law, Yale Journal on Regulation, 22, 37

10.3386/w8268

Evans D, 2007, The Catalyst Code: The Strategies Behind the World's Most Dynamic Companies.

10.2307/2555589

Fine C, 1998, Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage.

10.2307/3069398

10.1002/smj.4250160919

Gawer A, 2002, Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation.

10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x

Greenstein S, 1997, Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence,, 201

10.2307/2393549

Katz M, 1985, Network externalities, competition, and compatibility, American Economic Review, 75, 424

10.2307/1885068

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1111::AID-SMJ21>3.0.CO;2-W

10.2307/2937852

Nalebuff B, 2000, Incentives, Organization, and Public Economics., 323, 10.1093/oso/9780199242290.003.0017

10.1162/003355304772839551

10.1111/j.1430-9134.2005.00037.x

ParkerG Van AlstyneM.2000.Information complements substitutes and strategic product design. Workshop on Information Systems and Economics Charlotte NC. Available at:http://ssrn.com/abstract = 249585(accessed 10 July 2010).

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400

ParkerG Van AlstyneM.2010.Innovation openness and platform control. Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce. Association for Computing Machinery: New York. Available at:http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1079712 (accessed 10 July 2010).

10.1002/smj.4250140303

10.1002/smj.325

Posner R, 1976, Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective.

10.1162/154247603322493212

10.1086/296654

10.1002/smj.4250171107

10.1086/296250

10.2307/41165984

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<413::AID-SMJ946>3.0.CO;2-C

Thompson J, 1967, Organizations in Action.

10.2307/41165852

10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3

10.1002/smj.4250050207

10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0

Whinston M, 1990, Tying, foreclosure and exclusion, American Economic Review, 80, 837

10.1257/jep.15.2.63

Yoffie D, 1997, Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence,, 1