Lymph Node Evaluation for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Its Value as a Quality Metric

Elsevier BV - Tập 19 - Trang 2162-2170 - 2015
Erin E. Burke1, Schelomo Marmor1,2, Beth A. Virnig2, Todd M. Tuttle1, Eric H. Jensen1
1Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
2School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA

Tóm tắt

Adequate lymph node evaluation (LNE) is recommended for surgically treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma because studies have shown an association between improved survival and adequate LNE. This study aimed to understand the mechanism of this association and determine whether LNE is a valuable quality metric. Using the linked Surveillance Epidemiology End Results Medicare database, we identified patients with surgically treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2000 to 2010. Adequate LNE was defined as evaluation of ≥15 nodes. Survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. We identified 2629 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Overall, 33 % had adequate LNE. Adequate LNE was significantly associated with receipt of postoperative chemotherapy. A significant decrease in hazard of death was associated with adequate LNE (HR 0.86, p < 0.05). Receipt of postoperative chemotherapy was also significantly associated with decreased hazard of death (HR 0.77, p < 0.05). On unadjusted analysis, the survival benefit associated with adequate LNE was lost when stratified by receipt of postoperative chemotherapy. The survival benefit associated with LNE is in part derived from the fact that patients who receive adequate LNE are also more likely to receive chemotherapy. Thus, the use of lymph node counts has limitations as a quality metric.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Pancreas Cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html. Updated 2014. Accessed February, 12, 2015. Gleisner AL, Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Time-related changes in the prognostic significance of the total number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative pancreatic head cancer. J Surg Oncol 2014;110(7):858–863. Govindarajan A, Tan JC, Baxter NN, Coburn NG, Law CH. Variations in surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(1):175–185. Hellan M, Sun CL, Artinyan A, Mojica-Manosa P, Bhatia S, Ellenhorn JD, Kim J. The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2008;37(1):19–24. Huebner M, Kendrick M, Reid-Lombardo KM, Que F, Therneau T, Qin R, Donohue J, Nagorney D, Farnell M, Sarr M. Number of lymph nodes evaluated: prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16(5):920–926. Mellon EA, Springett GM, Hoffe SE, Hodul P, Malafa MP, Meredith KL, Fulp WJ, Zhao X, Shridhar R. Adjuvant radiotherapy and lymph node dissection in pancreatic cancer treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Cancer 2014;120(8):1171–1177. Opfermann KJ, Wahlquist AE, Garrett-Mayer E, Shridhar R, Cannick L, Marshall DT. Adjuvant radiotherapy and lymph node status for pancreatic cancer: results of a study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry Data. Am J Clin Oncol 2014;37(2):112–116. Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(9):1189–1200. Slidell MB, Chang DC, Cameron JL, Wolfgang C, Herman JM, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Pawlik TM. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(1):165–174. Valsangkar NP, Bush DM, Michaelson JS, Ferrone CR, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Thayer SP. N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2013;17(2):257–266. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (Version 2.2015). http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf Updated March 2015. Accessed April 30, 2015. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. http://seer.cancer.gov. Updated 2015. Accessed February 10, 2015. SEER-Medicare linked database. http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/seermedicare/ Updated 2015. Accessed February 10, 2015. Parsons HM, Tuttle TM, Kuntz KM, Begun JW, McGovern PM, Virnig BA. Quality of care along the cancer continuum: does receiving adequate lymph node evaluation for colon cancer lead to comprehensive postsurgical care? J Am Coll Surg 2012;215(3):400–411. Marmor S, Burke EE, Portschy PR, Virnig BA, Tuttle, TM, Jensen EH. Evaluation of Lymph Nodes in the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: Are we Improving the Quality of Care? Surgical Oncology. In Press 2015.