Dilemmas of Leadership and Capacity Building in a Research–Practice Partnership

Teachers College Record - Tập 122 Số 9 - Trang 1-30 - 2020
Dana Vedder‐Weiss1, Adam Lefstein1, Aliza Segal1, Itay Pollak1
1Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

Tóm tắt

Background Research–practice partnerships (RPPs) are proliferating in education, generating increasing interest and posing many challenges. In this study, we shed light on the challenge of supporting practitioners> leadership and building capacity in an RPP. In the RPP literature, practitioner leadership is often highlighted as both a way to improve design development and enactment and as imperative for capacity building and sustainability. However, cultivating leadership also creates challenges which have not yet been adequately explored. Purpose We explore these challenges and related dilemmas in a large-scale Israeli RPP designed to cultivate teacher leadership and build district capacity. We investigate how local actors asserted their leadership, the resources they drew upon, and the dilemmas this posed for us as researchers in an RPP. We critically reflect on how we addressed these dilemmas, and the consequences and implications of our courses of action. Setting This study explores our partnership with two large Israeli districts, as part of a state-wide professional development reform supported by the Ministry of Education and a philanthropic foundation. The partnership aims to support teachers> collaborative, reflective inquiry on teaching and learning, in weekly in-school meetings facilitated by in-school leading teacher. The partnership began six years ago and currently includes 158 schools (458 leading teachers). Research Design We use linguistic ethnographic methods to analyze leadership assertion in three focal cases, representing three different leadership roles, at different levels of the system: (1) a leading teacher demonstrating creative non-compliance in the team meetings she facilitated, (2) a coach exercising her voice and authority in her professional development workshops, (3) and a district manager independently shaping structures. Data Collection Data were collected during the first three years of the RPP, including (participant) observations, audio-recordings, and field notes of in-school meetings, professional development workshops, interviews, and informal conversations. Findings and Conclusions The analysis shows that leadership assertion played an important role in constructing actors’ identities as competent leaders but posed dilemmas for us, such as how to acknowledge leaders> expertise while also maintaining program integrity. The case studies underscore the difficulties involved in managing a partnership in a large-scale educational intervention and the challenges to maintaining productive dialogue with different partners. The paper advances our understanding of the complexities involved in supporting leadership at different levels of the system, in day-to-day interaction, and at multiple micro and macro contexts in which it unfolds, in particular in a large-scale RPP.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.3102/0013189X11428813

10.1017/CBO9780511596605.002

10.3102/0013189X032009003

10.1086/657654

10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368633

10.1086/685847

10.3102/0013189X16631750

Coburn C. E., 2013, Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts

10.1086/518487

Cohen-Vogel L., 2018, Journal of Research on Organization in Education, 2, 1

10.1177/0895904814560886

10.1177/0895904810386586

10.1111/1467-9620.00179

Farrell C. C., Davidson K. L., Repko-Erwin M. E., Penuel W. R., Quantz M., Wong … (2018). A descriptive study of the IES researcher–practitioner partnerships in education research program: Final report (Technical Report No. 3). National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.

10.1177/2332858419849595

10.1177/001316102237669

10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3

Frost D., 2006, Leading & Managing, 12, 19

10.1177/0895904804270777

10.1177/0263211X000283006

Hargreaves A., 2011, The far side of educational reform

10.1080/1363243032000112801

10.1108/09578230810863253

10.1108/09578231111174785

10.1177/0031721716677258

Holland D., 1998, Identity and agency in cultural worlds

10.1177/016146811311501405

10.1177/0013161X06290646

10.3102/0002831209345158

Johnson S. M., 2014, Teachers College Record, 116, 1, 10.1177/016146811411601005

10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_122-1

10.1086/505057

10.1080/00405849609543724

10.1177/016146811311501403

10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.010

10.3102/0013189X20922998

McDonald J. P., 2007, The power of protocols: An educator's guide to better practice

10.1017/CBO9781107707221.008

McKenney S., 2018, International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (1-14)

McLaughlin M. W., 2004, The Curriculum Studies Reader, 171

Meier D., 1995, The Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 369

10.1177/0013161X07309469

10.1177/0895904800014001009

10.1177/0013161X95031002004

10.1080/10749039.2014.884137

10.1177/016146811311501404

10.3102/0013189X11421826

10.1142/S1793206807000300

10.1057/9781137035035_2

10.1177/00131610021969047

Roderick M., 2007, The Consortium on Chicago School Research

10.1080/10824669.2014.988335

10.1177/0013161X11417432

10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.018

10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541

10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.01.006

10.1080/00131720508984678

10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8

10.1177/1741143214558576

10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.002

10.1177/0022487119841895