Ant–plant interaction in the Neotropical savanna: direct beneficial effects of extrafloral nectar on ant colony fitness
Tóm tắt
Current evidence suggests that ant–plant relationships may influence species composition, abundance, and interactions at the community scale. The main resource that plants offer to ants is extrafloral nectar (EFN) and the major part of published studies shown benefits from ants to plants possessing EFNs. However, the complementary question of whether and how ants benefit from EFNs is rarely addressed. Here, we present the results of a long-term study to demonstrate whether EFN has a positive effect on ant colony fitness. We quantified colony growth rate, survival and the final weight of individuals as measures of benefit derived from EFN. Our results provide clear evidence that EFN can have a significant positive impact on the survivorship, growth and reproduction of the Myrmicinae Cephalotes pusillus. In fact, a diet rich in EFN (providing at least 30 cal per day) resulted in five times more individuals per colony, greater body weights, and more eggs. These results have shed new light on the relationships between ants and EFN-bearing plants such as in tropical and temperate systems. The ant C. pusillus is the first case in which we have firm evidence that EFN improves colony growth and development, corroborating more than 100 years of experimental evidence of benefits to plants in these widespread relationships.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Entomol 53:229–232
Blüthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitia W, Jaffe K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W (2000) How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125:229–240
Blüthgen N, Gottsberger G, Fiedler K (2004a) Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Austral Ecol 29:418–429
Blüthgen N, Stork NE, Fiedler K (2004b) Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos 27:344–358
Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Anderson KE, Blanchette CA (2005) What determines the strength of a trophic cascade? Ecology 86:528–537
Bronstein JL (1998) The contribution of ant–plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica 30:150–161
Byk J, Del-Claro K (2010) Nectar- and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: a new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities. Acta Ethol 13:33–38
Clement LW, Köppen SCW, Brand WA, Heil M (2008) Strategies of a parasite of the ant–Acacia mutualism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:953–962
Cushman JH, Beattie A (1991) Mutalisms: assessing the benefits to hosts and visitors. Trends Ecol Evol 6:193–195
Cushman JH, Rashbrook VK, Beattie AJ (1994) Assessing benefits to both participants in a Lycaenid–ant association. Ecology 75:1031–1041
Dafni A (1992) Pollination ecology: a practical approach (the practical approach series). Oxford University Press, New York
Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol Entomol 23:484–490
Davidson DW, Cook SC, Snelling RR (2003) Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300:969–972
Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (2000) Conditional outcomes in a neotropical treehopper–ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity. Oecologia 124:156–165
Del-Claro K, Santos JC, Júnior ADS (2002) Etograma da formiga arborícola Cephalotes pusillus (Klug, 1824) (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Rev Etol 4:31–40 (in Portuguese with English abstract)
Fiedler KL, Saam C (1995) Ants benefit from attending facultatively myrmecophilous Lycaenidae caterpillars: evidence from a survival study. Oecologia 104:316–322
Fokuhl G, Heinze J, Poschlod P (2007) Colony growth in Myrmica rubra with supplementation of myrmecochorous seeds. Ecol Res 22:845–847
Gammans N, Bullock JM, Schonhogge K (2005) Ants benefit in a seed dispersal mutualism. Oecologia 146:43–49
González-Teuber M, Heil M (2009) Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters. Plant Sign Behav 4:809–813
Heil M, McKey D (2003) Protective ant–plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:425–453
Heil M, Fiala B, Baumann B, Linsenmair KE (2000) Temporal, spatial and biotic variations in extrafloral nectar secretion by Macaranga tanarius. Funct Ecol 14:749–757
Heil M, Koch T, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Boland W, Lisenmair KE (2001) Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1083–1088
Irwin HS, Barneby R (1982) The American Cassinae A synoptical revision of Leguminosae tribe Cassieae subtribe Cassinae in The New World. Mem New York Bot Gard 35:1–918
Janzen DH (1975) Pseudomyrmex nigropilosa: a parasite of a mutualism. Science 188:936–937
Kearns CA, Inouye D (1993) Techniques for pollinations biologists. Colorado University Press, Niwot
Keeler KH (1978) Insects feeding at extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae). Entomol News 89:163–168
Koptur S (1992) Extrafloral nectary mediated interactions between insects and plants. In: Bernays E (ed) Insect–plant interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–129
Korndörfer AP, Del-Claro K (2006) Ant defense versus induced defense in Lafoensia pacari (Lythraceae), a myrmecophilous tree of the Brazilian cerrado. Biotropica 38:786–788
Lach L, Hobbs ER, Majer EJD (2009) Herbivory-induced extrafloral nectar increases native and invasive ant worker survival. Popul Ecol 51:237–243
Letorneau DK (1990) Code of ant–plant mutualism broken by parasite. Science 248:215–217
Morales MA, Heithaus ER (1998) Food from seed-dispersal mutualism shifts sex ratios in colonies of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Ecology 79:734–739
Nascimento EA, Del-Claro K (2010) Ant visitation to extrafloral nectaries decreases herbivory and increases fruit set in Chamaecrista debilis (Fabaceae) in a Neotropical savanna. Flora. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.040
O’Dowd DJ, Catchpole EA (1983) Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichrysum spp.–ant interactions. Oecologia 59:191–200
Ohgushi T (2008) Herbivore-induced indirect interaction webs on terrestrial plants: the importance of non-trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions. Entomol Exp App 128:217–229
Powell S (2008) Ecological specialization and the evolution of a specialized caste in Cephalotes ants. Funct Ecol 22:902–911
Pulice CE, Packer AA (2008) Simulated herbivory induces extrafloral nectar production in Prunus avium. Funct Ecol 22:801–807
Rashbrook VK, Compton SG, Lawton JH (1992) Ant–herbivore interactions: reasons for the absence of benefits to a fern with foliar nectaries. Ecology 73:2167–2174
Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant–plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rico-Gray V, Palacios-Rios M, Garcia-Franco JG, Mackay WP (1998) Richness and seasonal variation of ant–plant associations mediated by plant-derived food resources in the semiarid Zapotitlan Valley, Mexico. Am Mid Nat 140:21–26
Rosumek FB, Silveira FAO, Neves FS, Barbosa NP, Diniz L, Oki Y, Pezzini F, Fernandes GW, Cornelissen T (2009) Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia 160:537–549
Rudgers JA, Gardner MC (2004) Extrafloral nectar as a resource mediating multispecies interactions. Ecology 85:1495–1502
Rutter MT, Rausher MD (2004) Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution 58:2657–2668
Sachs JL, Simms EL (2006) Pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends Ecol Evol 21:585–592
Sendoya SF, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2009) Egg-laying butterflies distinguish predaceous ants by sight. Am Nat 174:134–140
Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919
Thompson JN (2005) The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago