Muscle force recruitment and biomechanical modeling: An analysis of masseter muscle function during mastication in Macaca fascicularis

Wiley - Tập 88 Số 3 - Trang 365-387 - 1992
William L. Hylander1, Kirk R. Johnson1, A. W. Crompton2
1Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
2Department of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe main purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that as subjects chew with increasing levels of force, the ratio of the working‐ to balancing‐side jaw‐muscle force (W/B) decreases and begins to approach 1.0. We did this by analyzing relative masseter force in Macaca fascicularis using both strain gage and surface electromyographic (EMG) techniques. In addition, we also analyzed: 1) the relationship between jaw position using cineradiographic techniques and relative masseter force, 2) the timing differences between relative masseter force from the working and balancing sides, and 3) the loading and unloading characteristics of the masseter muscle.Our findings indicate that when macaques increase the amount of overall masticatory force during chewing, the W/B ratio for masseter force frequently (but not always) decreases and begins to approach 1.0. Therefore, our working hypothesis is not completely supported because the W/B ratio does not decrease with increasing levels of force in all subjects. The data also demonstrate timing differences in masseter force. During apple‐skin mastication, the average peak masseter force on the working side occurs immediately at or slightly after the initial occurrence of maximum intercuspatiori, whereas the average peak masseter force on the balancing side occurs well before maximum intercuspation. On average, we found that peak force from the balancing‐side masseter precedes the working‐side masseter by about 26 msec. The greater the asynchrony between working‐ and balancing‐side masseter force, the greater the difference in the relative magnitude of these forces. For example, in the subject with the greatest asynchrony, the balancing‐side masseter had already fallen to about one‐half of peak force when the working‐side masseter reached peak force.Our data also indicate that the loading and unloading characteristics of the masseter differ between the working and balancing sides. Loading (from 50 to 100% of peak force) and unloading (from 100 to 50% of peak force) for the balancing‐side masseter tends to be rather symmetrical. In contrast, the working‐side masseter takes much longer to load from 50 to 100% of peak force than it does to unload from 100 to 50% of peak force. Finally, it takes on average about 35 msec for the working‐side zygoma and 42 msec for the balancing‐side zygoma to unload from 100 to 50% of peak force during apple‐skin mastication, indicating that the unloading characteristics of the macaque masseter during mastication closely approximates its relaxation characteristics (as determined by muscle stimulation). © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahlgren J, 1966, Mechanism of mastication: A quantitative cinematographic and electromyographic study of masticatory movements in children, with special reference to occlusion of the teeth, Acta Odontol. Scand., 24, 1

10.1038/scientificamerican0771-86

Bouisset S, 1973, New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 547

10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80027-7

Connolly R, 1978, Acepromazine‐ketamine anesthesia in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta), Lab. Anim. Sci., 28, 72

Crompton AW, 1986, The Ecology and Biology of Mammal‐Like Reptiles, 263

Dally JW, 1965, Experimental Stress Analysis

10.1002/ajpa.1330830211

10.1007/978-1-4757-1682-5

10.1016/0021-9290(87)90329-0

10.1002/ajpa.1330430209

10.1002/ajpa.1330510317

10.1002/jmor.1051590208

Hylander WL, 1983, Mechanical properties of food and recruitment of masseter force, J. Dent. Res., 62, 297

10.1002/ajpa.1330640102

Hylander WL, 1985, Developmental Aspects of Temporomandibular Joint Disorder, 19

10.1093/icb/25.2.315

10.1016/0003-9969(86)90120-2

Hylander WL, 1992, The Temporomandibular Joint: A Biological Basis for Clinical Practice, 60

10.1016/0003-9969(86)90139-1

10.1007/BF02745501

10.1016/0003-9969(89)90078-2

10.1002/ajpa.1330720304

KayRF(1973)Mastication molar tooth structure and diet in primates. Ph.D. Thesis New Haven CT: Yale University.

Kay RF, 1978, The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores, 173

10.1002/ar.1091930306

Moller E, 1966, The chewing apparatus: An electromyoraphic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology, Acta Physiol. Scand., 69, 1

10.1016/0021-9290(85)90014-4

Picq PG, 1983, Thèse de 3e Cycle

Picq PG, 1990, L'Articulation Temporo‐mandibulaire des Hominidés: Bioméchnique, Allométrie, Anatomie Comparée et Evolution. Editions

10.1016/0047-2484(91)90042-T

Rensberger JM, 1973, Sanctimus (Mammalia, Robentia) and the phyletic relationships of the large arikareean geomyoids, J. Paleontol., 47, 835

10.1002/jmor.1051670308

10.1002/ajpa.1330490307

10.1002/jmor.1051730203

10.1177/00220345860650080201

Sokal RR, 1981, Biometry

10.1016/0021-9290(85)90280-5

10.1016/0021-9290(90)90303-K