Institutional Allocation in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical Evidence

Journal of Finance - Tập 57 Số 3 - Trang 1421-1442 - 2002
Reena Aggarwal1,2,3, Nagpurnanand Prabhala1,2,3, Manju Puri1,2,3
1College Park, MD 20742 Stanford, CA 94505
2NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138
3School of Business Smith School of Business Stanford University Georgetown University University of Maryland Graduate School of Business Washington, DC 20057 4427 Van Munching Hall 518 Memorial Way

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTWe analyze institutional allocation in initial public offerings (IPOs) using a new data set of U.S. offerings between 1997 and 1998. We document a positive relationship between institutional allocation and day one IPO returns. This is partly explained by the practice of giving institutions more shares in IPOs with strong premarket demand, consistent with book‐building theories. However, institutional allocation also contains private information about first‐day IPO returns not reflected in premarket demand and other public information. Our evidence supports book‐building theories of IPO underpricing, but suggests that institutional allocation in underpriced issues is in excess of that explained by book‐building alone.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/0022-1082.00241

Reena Aggarwal, 2001, Allocation of initial public offerings and flipping activity, Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming

10.1016/0304-405X(86)90055-3

10.1016/0304-405X(89)90051-2

Richard Carter, 1990, Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation, Journal of Finance, 45, 1045, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02426.x

10.1111/0022-1082.00242

10.1111/0022-1082.00407

10.1111/0022-1082.00240

Gasparino C., 2000, SEC targets IPO process with probes, Wall Street Journal

10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00201-8

10.1093/rfs/14.2.433

10.1016/0304-405X(93)90019-8

10.1016/0304-405X(94)00797-5

10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00089-1

10.1016/0304-405X(93)90016-5

Alexander Ljungqvist, 2001, IPO allocations: Discriminatory or discretionary?, Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming

10.1093/rfs/3.3.431

10.1093/rfs/15.2.413

10.1016/0927-538X(94)90016-7

10.1111/1540-6261.00458

10.1017/CBO9780511810176

Maksimovic Vojislav andPegaretPichler 2001 Private versus public offerings: Optimal selling mechanisms Working paper University of Maryland.

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03770.x

10.1093/rfs/7.2.279

10.2307/1391724

Pulliam S., 2000, Linux deal is focus of IPO commission probe, Wall Street Journal

Pulliam S., 2000, SEC intensifies inquiry into commissions for hot IPOs, Wall Street Journal

Ritter Jay, 1998, Initial public offerings, Contemporary Finance Digest, 2, 5

10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1

Smith R., 2000, U.S. probes inflated commissions for hot IPOs, Wall Street Journal

Smith R., 2001, CSFB and employees may face NASD charges over IPO sales, Wall Street Journal

10.2307/1912934