Vision and Embodied Knowing: The Making of Floral Design
Tóm tắt
This article focuses on assessment actions in floristry education, addressing how interaction with flowers influences and mediates vocational knowing. Using video recordings from floristry education for adults, the article explores the interaction between teacher and student when assessing on-going work and performance as a way to frame the teacher’s seeing in situ. Influenced by conversation analysis and moment-by-moment methods ─ including talk, gestures, and flowers as resources ─ the findings contribute to a holistic perspective on vocational floristry knowing. Different features of vocational floristry knowing are detected as part of the content in assessment actions: (i) aesthetic standards reflected in suggestions made by the teacher and student, (ii) financial awareness as a way of seeing flowers, and (iii) the use of context and change of perspective to take the customer into account. The findings demonstrate situated floristry knowing in action, which is displayed when the teacher enables the student to visualise and understand professional vision of flowers, traditions, and standards.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon: Presses du réel.
Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Non-verbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook on interpersonal communication (pp. 229–285). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Carlgren, I. (2009). Kunskapssynen i 90-talets läroplanskonstruktion. In I. Carlgren (Ed.), Perspektiv på den svenska skolans kunskapsdiskussion (pp. 16–38). Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.
Carlgren, I. (2011). Kunnande-kunskap-kunnighet. In L. Lindström, V. Lindberg & A. Petttersson (Eds.), Pedagogisk bedömning. Att dokumentera, bedöma och utveckla kunskap (pp. 43–58). HLS förlag.
Danius, S., Sjöholm, C., & Wallenstein, S. (Eds.). (2012). Aisthesis: Estetikens historia. D. 1. Stockholm: Thales.
Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
Dormer, P. (1994). The art of the maker. London: Thames and Hudson.
Filliettaz, L. (2010). Interactions and miscommunication in Swiss vocational education context: researching vocational learning from a linguistic perspective. Journal of Applied Linguistic and Professional Practice, 7(1), 27–50.
Fine, G. A. (1985). Occupational aesthetics: how trade school students learn to cook. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 14(3), 3–31.
Fine, G. A. (1992). The culture of production: aesthetic choices and constraints in culinary work. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1268–1294.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Goody, J. (1993). The culture of flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grasseni, C. (2009a). Good looking: Learning to be a cattle breeder. In C. Grasseni (Ed.), Skilled vision: Between apprenticeship and standards (pp. 47–65). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Grasseni, C. (2009b). Developing Skill, Developing Vision. Practices of Locality at the foot of the Alps. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Have, P. T. (2007). Doing conversation analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P., & Dunne, S. (2011). Exhibiting understanding: the body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 489–503.
Horowitz, A. (2013). On looking: Eleven walks with expert eyes. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1998). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2011). Promises and problems of teaching with popular culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 4(1), 40–69.
Lindberg, V., & Löfgren, R. (2011). Bedömningshandlingar i två klassrum. Likartat kemiinnehåll med skilda inramningar. In Innehållet i fokus - kemiundervisning i finlandssvenska klassrum (pp. 238−274). Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.
Lindwall, A., Lymer, G., & Ivarsson, J. (2008). Att ge och ta kritik: Examination i arkitektutbildning som hybrid aktivitet. In Kunskapande, kommunikation och bedömning i gestaltande utbildning (pp. 199–211). Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.
Lymer, G. (2009). Demonstrating professional vision: the work of critique in architectural education. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16(2), 145–171.
Mondada, L. (2011). The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. D. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, K. (2004). Imagination as joint activity: the case of architectural interaction. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(4), 267–278.
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (1997). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polanyi, M. (2004 [1962]). Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (2009[1966]). The tacit dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.
Rancière, J. (2008). Deleuze och estetikens bestämning. In H. Mattsson & S. Wallenstein (Eds.), Deleuze och mångfaldens veck (pp. 93–112). Axl Books: Stockholm.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 191–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8(2), 65–187.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. D. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tin, M. B. (2011). Spilleregler og spillerom: Tradisjonens estetikk. Oslo: Novus.
Willerslev, R. (2009). ‘To have the world at a distance’: Reconsidering the significance of vison for social antroplogy. In C. Grasseni (Ed.), Skilled vision: Between apprenticeship and standards (pp. 23–46). Oxford: Berghahn Books.