Scenario analysis of ecosystem service changes and interactions in a mountain-oasis-desert system: a case study in Altay Prefecture, China
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bennett, E. M. et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 76–85 (2015).
Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’ s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).
Daily, G. C. Ecology: The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value. Science (80-.) 289, 395–396 (2000).
Bateman, I. J. et al. Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom. Science (80-.) 341, 45–50 (2013).
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. & Willemen, L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 7, 260–272 (2010).
Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August - December 2012. Rep. to Eur. Environ. Agency, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10650 (2013).
Costanza, R. et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 1–16 (2017).
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D. & Levitt, E. A. Looking to the future of ecosystem services. Ecosystems 8, 125–132 (2005).
Xie, W., Huang, Q., He, C. & Zhao, X. Projecting the impacts of urban expansion on simultaneous losses of ecosystem services: A case study in Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 84, 183–193 (2018).
Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D. & Johnson, K. A. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: A case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48, 219–242 (2011).
Le Maitre, D. C. et al. Linking ecosystem services and water resources: Landscape-scale hydrology of the Little Karoo. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5, 261–270 (2007).
Millennium Ecosystem Assessmen (MEA). Ecosystems and Human Well- Being: Synthesis. (Island Press, 2005).
Hao, R., Yu, D. & Wu, J. Relationship between paired ecosystem services in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China using the constraint line method. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 240, 171–181 (2017).
Rodríguez, J. P. et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 11 (2006).
Qiu, J. & Turner, M. G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 12149–12154 (2013).
Deng, X., Li, Z. & Gibson, J. A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. J. Geogr. Sci. 26, 953–968 (2016).
Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Comín, F. A. & Bennett, E. M. Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecol. Soc. 19 (2014).
Lee, H. & Lautenbach, S. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 66, 340–351 (2016).
Yang, G. et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 136, 110–121 (2015).
Hou, Y., Lü, Y., Chen, W. & Fu, B. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of ecosystem service interactions: a case study on the central Loess Plateau of China. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 1201–1217 (2017).
Butler, J. R. A. et al. An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 180, 176–191 (2013).
Sun, X., Lu, Z., Li, F. & Crittenden, J. C. Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-o ff s to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 94, 117–129 (2018).
Castro, A. J. et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 132, 102–110 (2014).
Wang, Z. et al. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992–2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China. Sci. Total Environ. 514, 119–130 (2015).
Lü, Y. et al. A policy-driven large scale ecological restoration: Quantifying ecosystem services changes in the loess plateau of China. Plos One 7, 1–10 (2012).
Hou, Y., Burkhard, B. & Muller, F. Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 127, S117–S131 (2013).
Egoh, B. et al. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 127, 135–140 (2008).
Willemen, L., Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M. E. F. & Verburg, P. H. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecol. Indic. 10, 62–73 (2010).
Jia, X. et al. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China. Ecol. Indic. 43, 103–111 (2014).
Jopke, C., Kreyling, J., Maes, J. & Koellner, T. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecol. Indic. 49, 46–52 (2015).
Renard, D., Rhemtulla, J. M. & Bennett, E. M. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 13411–13416 (2015).
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D. & Bennett, E. M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 5242–5247 (2010).
Alcamo, J. et al. Changes in nature’s balance sheet: Model-based estimates of future worldwide ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 10 (2005).
Nelson, E. et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 4–11 (2009).
Kirchner, M. et al. Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies. Ecol. Econ. 109, 161–174 (2015).
Harmáčková, Z. V. & Vačkář, D. Modelling regulating ecosystem services trade-offs across landscape scenarios in Třeboňsko Wetlands Biosphere Reserve, Czech Republic. Ecol. Modell. 295, 207–215 (2015).
Bai, Y., Zheng, H., Ouyang, Z., Zhuang, C. & Jiang, B. Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: A case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 70, 709–718 (2013).
Zheng, H. et al. Using ecosystem service trade-offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 527–532 (2016).
Li, B. & Wang, W. Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China. Ecol. Indic. 84, 837–846 (2018).
van Jaarsveld, A. S. et al. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 425–441 (2005).
Lauf, S., Haase, D. & Kleinschmit, B. Linkages between ecosystem services provisioning, urban growth and shrinkage - A modeling approach assessing ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecol. Indic. 42, 73–94 (2014).
Fu, Q., Li, B., Yang, L., Wu, Z. & Zhang, X. Ecosystem services evaluation and its spatial characteristics in Central Asia’s arid regions: A case study in Altay Prefecture, China. Sustain. 7, 8335–8353 (2015).
Egarter Vigl, L., Schirpke, U., Tasser, E. & Tappeiner, U. Linking long-term landscape dynamics to the multiple interactions among ecosystem services in the European Alps. Landsc. Ecol. 31, 1903–1918 (2016).
Li, Y. et al. Spatially explicit quantification of the interactions among ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 1181–1199 (2017).
Zhang, X. Ecological restoration and sustainable agricultural paradigm of Mountain-Oasis-Ecotone-Desert system in the north of the Tianshan mountains. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 43, 1294–1299 (2001).
Bogdan, S.-M., Pătru-Stupariu, I. & Zaharia, L. The Assessment of Regulatory Ecosystem Services: The Case of the Sediment Retention Service in a Mountain Landscape in the Southern Romanian Carpathians. Procedia Environ. Sci. 32, 12–27 (2016).
Egarter Vigl, L., Depellegrin, D., Pereira, P., de Groot, R. & Tappeiner, U. Mapping the ecosystem service delivery chain: Capacity, flow, and demand pertaining to aesthetic experiences in mountain landscapes. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 422–436 (2017).
Sawut, M., Eziz, M. & Tiyip, T. The effects of land-use change on ecosystem service value of desert oasis: a case study in Ugan-Kuqa River Delta Oasis, China. Can. J. Soil Sci. 93, 99–108 (2013).
Liang, Y. & Liu, L. An integrated ecosystem service assessment in an artificial desert oasis of northwestern China. J. Land Use Sci. 12, 154–167 (2017).
Cuni-Sanchez, A., Pfeifer, M., Marchant, R. & Burgess, N. D. Ethnic and locational differences in ecosystem service values: Insights from the communities in forest islands in the desert. Ecosyst. Serv. 19, 42–50 (2016).
O’Farrell, P. J. et al. The possibilities and pitfalls presented by a pragmatic approach to ecosystem service valuation in an arid biodiversity hotspot. J. Arid Environ. 75, 612–623 (2011).
Liu, X. et al. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landsc. Urban Plan. 168, 94–116 (2017).
Fu, Q., Li, B., Hou, Y., Bi, X. & Zhang, X. Science of the Total Environment Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia’ s arid regions: A case study in Altay Prefecture. China. 608, 633–646 (2017).
Akuja, T., Avni, Y., Zaady, E. & Gutterman, Y. Soil erosion effects as indicators of desertification processes in the northern Negev Desert. Soil Eros. Res. 21st Century, Proc., 595–598 (2001).
Liu, Z., Verburg, P. H., Wu, J. & He, C. Understanding Land System Change Through Scenario-Based Simulations: A Case Study from the Drylands in Northern China. Environ. Manage. 59, 440–454 (2017).
Raudsepp-Hearne, C. & Peterson, G. D. Scale and ecosystem services: how do observation, management, and analysis shift with scale—lessons from Québec. Ecol. Soc. 21 (2016).
Haase, D., Schwarz, N., Strohbach, M., Kroll, F. & Seppelt, R. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrated multiscale framework applied to the leipzig-halle region, Germany. Ecol. Soc. 17 (2012).
Zobeck, T. M. Abrasion of Crusted Soils: Influence of Abrader Flux and Soil Properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1091 (1991).
Fu, B. et al. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecol. Complex. 8, 284–293 (2011).
Hao, R. et al. Impacts of changes in climate and landscape pattern on ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 579, 718–728 (2016).
Xiao, Q., Hu, D. & Xiao, Y. Assessing changes in soil conservation ecosystem services and causal factors in the Three Gorges Reservoir region of China. J. Clean. Prod., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.012 (2016).
Jobbágy, E. G. & Jackson, R. B. Groundwater use and salinization with grassland afforestration. Glob. Chang. Biol. 10, 1299–1312 (2004).
Tong, S., Zhang, J., Hasi & Ma, Q. 14 Years Spatial-temporal Distribution Characteristics of Evapotranspiration in Xilingol Grassland Based on MOD16. Chinese J. Grassl. 38, 83–91 (2016).
Zheng, H. W., Shen, G. Q., Wang, H. & Hong, J. Simulating land use change in urban renewal areas: A case study in Hong Kong. Habitat Int. 46, 23–34 (2015).
Wu, M., Ren, X., Che, Y. & Yang, K. A Coupled SD and CLUE-S Model for Exploring the Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study in Baoshan District, Shanghai, China. Environ. Manage. 56, 402–419 (2015).
Jiang, W., Deng, Y., Tang, Z., Lei, X. & Chen, Z. Modelling the potential impacts of urban ecosystem changes on carbon storage under different scenarios by linking the CLUE-S and the InVEST models. Ecol. Modell. 345, 30–40 (2017).
Hu, Y., Zheng, Y. & Zheng, X. Simulation of land-use scenarios for Beijing using CLUE-S and Markov composite models. Chinese Geogr. Sci. 23, 92–100 (2013).
Zhang, H., Liao, X. & Zhai, T. Evaluation of ecosystem service based on scenario simulation of land use in Yunnan Province. Phys. Chem. Earth 104, 58–65 (2018).
Lu, R. et al. Land Use Scenarios Simulation Based on CLUE-S and Markov Composite Model—A Case Study of Taihu Lake Rim in Jiangsu Province. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 29, 576–580 (2009).
Ma, L., Niu, S. & Yang, L. Scenarios simulation of land use/cover pattern in Dunhuang City,Gansu Province of Northwest China based on Markov and CLUE-S integrated model. Chinese J. Ecol. 31, 1823–1831 (2012).
Pontius, R. G. Jr., Cornell, J. D. & Hall, C. A. S. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 85, 191–203 (2001).
Sharp, E. R. et al. InVEST+ VERSION+ User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund., 2015.
Hu, H., Fu, B., Lü, Y. & Zheng, Z. SAORES: a spatially explicit assessment and optimization tool for regional ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 547–560 (2015).
Zheng, Z., Fu, B., Hu, H. & Sun, G. A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: a case study on Yanhe Basin, China. Landsc. Ecol. 29, 1689–1696 (2014).
Wang, B., Tang, H. & Xu, Y. Integrating ecosystem services and human well-being into management practices: Insights from a mountain-basin area, China. Ecosyst. Serv. 27, 58–69 (2017).
Hall, L. J. S. & Foster, G. R. The revised universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 83–104 (1994).
Guo, Z., Zobeck, T. M., Stout, J. E. & Zhang, K. The effect of wind averaging time on wind erosivity estimation. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 37, 797–802 (2012).
Fryrear, D. W. et al. RWEQ: Improved wind erosion technology. J. Soil Water Conserv. 55, 183–189 (2000).
Van Pelt, R. S., Zobeck, T. M., Potter, K. N., Stout, J. E. & Popham, T. W. Validation of the wind erosion stochastic simulator (WESS) and the revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ) for single events. Environ. Model. Softw. 19, 191–198 (2004).