Testing the Value of Six Taxonomic Groups as Biodiversity Indicators at a Local Scale

Conservation Biology - Tập 18 Số 3 - Trang 667-675 - 2004
Vassiliki Kati1, Pierre Devillers2, Marc Dufrêne3, Anastasios Legakis4, Despoina Vokou5, Philippe Lebrun6
1Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Ioannina, Seferi 2, 30100 Agrinio, Greece, email [email protected]
2Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Section de Biologie de la Conservation, Rue Vautier 29, B‐1000 Brussells
3Ministère de la Région Wallonne, Centre de Recherche de la Nature, des Forêts et du Bois, Avenue Maréchal Juin, 23, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
4Department of Biology, Zoological Museum, University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, 15784 Athens, Greece
5Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, UPB 119, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
6Université catholique de Louvain, Unité d'Écologie et de Biogéographie, Centre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité, Place Croix du Sud, 5, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Tóm tắt

Abstract:  We examined six groups of taxa—woody plants, aquatic and terrestrial herpetofauna, small terrestrial birds, orchids, and Orthoptera—to determine their efficiency as biodiversity indicators in the Dadia Reserve in northern Greece. We investigated the indicator value of each group by examining the degree of congruence of its species‐richness pattern with that of the other groups and the efficiency of its complementary network in conserving the other groups and biodiversity. The two techniques differed in many respects in their outputs, but they both showed woody plants as the best biodiversity indicator. There was in general low congruence in the species richness patterns across the different groups. Significant relationships were found between woody plants and birds, Orthoptera and terrestrial herpetofauna, and birds and aquatic herpetofauna. None of the optimal complementary networks of the groups we examined protected all species of the other groups. Nevertheless, the complementary network of woody plants adequately conserved all groups except orchids. We conclude that the principle of complementarity must be integrated into the methodology of evaluating an indicator. In an applied context, our results provide a scientific background on which to base a biomonitoring program for the Dadia Reserve. In a wider scope, if the group of woody plants prove an adequate biodiversity indicator for other Mediterranean areas as well, this will be important because it will facilitate conservation‐related decisions for the entire Mediterranean region.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adamakopoulos T., 1995, Special environmental study

Bibby C. J., 1992, Bird census techniques

Blondel J., 1999, Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region

Blondel J., 1970, La méthode des indices ponctuels d'abondance (I.P.A.) ou des relevés d' avifauna par stations d' écoute, Alauda, 38, 55

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98338.x

10.1038/35010105

Colwell R. K., 1997, User's guide and application

Crisp P. N., 1998, A case study from New Zealand and implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 209

Crump M. L., 1994, Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians, 84

Delforge P., 1994, Guide des orchidées d' Europe, d' Afrique du nord et du proche‐rient

Devillers P., 1996, A classification of palearctic habitats

10.1126/science.275.5299.550

10.1093/forestry/72.4.313

10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00064-6

Hawksworth D. L., 1995, Global biodiversity assessment, 107

10.1038/28843

Huston M. A., 1994, Biological diversity: the coexistence of species in changing landscapes

10.1023/A:1008900309571

Kati V.2001.Methodological approach to assessing and optimizing the conservation of biodiversity: a case study in Dadia Reserve (Greece).Ph.D. thesis. Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain la Neuve Belgium .

Kati V., 2001, Grasshoppers and crickets of the Dadia Forest Reserve (Thraki, Greece) with a new record to the Greek fauna: Paranocarodes chopardi Pechev 1965 (Orthoptera, Pamphagidae), Articulata, 1, 11

Kati V., 2000, Les Naturalistes Belges, 269

10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00091-0

Kent M., 1994, Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach

Krebs Ch. J., 1989, Ecological methodology

10.1038/34166

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98533.x

Lombard A., 1995, The problem with multi‐species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide, South African Journal of Zoology, 30, 145, 10.1080/02541858.1995.11448382

10.1038/35012251

10.1017/S000632319700515X

Meffe G. K., 1994, Principles of conservation biology, 3

10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x

10.2307/2269394

10.1076/snfe.34.1.59.8918

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98125.x

Pearson D. L., 1995, Biodiversity measurement and estimation, 75

10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96460.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030376.x

10.1016/0006-3207(89)90058-X

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002282.x

Poirazidis K., 2002, Monitoring plan for the protected area of Dadia‐Lefkimi‐Soufli Forest

10.1038/365335a0

10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-I

Reyers B., 2000, Assessment techniques for biodiversity surrogates, South African Journal of Science, 96, 406

10.2307/1313630

10.1016/0006-3207(93)90144-P

SAS Institute, 1995, User's guide: statistics

10.1579/0044-7447-29.3.136

10.1163/156853889X00188

10.1126/science.279.5359.2106

10.1016/0006-3207(91)90030-D

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00198.x

Willemse F., 1985, A key to the Orthoptera species of Greece