Quality uncertainty, brand reliance, and dissipative advertising
Tóm tắt
Consumers may have learned to generalize from usage experiences that nationally advertised, name-brand items tend to be higher in quality than unadvertised brands. Such generalization may have prompted the substitution of brand-name evaluations for search in quality assessments of nondurable experience goods. This paper offers theoretical arguments which suggest that if some consumers do not search, all firms in nondurable, experience goods markets can increase their profits if some substitute dissipative advertising (i.e., advertising which ignores information about product performance characteristics) of brand names for product quality enhancements. Undersearching by consumers invites firms to downgrade value in nondurable, experience goods markets. In support of the hypothesized substitution by consumers of brand-name evaluations for search in nondurable, experience goods markets, this paper reports results of a field experiment in which the influences on quality assessments of brand name and product composition were studied in two categories where dissipative advertising is heavily relied upon. Results suggest that branding is relied upon more heavily than search to assess quality, even when brand cues are inconsistent with actual quality levels and search is costless, suggesting that dissipative advertising can be extremely effective.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allison, R. and P. Uhl. 1964. “Effect of Brand Identification on Perception of Product Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 1: 36–39.
Bellizzi, Joseph A. and Warren S. Martin. 1982. “The Influence of National Versus Generic Branding on Taste Perceptions.”Journal of Business Research 10: 385–396.
Gardner, Burleigh B. and Sidney J. Levy. 1955. “The Product and the Brand.”Harvard Business Review (March/April): 33.
Geistfeld, Loren V. 1982. “The Price-Quality Relationship Revisited.”Journal of Consumer Affairs 16 (Winter): 334–335.
Gerstner, Eitan. 1985. “Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality?”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (May): 209–215.
Hjorth-Anderson, Chr. 1984. “The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (September): 708–718.
Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman. 1982. “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun.”Journal of Consumer Research 9 (September): 132–140.
Jacoby, J., J.C. Olson and R. A. Haddock. 1971. “Price, Brand Name, and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Applied Psychology 55: 570–579. Levy, Sidney J. 1959. “Symbols for Sale.”Harvard Business Review 37 (July–August): 117–124.
Makens, J.C. 1965. “Effect of Brand Preference Upon Consumers’ Perceived Taste of Turkey Meat.”Journal of Applied Psychology 49: 261–263.
Maynes, E. Scott. 1975. “The Concept and Measurement of Product Quality.” InHousehold Production and Consumption. Ed. Nestor E. Terleckyj. New York: Columbia University Press.
Maynes, E. Scott and Terje Assum. 1982. “Informationally Imperfect Consumer Markets: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications.”The Journal of Consumer Affairs 16 (1): 62–87.
Milgrom, Paul and John Roberts. 1986. “Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality.”Journal of Political Economy 94 (4): 796–821.
Morris, Ruby Turner and Claire Sekulski Bronson. 1969. “The Chaos in Competition Indicated by Consumer Reports.”Journal of Marketing 33 (July): 26–43.
Nelson, Phillip. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Political Economy 78: 311–329.
—. 1974. “Advertising as Information.”Journal of Political Economy 82: 729–754.
—. 1978. “Advertising as Information Once More.” InIssues in Advertising: The Economics of Persuasion. Ed. David G. Tuerck. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
Olson, Jerry C. 1977. “Price as an Informational Cue: Effects in Product Evaluation.” InConsumer and Industrial Buying Behavior. Eds. Arch G. Woodside, Jagdish N. Sheth, and Peter D. Bennet. New York: North Holland Publishing Company. Pp. 267–286.
Olson, Jerry C. and Jacob Jacoby. 1972. “Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process.” InProceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research. Ed. M. Venkatesan. Iowa City: Association for Consumer Research. Pp. 167–179.
Oxenfeldt, Alfred R. 1950. “Consumer Knowledge: Its Measurement and Extent.”Review of Economics and Statistics 32: 300–314.
Riesz, Peter C. 1978. “Price Versus Quality in the Marketplace, 1961–1975.”Journal of Retailing 54 (Winter): 15–28.
— 1979. “Price-Quality Correlations for Packaged Food Products.”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 13 (Winter): 236–247.
Scherer, F. M. 1980.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd. ed. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Schmalensee, Richard. 1978. “A Model of Advertising and Product Quality.”Journal of Political Economy 86: 485–503.
Sproles, George B. 1977. “New Evidence on Price and Product Quality.”Journal of Consumer Affairs 11 (Summer): 63–77.
— 1986. “The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets: Issues and Comments.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (June): 146–148.
White, I.S. 1966. “The Perception of Value in Products” InOn Knowing the Consumer. Ed. Joseph Newman. New York: Wiley.
Wiggins, Steven and W.J. Lane. 1983. “Quality Uncertainty, Search, and Advertising.”American Economic Review 73: 881–894.
Wolinsky, Asher. 1983. “Prices as Signals of Product Quality.”Review of Economic Studies 50 (October): 647–658.
Zeithaml, Valarie A. 1988. “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 2–22.