A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services

Emerald - Tập 11 Số 4 - Trang 294-308 - 2006
Eleonora Bottani1, Antonio Rizzi1
1Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy

Tóm tắt

Purpose

To present a multi‐attribute approach for the selection and ranking of the most suitable 3PL service provider.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach is based on the TOPSIS technique (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and the fuzzy set theory.

Findings

A quantitative methodology based on a structured framework, for the selection of the most appropriate 3PL service provider.

Research limitations/implications

Future research may attempt to compare the results of the methodology proposed with those of other Multi Attribute Group Decision Making methods. In particular, the selection tree could be developed in a multi‐tier hierarchy, trying to punctually address the relationships between the upper tier criteria and the lower level ones. With multi‐tier hierarchies, the performance of AHP could be compared with the one obtained with TOPSIS, not only with respect to “technical suitability” but also in terms of easiness to implement, shortcomings and general managerial viability.

Practical implications

From the application of the methodology to a real case, the approach proposed emerges as an appropriate tool, which makes it possible to easily and effectively rank alternatives. Conversely the most critical issue pointed out by the real case application is the preliminary “request of information” phase, which has to be given critical attention. The availability of a well structured body of knowledge about potential candidates emerged as the true discriminant for an effective analysis.

Originality/value

The originality of the paper is threefold: first, an original framework of criteria for the selection of the most suitable 3PL service provider is presented. Second, an original methodology based on a fuzzy TOPSIS approach is presented. Third, the practical implications and drawbacks are discussed by means of a real case application.


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackermann, K. (1996), “Pitfalls in logistics partnership”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 35‐7. Africk, J.M. and Calkins, C.S. (1994), “Does assets ownership means a better service?”, Transportation and Distribution, May, pp. 49‐61. Bowersox, D.J. (1990), “The strategic benefits of logistics alliances”, Harvard Business Review, July‐August, pp. 36‐45. Bowersox, D.J. and Daughtery, P. (1990), Logistical Excellence: It's Not Business as Usual, Digital Press, Burlington, MA. Bradley, P. (1993), “Third party logistics: DuPont takes the plunge”, Purchasing, 3 June, pp. 33‐7. Bradley, P. (1994), “Cozy up but stay tough”, Purchasing, 17 March, pp. 47‐51. Busch, G. (1962), “New twist on supplier evaluation”, Purchasing, No. 55, pp. 102‐3. Chen, C.T. (2000), “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision‐making under fuzzy environment”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 114, pp. 1‐9. Chen, S.J. and Hwang, C.L. (1992), Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin. Choi, T.Y. and Hartley, J.L. (1996), “An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 14, pp. 333‐43. Christopher, M. (1998), Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Blackwell Publishing, London. Dapiran, P., Millen, R., Lieb, R. and Sohal, A. (1996), “Third party logistics services usage by large Australian firms”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 26 No. 10, pp. 36‐45. Deng, H., Yeh, C. and Willis, R.J. (2000), “Inter‐company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights”, Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 27, pp. 963‐73. Dickson, G.W. (1966), “An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions”, Journal of Purchasing, Vol. 2, pp. 5‐17. Ellram, L.M. (1990), “The supplier selection decision in strategic partnership”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 8‐15. Frazier, G.L., Spekman, R.E. and O'Neal, C.R. (1988), “Just‐in‐time exchange relationships in industrial markets”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 52‐67. Harrington, L. (1994), “Van Lines change their stripes”, Transportation and Distribution, December, p. 29. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981), Multi Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer‐Verlag, New York, NY. Jee, D. and Kang, K. (2000), “A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory”, Materials and Design, Vol. 21, pp. 199‐206. Lieb, R.C. (1992), “The use of third party logistics services by large American manufacturers”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 29‐42. Maltz, A.B. (1995), “Why you outsource dictates how”, Transportation & Distribution, March, pp. 73‐80. Masella, C. and Rangone, A. (2000), “A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection systems for different types of co‐operative customer/supplier relationships”, International Journal of Operation & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 70‐84. Mason‐Jones, R. and Towill, D.R. (1998), “Time compression in the supply chain: information management is the vital ingredient”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 93‐104. Menon, M., McGinnis, M. and Ackermann, K. (1998), “Selection criteria for providers of third‐party logistics services: an exploratory study”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 121‐37. Muller, E.J. (1993a), “The top guns of third‐party logistics”, Distribution, March, pp. 30‐8. Muller, E.J. (1993b), “More top guns of third‐party logistics”, Distribution, May, pp. 44‐5. Nydick, R.L. and Hill, R.P. (1992), “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to structure the supplier selection procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 28, pp. 31‐6. Parkan, C. and Wu, M. (1999), “Decision‐making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 36, pp. 503‐23. Petroni, A. and Braglia, M. (2000), “A quality‐assurance oriented methodology for handling trade‐offs in supplier selection”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 96‐111. Pollit, D. (1998), “Logistics management at the threshold of the new millennium”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 167‐226. Sink, H. and Langley, J. (1997), “A managerial framework for the acquisition of third party logistics service”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 163‐89. Sink, H., Langley, J. and Gibson, B. (1996), “Buyer observations in the US third‐party logistics market”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 38‐46. Spencer, M.S., Rogers, D.S. and Daugherty, P.J. (1994), “JIT systems and external logistics suppliers”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 60‐74. Stalk, G. and Hout, T. (1990), Competing against Time, Free Press, New York, NY. Tate, K. (1996), “The elements of a successful logistic partnership”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 7‐13. Towill, D.R. (1996), “Time compression and supply chain management – a guided tour”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 15‐27. Triantaphyllou, E. and Lin, C.T. (1996), “Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision making methods”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 14, pp. 281‐310. Tsaur, S.H., Chang, T.Y. and Chang‐Hua Yen, C. (2002), “The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM”, Tourism Management, Vol. 23, pp. 107‐15. Van Hoek, R.I. (2001), “The contribution of performance measurement to the expansion of third party logistics alliances in the supply chain”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 Nos 1‐2, pp. 15‐29. Van Laarhoven, P., Berglund, M. and Peters, M. (2000), “Third‐party logistics in Europe – five years later”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 425‐42. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Benton, W.C. (1991), “Vendor selection criteria and methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 50, pp. 2‐18. Zadeh, L.A. (1965), “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 338‐53. Zanakis, S.H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N. and Dublish, S. (1998), “Multi‐attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 107, pp. 507‐29. Zenz, G. (1981), Purchasing and the Management of Materials, Wiley, New York, NY. Zimmermann, H.J. (1991), Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, 2nd ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 11 Số 4

294-308

Thông tin tác giả