Self-Concept: Its Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure

Alwin, D. F. &Jackson, D. J. (1981). Applications of simultaneous factor analysis to issues of factorial invariance. In D. D. Jackson & E. F. Borgotta (Eds.), Facto~ analysis and measurement in sociological research: A multidimensional perspectiue (pp. 249-280). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Bentler, P. M. (1972a). A review of the Piers-Harris Children's Self Concept Scale. In 0. K. Buros (Ed.), 7th mental measurement yearbook (pp. 124-125). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

Bentler, P. M. (1972b). A review of the Tennessee Self Concept Scale. In 0. K. Buros (Ed.), 7th mental measurement yearbook (pp. 151-152). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588

Boersma, F. J. & Chapman, J. W. (1979). Student's Percep tion of Ability Scale Manual. University of Alberta. Edmonton, Canada.

Brookover, W. B., Erickson, E. L. &Joiner, L. M. (1967). Self-concept of ability and school achievement, 111 (United States Office of Education Cooperative Research Report, Project No. 2831). East Lansing: Michigan State University.

Byrne, B. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review ofEducationa 1 Research, 54, 427-456.

Coopersmith, S. A. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.

Dusek, J. B. & Flaherty, J. F. (1981). The development of self-concept during the adolescent years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Dewelopment, 46 (4, Serial No. 191).

Dyer C. D., 1964, Dissertation Abstracts, 25, 8154

Fernandes M. W., 1978, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 537, 10.1177/001316447803800243

Fitts, W. H. (1965). A manual for the Tennessee Self Concept Scale, Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests.

10.1037//0022-3514.46.2.404

10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.921

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory ofmultiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Hansford B. C., 1982, Reuiew of Educational Research, 52, 123

Harter S., 1982, The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Child Deuelopment, 53, 87

Harter, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives o n the selfsystem. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, (Vol. 4, 4th ed., pp. 275-385). New York: Wiley.

James, W. (1963). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston. (Originally published 1890)

Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1978). LlSREL IV: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: International Education Services.

Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: International Education Services.

Kokenes B. M., 1974, Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 4877A

Marsh, H. W., Barnes, J., Cairns, L. &Tidman, M. (1984). The Self Description Questionnaire (SDR): Age effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolesce+t children. lournal of Educational Psychology, 75,940-956.

Marsh, H. V$. & O'Niell, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnair 111 (SDQ 111): The construct validity of multidimensi nal self-concept ratings by late-adolescents. lournal o 4 Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.

Marsh, H. y., Relich, J. D. & Smith, I. D. (1983). Selfconcept: T h e construct validity of interpretations based upon thd SDQ. lournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173-187.

Marsh, H. W. & Smith, I. D. (1982). Multitrait-multimethod nalyses of two self:concept instruments. Journal of Ed cationd Psychology, 74,430140.

Marsh H., 1983, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 405

Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G. Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Piers R. V., 1964, Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 91, 10.1037/h0044453

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent child. Princeton: Princeton University I'ress.

Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New Kork: Basic.

Sears, P. S. (1963). The effect of cl:as.i.room conditions on the strength of achievement motive and work output on elementary school children (United States Office of Education Cooperative Research Project, ]Project No. OE-873). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Shavelson, R. J. &Bolus, R. (198'2). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methodls. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 3-17.

Shavelson R. J., 1976, Review of Educational Research, 46, 407, 10.3102/00346543046003407

Shepard L. A., 1979, American Educational Research Journal, 16, 139, 10.3102/00028312016002139

10.1037//0033-2909.86.3.549

Soares, L. M. & Soares, A. T. (1977, April). The selfconcept: Mini, mmi, or multi? Paper presented at tlhe 1977 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Kork.

Soares, L. M. & Soares, A. T. (1982, July). Convergence and discrimination in academic self-concepts. Paper presented at the 20th Congress of the International Association of Applied Psychology, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.

Winne, P. H. & Marx, R. W. (1981, April). Convevgent and discriminant validity in self-concept measurement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, L~os Angeles.

Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self-concqbt (rev. ed., Vol. 1). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.