Effect of personalization of instructional context on the achievement and attitudes of hispanic students

Anand, P. G., & Ross, S. M. (1987). Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elementary school children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 72–78.

Ballew, H., & Cunningham, J. W. (1982). Diagnosing strengths and weaknesses of sixth-grade students in solving word problems.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 202–210.

Bracken, B. A. (1982). Effect of personalized basal stories on the reading comprehension of fourth-grade poor and average readers.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 320–324.

Caldwell, J. H., & Goldin, G. A. (1987). Variables affecting word problem difficulty in secondary school mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 187–196.

Cheek, H. N., & Castle, K. (1981). The effects of back-to-basics on mathematics education.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 263–277.

De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & De Win, L. (1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children's problem representations and solutions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 460–470.

Friedman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks.Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 185–213.

Herndon, J. N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 11–14.

Hilton, T. L., & Berglund, G. W. (1974). Sex differences in mathematics achievement: A longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Research, 67(5), 231–237.

Hudson, T. (1983). Correspondences and numerical differences between disjoint sets.Child Development, 54(1), 84–90.

Jones, B. F., & Friedman, L. F. (1988). Active instruction for students at risk: Remarks on merging process-outcome and cognitive perspectives.Educational Psychologist, 23(3), 299–308.

Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text.Cognition and Instruction, 3(2), 87–108.

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.),The psychology of gender (pp. 67–101). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

López, C. L., & Sullivan, H. J. (1991). Effects of personalized math instruction for Hispanic students.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16(1), 95–100.

Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Marshall, S. P. (1984). Sex differences in children's mathematics achievement: Solving computations and story problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 194–204.

Marshall, S. P., & Smith, J. D. (1987). Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 372–383.

Miller, D. C., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1991). Personalizing sentences and text.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 287–292.

Muth, K. D. (1984). Solving arithmetic word problems: Role of reading and computational skills.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 205–210.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1977).Mathematics technical report: Exercise volume. (Report No. 04-MA-20). Denver: Educational Commission of the States.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1979).Changes in mathematical achievement, 1973–78. (Report No. 09-MA-03). Denver: Educational Commission of the States.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1983).The third national mathematics assessment: Results, trends and issues. (Report No. 13-MA-01). Denver: Education Commission of the States.

Quintero, A. H. (1983). Conceptual understanding in solving two-step word problems with a ratio.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 102–113.

Ross, S. M., & Anand, P. G. (1987). A computer-based strategy for personalizing verbal problems in teaching mathematics.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 35(3), 151–162.

Ross, S. M., McCormick, D., & Krisak, N. (1986). Adapting the thematic context of mathematical problems to student interests: Individualized versus group-based strategies.Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), 245–252.

Ross, S. M., Rakow, E. A., & Bush, A. J. (1980). Instructional adaptation for self-managed learning systems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 312–320.

Silver, E. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem-solving. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.),Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 33–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Valverde, L. A. (1984). Underachievement and underrepresentation of Hispanics in mathematics and mathematics-related careers.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(2), 123–133.

Wang, M. C., & Lindvall, C. M. (1984). Individual differences and school learning environments. In E. W. Gordon (Ed.),Review of research in education (Vol. XI, pp. 162–225). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Wright, J. P., & Wright, C. D. (1986). Personalized verbal problems: An application of the language experience approach.Journal of Educational Research, 79(6), 358–362.