Predicting Student Well-Being: Network Analysis Based on PISA 2018

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health - Tập 17 Số 11 - Trang 4014
Elena Govorova1, Isabel Benítez2, José Muñiz1
1Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain
2Department of Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain

Tóm tắt

The latest trends in research extend the focus of school effectiveness beyond students’ acquisition of knowledge and skills, looking at aspects such as well-being in the academic context. Although the concept of well-being itself has been defined and measured in various ways, neither its dimensions nor the relationships between the components have been clearly described. The aim of the present study was to analyse how the elements of well-being interact and determine how they are influenced by school factors. To do that, we conducted a network analysis based on data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 international assessment. Our results demonstrated that cognitive, psychological, and social well-being variables form a solid welfare construct in the educational context, where students’ resilience and fear of failure, along with their sense of belonging, play central roles. Although the influence of school factors on student well-being is generally low, teaching enthusiasm and support promote positive school climates which are, in turn, crucial in reducing bullying.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

UNESCO (2020, May 29). UNESCO Strategy on Education for Health and Well-Being: Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246453.

UN General Assembly (2020, May 29). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations, Treaty Series, Volume 1577, p. 3. Available online: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html:1989.

Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., and Hooper, M. (2020, May 29). PIRLS 2016 International Results in Reading. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Website. Available online: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/international-results/.

OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III), OECD.

Anderson, 2016, Improving student wellbeing: Having a say at school, Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., 27, 348, 10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336

Borgonovi, F., and Pál, J. (2016). A Framework for the Analysis of Student Well-Being in the PISA 2015 Study: Being 15 in 2015. OECD Education Working Papers, OECD Publishing.

Chapman, A. (2015). Wellbeing and Schools: Exploring the Normative Dimensions. Rethinking Youth Wellbeing, Springer.

Bradshaw, 2007, An index of child well-being in the European Union, Soc. Indic. Res., 80, 133, 10.1007/s11205-006-9024-z

Currie, 2009, Social determinants of health and well-being among young people, Health Behav. Sch.-Aaged Child. (HBSC) Stud. Int. Rep., 2010, 271

Rees, G., and Main, G. (2015). Children’s Views on their Lives and Well-Being In 15 Countries: An Initial Report on the Children’s Worlds Survey, 2013–2014, Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB).

Huebner, 2004, Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologists, Psychol. Sch., 41, 81, 10.1002/pits.10140

Torsheim, 2001, Sense of coherence and school-related stress as predictors of subjective health complaints in early adolescence: Interactive, indirect or direct relationships?, Soc. Sci. Med., 53, 603, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00370-1

Slee, P.T., and Skrzypiec, G. (2016). Well-being, Positive Peer Relations and Bullying in School Settings, Springer.

McLellan, 2015, Measuring children and young people’s wellbeing in the school context, Camb. J. Educ., 45, 307, 10.1080/0305764X.2014.889659

Fattore, 2007, Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being, Soc. Indic. Res., 80, 5, 10.1007/s11205-006-9019-9

OECD (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume III), OECD.

Govorova, 2020, How Schools Affect Student Well-Being: A Cross-Cultural Approach in 35 OECD Countries, Front. Psychol., 11, 431, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00431

Damon, 2004, What is Positive Youth Development?, ANNALS Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci., 591, 13, 10.1177/0002716203260092

Bandura, 1977, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychol. Rev., 84, 191, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Conroy, 2002, Multidimensional fear of failure measurement: The performance failure appraisal inventory, J. Appl. Sp. Psychol., 14, 76, 10.1080/10413200252907752

Dweck, 2019, Mindsets: A view from two eras, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 14, 481, 10.1177/1745691618804166

Nelson, 2017, Moving from static to dynamic models of the onset of mental disorder: A review, JAMA Psychiatry, 74, 528, 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0001

Borsboom, 2017, A network theory of mental disorders, World Psychiatry, 16, 5, 10.1002/wps.20375

Borsboom, 2013, Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology, Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., 9, 91, 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608

Cramer, 2010, Comorbidity: A network perspective, Behav. Brain Sci., 33, 137, 10.1017/S0140525X09991567

Costantini, 2016, The network of conscientiousness, J. Res. Pers., 65, 68, 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.003

Costantini, 2015, State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R, J. Res. Pers., 54, 13, 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003

Abacioglu, 2019, Exploring multicultural classroom dynamics: A network analysis, J. Sch. Psychol., 74, 90, 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.02.003

Sachisthal, 2019, Introducing a Science Interest Network Model to Reveal Country Differences, J. Educ. Psychol., 111, 1063, 10.1037/edu0000327

OECD (2017). How Your School Compares Internationally: OECD Test for Schools (Based on PISA), OECD.

OECD (2017). PISA 2015 Technical Report, OECD.

Van de Vijver, F.J.R., Avvisati, F., and Davidov, E. (2019). Invariance analyses in large-scale studies. OECD Education Working Papers, OECD Publishing.

Muraki, 1992, A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an Em Algorithm, ETS Res. Rep. Ser., 1992, i-30

OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, OECD.

Schmittmann, 2013, Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena, New Ideas Psychol., 31, 43, 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.007

Grunspan, 2014, Understanding classrooms through social network analysis: A primer for social network analysis in education research, CBE—Life Sci. Educ., 13, 167, 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0162

Borgatti, 2009, Network analysis in the social sciences, Science, 323, 892, 10.1126/science.1165821

2018, Network analysis in psychology, Papeles del Psicólogo, 39, 1

Barrat, 2004, The architecture of complex weighted networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 3747, 10.1073/pnas.0400087101

Epskamp, 2012, qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data, J. Stat. Softw., 48, 1, 10.18637/jss.v048.i04

Van Borkulo, C.D., Epskamp, S., and Milner, A. (2020, May 29). NetworkComparisonTest. Available online: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/NetworkComparisonTest/NetworkComparisonTest.pdf.

Epskamp, 2018, Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper, Behav. Res. Methods, 50, 195, 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1

Christensen, 2018, Network structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales–Short Forms: Examining psychometric network filtering approaches, Behav. Res. Methods, 50, 2531, 10.3758/s13428-018-1032-9

Cramer, 2012, Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can’t Like Parties if You Don’t Like People, Eur. J. Personal., 26, 414, 10.1002/per.1866

Carle, 2004, Resilience in a community sample of children of alcoholics: Its prevalence and relation to internalizing symptomatology and positive affect, J. Appl. Dev. Psychol., 25, 577, 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.08.005

2009, Resiliencia y salud en niños y adolescentes, Ciencia Ergo Sum, 16, 247

Waxman, 1997, Motivation and learning environment differences between resilient and nonresilient Latino middle school students, Hisp. J. Behav. Sci., 19, 137, 10.1177/07399863970192003

Erberber, E., Stephens, M., Mamedova, S., Ferguson, S., and Kroeger, T. (2020, May 29). Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students Who Are Academically Successful: Examining Academic Resilience Crossnationally. IEA’s Policy Brief Series, 5. Available online: http://www.iea.nl/policy_briefs.html.

2019, Resilient and low performer students: Personal and family determinants in european countries= Estudiantes resilientes y de bajo rendimiento: Determinantes personales y familiares en países europeos. Antecedentes, Psicothema, 31, 363

Yeager, 2012, Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed, Educ. Psychol., 47, 302, 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

OECD (2011). Against the Odds, OECD.

Pitzer, 2017, Predictors of changes in students’ motivational resilience over the school year: The roles of teacher support, self-appraisals, and emotional reactivity, Int. J. Behav. Dev., 41, 15, 10.1177/0165025416642051

Wang, 2010, Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school, Am. Educ. Res. J., 47, 633, 10.3102/0002831209361209

Lee, 2012, The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance, Int. J. Educ. Res., 53, 330, 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.006

Murillo, 2011, Factores escolares asociados al desarrollo socio-afectivo en Iberoamérica, Relieve, 17, 1

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Tập 17 Số 11

4014

Thông tin tác giả