Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects

Journal of Physiology - Tập 591 Số 10 - Trang 2563-2578 - 2013
Asif Rahman1, Davide Reato1, Mattia Arlotti2, Fernando Gasca3, Abhishek Datta4, Lucas C. Parra1, Marom Bikson1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York (CCNY), The City University of New York (CUNY), USA
2Department of Electronics, Computer Science, and Systems, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy
3Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems and the Graduate School for Computing in Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Lübeck, Germany
4Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Tóm tắt

Key points The diversity of cellular targets of direct current stimulation (DCS), including somas, dendrites and axon terminals, determine the modulation of synaptic efficacy. Axon terminals of cortical pyramidal neurons are two–three times more susceptible to polarization than somas. DCS in humans results in current flow dominantly parallel to the cortical surface, which in animal models of cortical stimulation results in synaptic pathway‐specific modulation of neuronal excitability. These results suggest that somatic polarization together with axon terminal polarization may be important for synaptic pathway‐specific modulation of DCS, which underlies modulation of neuronal excitability during transcranial DCS. Abstract  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non‐invasive brain stimulation technique to modulate cortical excitability. Although increased/decreased excitability under the anode/cathode electrode is nominally associated with membrane depolarization/hyperpolarization, which cellular compartments (somas, dendrites, axons and their terminals) mediate changes in cortical excitability remains unaddressed. Here we consider the acute effects of DCS on excitatory synaptic efficacy. Using multi‐scale computational models and rat cortical brain slices, we show the following. (1) Typical tDCS montages produce predominantly tangential (relative to the cortical surface) direction currents (4–12 times radial direction currents), even directly under electrodes. (2) Radial current flow (parallel to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy consistent with somatic polarization, with depolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (3) Tangential current flow (perpendicular to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy acutely (during stimulation) in an afferent pathway‐specific manner that is consistent with terminal polarization, with hyperpolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (4) Maximal polarization during uniform DCS is expected at distal (the branch length is more than three times the membrane length constant) synaptic terminals, independent of and two–three times more susceptible than pyramidal neuron somas. We conclude that during acute DCS the cellular targets responsible for modulation of synaptic efficacy are concurrently somata and axon terminals, with the direction of cortical current flow determining the relative influence.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3635-09.2010

10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1996)6:1<79::AID-HIPO13>3.0.CO;2-H

10.1097/01.wnr.0000127460.08361.84

Arlotti M, 2012, Axon terminal polarization induced by weak uniform DC electric fields: a modeling study, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2012, 4575

Aroniadou VA, 1993, The patterns and synaptic properties of horizontal intracortical connections in the rat motor cortex, J Neurophysiol, 70, 1553, 10.1152/jn.1993.70.4.1553

10.1093/cercor/5.4.353

10.1038/nrn1885

10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.377

Bikson M, 2012, The “quasi‐uniform” assumption in animal and computational models of non‐invasive electrical stimulation, Brain Stimul

10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055772

10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259548

Bikson M, 2012, Transcranial Brain Stimulation, 456

10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007425

10.1085/jgp.40.4.565

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-07-05324.1995

10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017232

10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015963

10.1016/0014-4886(62)90056-0

10.1016/j.brs.2010.11.001

10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005

10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00091

10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137711

10.1007/BF00586421

10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035

10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.005

10.1038/220382a0

10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.4202

Hause L, 1975, A Mathematical Model for Transmembrane Potentials Secondary to Extracellular Fields in Electroanaesthesia: Biomedical and Biophysical Studies

Hess G, 1996, Conditions for the induction of long‐term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex, J Neurophysiol, 75, 1765, 10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.1765

Hess G, 1994, Long‐term potentiation of horizontal connections provides a mechanism to reorganize cortical motor maps, J Neurophysiol, 71, 2543, 10.1152/jn.1994.71.6.2543

10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006961

10.1038/193174a0

10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008414

10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013897

10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3961

10.1152/jn.00715.2011

10.1093/cercor/3.5.430

10.1126/science.285.5435.1870

10.1073/pnas.95.9.5323

10.1073/pnas.1121147109

10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007927

Miranda PC, 2007, The role of tissue heterogeneity in neural stimulation by applied electric fields, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2007, 1715

10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.009

10.1109/10.245636

10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x

10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899

10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429

10.1152/jn.1965.28.1.166

10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.007

10.1016/0006-8993(75)90364-9

10.1152/jn.00319.2011

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2059-10.2010

10.1038/678

Salvador R, 2010, Modeling the electric field induced in a high resolution realistic head model during transcranial current stimulation, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010, 2073

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5365-11.2012

10.1085/jgp.45.6.1181

10.1073/pnas.42.9.687

10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83558-5

10.1093/cercor/12.4.395

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Physiology

Tập 591 Số 10

2563-2578

Thông tin tác giả