Drivers of Users’ Embracement of 3D Digital Educational Spaces in Higher Education: A Qualitative Approach

Technology, Knowledge and Learning - Tập 28 - Trang 1707-1744 - 2022
Reza Ghanbarzadeh1,2, Amir Hossein Ghapanchi2,3
1Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Australia
2Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
3College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

Tóm tắt

Three-Dimensional Virtual Worlds (3DVW) have significant promise for the development of teaching and learning environments. Educational communities have become interested in such virtual platforms, and this technology has widely benefited educational settings. This study aims to identify the factors that drive the acceptance of 3DVWs as means for distance learning by higher education students, and provides a taxonomy of such drivers. A qualitative approach was employed for data collection to enable a detailed exploration. Two data collection instruments were used in the experiment: a virtual synchronous focus group and an open-ended question. One hundred twenty-one students participated in 13 virtual focus groups, and 124 students responded to the open-ended questions. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data, and as a result, 26 factors were identified as antecedents to the acceptance of 3DVW in higher education. Those factors are then classified into 12 categories based on their definition and similarities. Twenty-one out of the 26 factors impact the user acceptance of 3DVW positively, and five factors impact it negatively. The findings of this study indicate advances in theory, methodology, and pedagogical practice.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, C. L., & Zarchin, Y. R. (2002). The “virtual focus group”: Using the Internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 31(4), 418–427. Athanassopoulos, A., et al. (1999). A descriptive assessment of the production and cost efficiency of general hospitals in Greece. Health Care Management Science, 2(2), 97–106. Banff, A., Julien, M., Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (2006). "beyond alternative work arrangements: perceived schedule flexibility as a moderator of work-life conflict." Barfield, W., & Hendrix, C. (1995). The effect of update rate on the sense of presence within virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 1(1), 3–15. Bell, M. (2008). "Toward a Definition of 'Virtual Worlds,'." Virtual Worlds Research: Past, Present and. Bloom, M. and D. Hanych (2002). "Skeptics and true believers hash it out." Community College Week 4(14). Boulos, M. N. K., et al. (2007). Second Life: An overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 24(4), 233–245. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Brown, A., Hodge, E., Kisling, E., & Collins, S. (2009). The Virtual Worlds in Education Conference: Lessons Learned from Conducting an International, Peer-Reviewed Conference within Second Life. Educational Technology, 49(3), 33–36. Bystrom, K.-E., Barfield, W., & Hendrix, C. (1999). "A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environments." Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8(2): 241–244. Chang Lee, K., Shen, X.-L., Wang, N., Sun, Y., & Xiang, L. (2013). Unleash the power of mobile word-of-mouth: An empirical study of system and information characteristics in ubiquitous decision making. Online Information Review, 37(1), 42–60. Chen, X., et al. (2009). "3-D virtual worlds: Education and learning." SIGHCI 2009 Proceedings: 13. Chen, X. F., Slau, K., & Nah, F. F.-H. (2008). "Adoption of 3-D virtual worlds for education." Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T.-M., & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1136–1144. Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.. Newjersey: Pearson Ed, Inc. Dale, C., & A. M. Lane. (2007). A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? An analysis of student engagement with virtual learning environments. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education. Davis, F. D. (1989). "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology." MIS quarterly: 319–340. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220–233. Dean, D. G. (1960). "Alienation and political apathy." Social Forces: 185–189. Dean, D. G. (1961). "Alienation: Its meaning and measurement." American sociological review: 753–758. Second Life Education. (2011). The Virtual Learning Advantage. Retrieved on March 23, 2022, from http://lecs-static-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/work/SL-Edu-Brochure-010411.pdf Fang, X., Chan, S., Brzezinski, J., & Xu, S. (2005). Moderating effects of task type on wireless technology acceptance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 123–157. Fırat, M. (2010). Learning in 3D virtual worlds and current situation in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 249–254. Ghanbarzadeh, R., & Ghapanchi, A. H. (2020). Antecedents and Consequences of User Acceptance of Three-Dimensional Virtual Worlds in Higher Education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 855–889. Han, B., & Windsor, J. (2013). An investigation of the smartphone user’s in–game purchase intention. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 11(6), 617–635. Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996). Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 5(3), 274–289. Hoehle, H. and E. Scornavacca (2008). Unveiling experts perceptions towards the characteristics and value propositions of mobile information systems. 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business, IEEE. Hsu, L. (2011). "The perceptual learning styles of hospitality students in a virtual learning environment: The case of Taiwan." Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education (Pre-2012) 10(1): 114. Hsu, L. (2012). Web 3D simulation-based application in tourism education: A case study with Second Life. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 11(2), 113–124. Huang, S. T., KamelBoulos, M. N., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2008). Scientific discourse 2.0. EMBO reports, 9(6), 496–499. Jestice, R. and S. S. Kahai (2010). The Effectiveness of Virtual Worlds for Education: An Empirical Study. AMCIS. Jing, C., et al. (2007). Application of real-time cooperative editing in urban planning management system. Geoinformatics 2007, International Society for Optics and Photonics. Kim, G. J. (2005). Designing virtual reality systems. Springer. Koles, B., & Nagy, P. (2012). Virtual customers behind avatars: The relationship between virtual identity and virtual consumption in second life. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 87–105. Lewis, E. (2008). Secondary English teachers' perspectives on the incorporation of new literacies in their pedagogy, ProQuest. Lyu, M. R. (1996). Handbook of software reliability engineering, IEEE computer society press CA. Mantovani, F. and G. Castelnuovo (2003). "The sense of presence in virtual training: enhancing skills acquisition and transfer of knowledge through learning experience in virtual environments." Miller, J. and O. Khera (2010). "Digital library adoption and the technology acceptance model: A cross-country analysis." The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 40. Okan, Z. (2003). Edutainment: Is learning at risk? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 255–264. Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1666538. Riley, S. K. L. (2008). Teaching in virtual worlds: Opportunities and challenges. Setting Knowledge Free: The Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 5(5), 127. Robinson, J. (2011). "Assessing the value of using an online discussion board for engaging students." Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education (Pre-2012) 10(1): 13. Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2006). Understanding Academic Confidence. Psychology Teaching Review, 12(1), 29–42. Sharma, A., Grover, P., & Kumar, R. (2009). Reusability assessment for software components. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 34(2), 1–6. Shatz, S. M., et al. (1992). Task allocation for maximising reliability of distributed computer systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 41(9), 1156–1168. Singh, N., & Lee, M. J. (2009). Exploring perceptions toward education in 3-D virtual environments: An introduction to “second life.” Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 8(4), 315–327. Stone, S. J. (2009). "Instructors' Perceptions of Three-Dimensional (3D) Virtual Worlds: Instructional Use, Implementation, and Benefits for Adult Learners." Technology, A. A. o. U. W. E. F. C. o., et al. (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age, American Association of University Women. Tomeh, A. K. and M. Petrasek (1978). "Formal Group Membership A Study of Structural and Attitudinal Variables." Social Science: 8–23. Turney, L., & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), 32–43. Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541–549. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Venkatesh, V. and S. A. Brown (2001). "A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges." MIS Quarterly: 71–102. Wyse, S. E. (2011). "What is the difference between qualitative research and quantitative research." Message posted to http://www.snapsurveys.com/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-qualitativeresearch-and-quantitative-research.