Truth and paradox

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 11 - Trang 1-60 - 1982
Anil Gupta1
1McGill University Montreal, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Burge, Tyler: 1979, ‘Semantical paradox’, Journal of Philosophy 76, 169–98. Chihara, Charles: 1979, ‘The semantic paradoxes: a diagnostic investigation’, Philosophical Review 88, 590–618. Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert (eds.): 1972, Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston. Grover, Dorothy L.: 1977, ‘Inheritors and paradox,’ Journal of Philosophy 74, 590–604. Grover, Dorothy L., Camp, Joseph L., and Belnap, Nuel D.: 1975, ‘A prosentential theory of truth,’ Philosophical Studies 27, 73–125. Hawthorn, John: 1982, ‘The liar and theories of truth’, forthcoming doctoral dissertation, McGill University. Herzberger, Hans G.: 1967, ‘The truth-conditional consistency of natural languages,’ Journal of Philosophy 64, 29–35. Herzberger, Hans G.: 1970a, ‘Paradoxes of grounding in semantics,’ Journal of Philosophy 67, 145–67. Herzberger, Hans G.: 1970b, ‘Truth and modality in semantially closed languages’, in Martin (1970), pp. 25–46. Kasher, Asa (ed.): 1976, Language in Focus, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston. Kripke, Saul A.: 1975, ‘Outline of a theory of truth,’ Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716. Linsky, Leonard: 1952, Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, University of Illinois Press. Urbana, Chicago and London. Mackie, John L.: 1973, Truth, Probability and Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Martin, Robert L.: 1967, ‘Toward a solution to the liar paradox,’ Philosophical Review 76, 279–311. Martin, Robert L.: 1968, ‘On Grelling's paradox’, Philosophical Review 77, 321–31. Martin, Robert L. (ed.): 1970, The Paradox of the Liar, Yale University Press, New Haven and London. Martin, Robert L.: 1970a, ‘A category solution to the liar’, in Martin (1970), pp. 91–112. Martin, Robert L. and Woodruff, Peter W.: 1975, ‘On representing ‘true-in-L’ in L.’ Philosophia 5, 217–21. Also reprinted in Kasher (1976), pp. 113–17. Parsons, Charles: 1974, ‘The liar paradox,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 381–412. Popper, Karl R.: 1965, Conjectures and Refutations, Harper Torchbooks, New York. Prior, Arthur N.: 1961, ‘On a family of paradoxes,’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 2, 16–32. Prior, Arthur N.: 1967, ‘Correspondence theory of truth’, in Paul Edwards, (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 2, pp. 223–32. Putman, Hilary: 1978, Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Henley and Boston. Russell, Bertrand: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George Allen & Unwin, London (Pelican edition, 1962). Skyrms, Brian: 1970a, ‘Return of the liar: three-valued logic and the concept of truth,’ American Philosophical Quarterley 7, 153–61. Skyrms, Brian: 1970b, ‘Notes on quantification and self-reference’, in Martin (1970), pp. 67–74. Tarski, Alfred: 1944, ‘The semantic conception of truth,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–76. Reprinted in Linsky (1952), pp. 13–47. Tarski, Alfred: 1956, ‘The concept of truth in formalized language,’ in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, pp. 152–278. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Tarski, Alfred: 1969, ‘Truth and proof,’ Scientific American 220, 63–77. van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1968 ‘Presupposition, imptlication, and self-reference,’ Journal of Philosophy 65, 136–52. van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1970a, ‘Truth and paradoxical consequences’, in Martin (1970), pp. 13–23. van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1970b, ‘Rejoinder: On a Kantian conception of language’, in Martin (1970), pp. 59–66. Wallace, John: 1972, ‘On the frame of reference’, in Davidson and Harman (1972), pp. 219–52.