The Foot-in-the-Door Compliance Procedure: A Multiple-Process Analysis and Review

Personality and Social Psychology Review - Tập 3 Số 4 - Trang 303-325 - 1999
Jerry M. Burger1
1Department of Psychology, Santa Clara University

Tóm tắt

Research on the social compliance procedure known as the footin-the-door (FITD) technique is reviewed. Several psychological processes that may be set in motion with a FITD manipulation are identified: self-perception, psychological reactance, conformity, consistency, attributions, and commitment. A review of relevant investigations and several meta-analyses support the notion that each of these processes can influence compliance behavior in the FITD situation. I argue that the combined effects of these processes can account for successful FITD demonstrations as well as studies in which the technique was ineffective or led to a decrease in compliance. The experimental conditions most likely to produce an FITD effect are identified.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/3150502

American Psychological Association, 1974, PsycLIT

Asch, S. E., 1951, Groups, leadership, and men, 177

10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3.887

10.2307/3033811

10.1177/0146167283092002

10.1080/00224545.1988.9711367

10.1080/10570319409374490

Bem, D. J., 1972, Advances in experimental social psychology, 1

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60025-8

10.1177/0146167289154002

Brehm, J. W., 1966, A theory of psychological reactance

10.1037/h0023034

Brehm, S. S., 1981, Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00920.x

Burger, J. M., 1997, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 91

10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.492

10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.774

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01382.x

Cialdini, R. B., 1993, Influence: Science and practice, 3

10.1037/0021-9010.61.3.295

10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.463

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5

10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.318

10.1037/h0076284

10.1521/soco.1982.1.2.110

10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2221

10.1177/014616728173010

10.1177/014616727700300421

10.1177/0146167282083020

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00218.x

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00028.x

10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153

10.2307/3151661

Festinger, L., 1957, A theory of cognitive dissonance, 10.1515/9781503620766

10.2466/pr0.1974.34.1.35

10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.580

10.1037/h0023552

10.2307/3151342

10.1037/h0076482

10.1080/00224545.1986.9713577

10.1080/00224545.1981.9922755

10.1080/00224545.1981.9922728

10.1080/00224545.1982.9713402

10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.91

10.2307/2092623

10.1086/268669

10.2307/3150534

10.1177/014616728063006

10.1080/00224545.1972.9922544

10.1080/00224545.1973.9922566

10.1080/00224545.1976.9924772

10.1037/10628-000

10.1016/0167-4870(88)90032-3

Hornik, J., 1991, Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 49

Kamins, M. A., 1989, Journal of the Market Research Societ, 31, 273

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02217.x

Kiesler, C. A., 1971, The psychology of commitment

10.1177/0022022189201001

10.1080/00224545.1984.9924508

10.1016/0022-1031(73)90037-1

10.1207/s1532768xjepc0703_2

10.1037/h0063098

10.1177/0146167286122006

10.1080/00224545.1988.9924559

10.1016/0022-1031(74)90053-5

10.1016/0022-1031(71)90025-4

10.1086/208720

10.2307/3150775

10.2307/3150835

10.1080/00224545.1994.9710878

10.1177/014616728173011

10.4135/9781412984997

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

10.1177/0146167283093015

10.2307/3150736

10.1086/208691

10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.517

10.2224/sbp.1976.4.2.267

10.3758/BF03334809

10.3758/BF03330257

Sherif, M., 1936, The psychology of social norms

10.1037/h0076245

10.1080/00223980.1987.9915505

10.2307/3033711

10.1080/00224545.1982.9922806

10.2307/3033708

10.2307/3151253

10.1037/h0076690

10.3758/BF03204813

10.1177/014616728063018

10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01207.x

10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.74

10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199602)13:2<157::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-E

10.1207/s15324834basp1002_5

Wynn, G. W., 1985, Journal of the Market Research Society, 27, 15

10.2307/3151410

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb02712.x