Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization

Organization Science - Tập 16 Số 5 - Trang 491-508 - 2005
Filipe Santos1, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt2
1Entrepreneurship and Family Enterprise Area, INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France#TAB#
2Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Terman Building, Room 415, Stanford, California 94305

Tóm tắt

Organizational boundaries are a central phenomenon, yet despite their significance, research is dominated by transaction cost economics and related exchange-efficiency perspectives. While useful, it is time to engage in a broader view. Our purpose is to provide a deeper understanding of organizational boundaries. First, we develop four boundary conceptions (efficiency, power, competence, and identity) and their distinctive features including organizational and environmental assumptions, unique conception of boundaries, theoretical arguments, empirical validity, contributions, and limitations. Efficiency takes a legal-ownership view of atomistic boundary decisions. In contrast, the power conception emphasizes the sphere of influence of the organization, while competence focuses on the resource portfolio and its related configuration, and identity centers on the often unconscious mind-set by which organizational members understand “who we are.” We also indicate relationships, both coevolutionary and synergistic, among the conceptions. Second, we juxtapose these conceptions with the current literature to create a springboard for a renewed research agenda. This agenda includes greater focus on nonefficiency perspectives, relationships (not competition) among boundary conceptions, studies that take the normative implication of theories more seriously, and problem-driven research on contemporary boundary issues such as contract employment and business ecosystems.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/smj.176

Albert S., 1985, Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263

Alchian A., 1972, Amer. Econom. Rev., 62, 777

10.2307/258740

10.1002/smj.4250140105

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2<129::AID-SMJ798>3.0.CO;2-H

Arthur W. B., 1996, Harvard Bus. Rev., 74, 100

10.1002/smj.4250070405

10.1177/014920639101700107

10.1093/jleo/15.1.1

10.1002/smj.4250160104

10.1287/orsc.11.2.212.12511

10.5465/amr.2000.2791605

Brown S. L., 1998, Competing on the Edge—Strategy as Structured Chaos

10.2307/3094825

10.2307/2393493

10.2307/3094808

10.2307/2393923

Caves R., 1970, Industrial Organization and Economic Development, 283

Chandler A. D., 1962, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise

Chandler A. D., 1977, The Visible Hand : The Managerial Revolution in American Business

10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

Coase R. H., 1993, The Nature of the Firm, 61

10.1287/orsc.7.5.477

10.5465/amr.1984.4277657

D’Aveni R., 2001, Strategic Supremacy

10.1002/smj.359

Davis G. F., 1992, Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Davis J. P., 2005, Acad. Management Rev.

Demsetz H., 1988, J. Law, Econom. Organ., 4, 141

10.2307/2095101

10.2307/256405

10.2307/2393235

10.1287/orsc.7.6.649

10.2307/256434

10.2307/258557

Eisenhardt K. M., 2005, Managerial Decision Econom.

10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E

10.2307/2393938

10.2307/2989899

10.1287/orsc.7.5.470

10.1287/orsc.7.3.255

10.2307/3069398

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1193::AID-SMJ5>3.0.CO;2-F

Gawer A., 2002, Platform Leadership

Gilbert C., 2005, Organ. Sci.

10.2307/2393936

10.1002/smj.419

10.1086/228311

10.1287/orsc.7.4.375

10.1086/261729

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<339::AID-SMJ883>3.0.CO;2-7

10.1002/smj.427

10.1093/jleo/15.1.74

10.1086/316965

10.5465/amj.2005.17407912

Jacobides M. G., 2005, Strategic Management J., 26

10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1061::AID-SMJ116>3.0.CO;2-G

10.2307/255737

Klein B., 1988, J. Law, Econom. Organ., 4, 199

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<405::AID-SMJ103>3.0.CO;2-5

10.1287/orsc.12.6.744.10082

10.1287/orsc.3.3.383

10.1287/orsc.7.5.502

10.1177/001872679104400104

10.1287/orsc.7.5.577

10.5465/AMBPP.2003.13793226

Masten S. E., 1991, The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development, 196, 10.1093/oso/9780195065909.003.0012

10.1287/orsc.1050.0125

10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00004.x

10.2307/256654

10.2307/3556680

10.1287/orsc.1040.0093

O’Mahony S., 2005, American Sociological Association

Penrose E., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm

Pfeffer J., 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199809)19:9<853::AID-SMJ977>3.0.CO;2-B

10.2307/2393636

Porter M. E., 1980, Competitive Strategy

Porter M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance

10.1002/smj.4250070602

Pralahad C. K., 1990, Harvard Bus. Rev., 68, 79

10.1287/orsc.4.3.454

10.1287/orsc.7.4.400

10.2307/1252085

Rindova V. P., 2001, The Entrepreneurship Dynamic, 236

10.2307/3069400

Santos F. M. Constructing niches and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial action in nascent fields. (2003) (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) . Unpublished dissertation, Department of Management Science and Engineering

10.5465/AMBPP.2004.13863681

Shelanski H. A., 1995, J. Law, Econom. Organ., 11, 335

10.2307/3069418

Stinchcombe A. L., 1965, Handbook of Organizations, 142

10.2307/3116183

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199801)19:1<1::AID-SMJ938>3.0.CO;2-5

10.1016/0167-2681(82)90003-8

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action

10.2307/3069286

10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R

Walker G., 1994, Strategic Management J., 5, 583

10.2307/2393030

10.1287/orsc.6.3.280

Weick K., 1995, Sensemaking in Organizations

10.1002/smj.4250050207

Williamson O. E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications

10.1086/227496

Williamson O. E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism

10.2307/2393356

10.2307/2667110