Deciphering genotype-by-environment interaction in barley genotypes using different adaptability and stability methods

Alireza Pour-Aboughadareh1, Ali Barati1, Ahmad Gholipoor2, Hassan Zali3, Akbar Marzooghian4, Shir Ali Koohkan5, Kamal Shahbazi-Homonloo6, Arash Houseinpour6
1Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
2Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gonbad, Iran
3Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Darab, Iran
4Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ahvaz Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ahvaz, Iran
5Horticulture Crops Research Department, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Zabol, Iran
6Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Moghan, Iran

Tóm tắt

Dissection of genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) effects has a key role in identifying stable high-yielding genotypes across various environments before commercial release. This study sought to assess the GEI effect and to identify superior barley genotypes using 32 parametric and non-parametric stability statistics. Eighteen new promising genotypes along with one improved cultivar (as check) were evaluated across ten environments during the 2019–2021 cropping seasons in the warm climate of Iran. The AMMI analysis of variance indicated that genotype, environment, and GEI effects were significant for grain yield. Furthermore, partitioning of the GEI effect showed that the first six interaction principal components (IPCA1–IPCA6) were highly significant. Multivariate analyses classified all measured statistics into five groups based on the dynamic and static concepts of stability. Among the stability statistics, HMGV, RPGV, HMRPGV, CV, NP(2), NP(3), NP(4), KR, S(3), and S(6) showed a dynamic concept of stability. Based on all methods, genotypes G2, G3, G9, G11, G14, and G17 were identified as stable high-yielding genotypes. In general, based on all of the used approaches, G9 and G11 were identified as the best genotypes for cultivation in the warm regions of Iran; hence, these genotypes can be considered for commercial release.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahakpaz F, Abdi H, Neyestani E, Hesami A, Mohammadi B, Nader Mahmoudi K, Abedi-Asl G, Jazayeri Noshabadi MR, Ahakpaz F, Alipour H (2021) Genotype-by-environment interaction analysis for grain yield of barley genotypes under dryland conditions and the role of monthly rainfall. Agric Water Manag 245:10665 Ahmadi J, Vaezi B, Shaabani A, Khademi K, Fabriki-Ourang S, Pour-Aboughadareh A (2015) Non-parametric measures for yield stability in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) advanced lines in semi warm regions. J Agri Sci Technol 17:1825–1838 Anuradha N, Patro TSSK, Singamsetti A, Sandhya Rani Y, Triveni U, Nirmala Kumari A, Govanakoppa N, Lakshmi Pathy T, Tonapi VA (2022) Comparative study of AMMI- and BLUP-based simultaneous selection for grain yield and stability of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] genotypes. Front Plant Sci 12:786839 Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PCS. 2004. Modelos biome´tricos aplicados ao melhoramento genetico. UFV, Vicosade. de Mendiburu F (2015) agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.28. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae. Accessed 20 Aug 2022 Enyew M, Feyissa T, Geleta M, Tesfaye K, Hammenhag C, Carlsson AS (2021) Genotype by environment inter-action, correlation, AMMI, GGE biplot and cluster analysis for grain yield and other agronomic traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). PLoS ONE 16:e0258211 Fatemi F, Kianersi F, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Poczai P, Jadidi O (2022) Overview of identified genomic regions associated with various agronomic and physiological traits in barley under abiotic stresses. Appl Sci 12:5189 Ghazvini H, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sharifalhosseini M, Razavi SA, Mohammadi S, Ghasemi Kalkhoran M, Fathi Hafshejani A, Khakizadeh G (2018) Phenotypic stability analysis of barley promising lines in the cold regions of Iran. Crop Breed Journal 8:17–29 Ghazvini H, Bagherikia S, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sharifalhossaini M, Razavi SA, Mohammadi S, GhasemiKalkhoran M, Fathihafshejani A, Khakizade G (2022) GGE biplot analysis of promising barley lines in the cold regions of Iran. J Crop Improv 36:461–547 Husson F, Josse J, Le S, Mazet J (2020) FactoMineR: multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining. R package version 2.4. http://factominer.free.fr. Accessed 20 Aug 2022 Kassambara A (2020) factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R Package Version 1:7 Kendal E, Karaman M, Tekdel S, Dogan S (2019) Analysis of promising barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) lines performance by AMMI and GGE biplot in multiple traits and environment. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17:5219–5233 Khalili M, Pour-Aboughadareh A (2016) Parametric and nonparametric measures for evaluating yield stability and adaptability in barley doubled haploid lines. J Agri Sci Technol 18:789–803 Kolde R (2019) pheatmap: pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2022 Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP (1986) Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci 26:894–900 Nataraj V, Bhartiya A, Singh CP, Devi NH, Deshmukh MP, Verghese P, Singh K, Mehtra SP, Kumari V, Shivakumar M, Kumawat G, Ratnaparkhe MB, Satpute GK, Rajesh V, Chandra S, Ramteke R, Khandekar N, Gupta S (2021) WAASB based stability analysis and simultaneous selection for grain yield and early maturity in soybean. Agron J 113:3089–3099 Olivoto T, Lucio AD (2020) Metan: an R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 11:783–789 Olivoto T, Lucio AD, da Silva JA, Marchioro VS, de Souza VQ, Jost E (2019) Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials I: combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy 111:2949–2960 Piepho HS (1999) Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agron J 91:154–160 Pinthus JM (1973) Estimate of genotype value: a proposed method. Euphytica 22:121–123 Pour-Aboughadareh A, Yousefan M, Moradkhani H, Poczai P, Siddique KHM (2019) STABILITYSOFT: a new online program to calculate parametric and nonparametric stability statistics for crop traits. Appl Plant Sci 7:e01211 Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sanjani S, Nikkhah-Chamanabad H, Asadi A, Amini A (2021) Identification of salt-tolerant barley genotypes using multiple-traits index and yield performance at the early growth and maturity stages. Bull Natl Res Cent 45:117 Pour-Aboughadareh A, Barati A, Koohkan SA, Jabari M, Marzoghian A, Gholipoor A, Shahbazi-Homonloo K, Zali H, Poodineh O, Kheirgo M (2022a) Dissection of genotype-by-environment interaction and yield stability analysis in barley using AMMI model and stability statistics. Bull Natl Res Cent 46:19 Pour-Aboughadareh A, Khalili M, Poczai P, Olivoto T (2022b) Stability indices to deciphering the genotype by-environment interaction (GEI) effect: an applicable review for use in plant breeding programs. Plants 11:414 R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria Schreiber M, Mascher M, Wright J et al (2020) A Genome assembly of the barley “transformation reference” cultivar golden promise. G3 10: 1823–1827 Shukla GK (1972) Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype–environmental components of variability. Heredity 28:237–245 Singamsetti A, Shahi JP, Zaidi PH, Seetharam K, Vinayan MT, Kumar M, Singla S, Shikha K, Madankar K (2021) Genotype × environment interaction and selection of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids across moisture regimes. Field Crop Res 270:108224 Tai GCC (1971) Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional trials. Crop Sci 11:184–190 Tize I, Fotos AK, Nukenine EN et al (2021) New cassava germplasm for food and nutritional security in Central Africa. Sci Rep 11:7394 Vaezi B, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Mohammadi R, Armion M, Mehraban A, Hossein-Pour T, Dorri M (2017) GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of barley yield performance in Iran. Cereal Res Commun 45:500–511 Vaezi B, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Mehraban A, Hossein-Pour T, Mohammadi R, Armion M, Dorri M (2018) The use of parametric and non-parametric measures for selecting stable and adapted barley lines. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:597–611 Vaezi B, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Mohammadi R, Mehraban A, Hossein-Pour T, Koohkan E, Ghasemi S, Moradkhani H, Siddique KHM (2019) Integrating different stability models to investigate genotype × environment interactions and identify stable and high-yielding barley genotypes. Euphytica 215:63 Yan W, Hunt LA (2001) Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat in Ontario. Crop Sci 41:19–25