The multilevel protection of the right of property in Europe
Tóm tắt
Within the European legal area, the safeguard of the right to property takes place at the interface between international law, EU law and each national legal system. Each of these laws has its own scope of application and level of protection, which partially differs from those of the others, as well as its own supreme jurisdiction which seeks for itself the final word in the field of human rights law. This complex background raises questions concerning the law applicable to interferences in the relevant rights, as well as the terms of the interaction among legal orders and their respective supreme courts, in a context of dialogue and potential conflict that requires consistent articulation in a system in the interest of legal certainty of the right’s holders. This paper provides an overview of the current constitutional system of protection of the right to property in Europe against interferences caused in its sphere by public authorities, both national (and subnational) or European. To that end, this article considers both the legal pluralism perspective along with the need for a systematic scheme of relations between legal orders.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akkermans B, Raemaekers E (2010) Article 345 TFEU (ex Article 295 EC), its meanings and interpretations. Eur Law J 16(3):292–314
Alexander GS, Peñalver EM (2013) An introduction to property theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Allen T (2003) The autonomous meaning of ‘Possessions’ under the European convention on human rights. In: Cooke E (ed) Modern studies in property law, vol 2. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 57–77
Alonso García R (2014) El juez nacional en la encrucijada europea de los derechos fundamentales. Civitas/Thomson Reuters, Cizur Menor
Arai-Takahashi Y (2002) The margin of appreciation doctrine and the principle of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the ECHR. Intersentia, Antewerp-Oxford-New York
Arroyo Jiménez L (2011) Sobre la primera cuestión prejudicial planteada por el Tribunal Constitucional. Bases, contenidos y consecuencias. Work Paper IDEIR 8
Barcelona Llop J (2013) Propiedad, privación de la propiedad y expropiación forzosa en el sistema del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid
Barnard C (2013) The charter in time of crisis: a case study on dismissal. In: Countouris N, Freedland M (eds) Resocialising Europe in a time of crisis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 250–277
Barnés Vázquez J, Guichot Reina E (1995) La jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos sobre la Propiedad Privada. Barnés Vázquez J (coord) Propiedad, expropiación y responsabilidad. La garantía indemnizatoria en el Derecho europeo y comparado. Tecnos, Madrid, pp 124–150
Besselink LFM (2008) The European Union and the European convention on human rights after the Lisbon treaty: from Boshporus sovereign immunity to full scrutiny? http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1132788. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
Cortés Martín JM (2013) Sobre el sistema unionista de protección de los derechos humanos y la ruptura de su presunción de equivalencia con el CEDH. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 46:935–971
Costello C (2006) The Bosphorus Ruling of the European Court of Human Rights: fundamental Rights and Blurred Boundaries in Europe. Human Rights Law Review 6(1):87–130
Díez-Hochleitner J (2013) El derecho a la última palabra: ¿Tribunales constitucionales o Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión? Work paper IDEIR 17
Douglas-Scott S (2006) A tale of two courts: luxembourg, Strasbourg and the growing European Human Rights Acquis. Common Market Law Rev 43(3):629–665
Douglas-Scott S (2011) The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon. Human Rights Law Rev 2011:645–682
Eckes C (2007) Does the European court of human rights provide protection from the European community? The case of Posphorus Airways. Eur Public Law 13(1):47–67
Gambaro A (2011) Property rights in comparative perspective: why property is so ancient and durable. Tulane Eur Civil Law Forum 26:205–229
García Roca J (2010) El margen de apreciación nacional en la interpretación del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos: soberanía e integración. Civitas/Thomson Reuters, Cizur Menor
Garlicki L (2008) Cooperation of courts: the role of supranational jurisdictions in Europe. Int J Const Law 6:509–530
Hancox E (2013) The meaning of ‘implementing’ EU law under Article 51(1) of the Charter: Åkerberg Fransson. Common Market Law Rev 50(5):1411–1431
Iglesias Sánchez S (2013) La confirmación del ámbito de aplicación de la Carta y su interrelación con el estándar de protección. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 46:1157–1175
Kingreen T (2013) Die Grundrechte des Grundgesetzes im europäischen Grundrechtsföderalismus. Juristen Zeitung 68(17):801–811
Kuhnert K (2006) Bosphorus, Double standards in European human rights protection? Utrecht Law Rev 2(2):177–189
Ladenburger C (2012) European Union Institutional Report. In: Laffranque J (ed) The protection of fundamental rights post-Lisbon: the interaction between the charter of fundamental rights of the European union, the European convention on human rights and national constitutions. Tartu University Press, Tallin, pp 145–168
Lock T (2010) EU accession to the ECHR: implications for the judicial review in Strasbourg. Eur Law Rev 35(6):777–798
Losada Fraga F, Juutilainen T, Havu K, Vesala J (2012) Property and European integration: dimensions of article 345 TFEU. Helsinki legal studies research paper 17
O’Meara NO (2010) A more secure Europe of rights? The European court of human rights, the court of justice of the European union and EU accession to the ECHR. Ger Law J 12(10):1813–1832
Ortega Bernardo J (2007) Límites constitucionales en la adopción por ley de medidas concretas de carácter administrativo: comentario a la STC 48/2005, sobre la Ley de expropiación para la ampliación de la sede del Parlamento de Canarias. Revista de Administración Pública 172:293–305
Pardo Falcon J (1995) El Tribunal Constitucional y la propiedad. In: Barnés J (coord) Propiedad, expropiación y responsabilidad. La garantía indemnizatoria en el Derecho europeo y comparado. Tecnos/Junta de Andalucía, Madrid, pp 67–87
Praduroux S (2013) The protection of property rights in comparative perspective: a study on the interaction between European human rights law and Italian and French property law. Europa Law Publishing, Groningen
Rey Martínez F (2007) El nuevo criterio de «la tutela materialmente equivalente» en relación con las expropiaciones legislativas (la STC 48/2005). Teoría y Realidad Constitucional 19:397–414
Riza Çoban A (2003) Protection of property rights within the European convention on human rights. Ashgate, Aldershot
Rodríguez de Santiago JM (2008) Las garantías constitucionales de la propiedad y de la expropiación forzosa a los treinta años de la Constitución Española. Revista de Administración Pública 177:157–194
Saiz Arnaiz A (2001) La apertura constitucional al Derecho internacional y europeo de los derechos humanos. El artículo 10.2 de la Constitución Española. Consejo General del Poder Judicial, Madrid
Sarmiento D (2013) Who’s afraid of the Charter? The Court of Justice, national courts and the new framework of fundamental rights protection in Europe. Common Market Law Rev 50(5):1267–1304
Sumner G (2008) We’ll sometimes have Strasbourg: privileged status of community law before the European court of human rights. Irish Stud Law Rev 16:127–170
Torres Pérez A (2009) Conflicts of rights in the European union. A theory of supranational adjudication. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Torres Pérez A (2012) Constitutional dialogue on the European arrest warrant: the Spanish constitutional court knocking on Luxembourg’s door. Eur Const Law Rev 8:105–127
Utrilla Fernández-Bermejo D (2012) Las garantías del derecho de propiedad privada en Europa: Derecho de la Unión Europea y Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Civitas, Madrid
Utrilla Fernández-Bermejo D (2014) Tutela judicial, garantía patrimonial e insolvencia de la Administración: acerca de los asuntos De Luca c. Italia y Pennino c. Italia (SSTEDH de 24 de septiembre de 2013. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional Europeo 21: forthcoming
Van Drooghenbroeck S (2000/2001) The concept of ‘possessions’ within the meaning of Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The European Legal Forum 7:437–444
Von Bogdandy A, Schill S (2011) Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Rev 48(5):1417–1453
Voβkuhle A (2010) Protection of human rights in the European union. Multilevel cooperation on human rights between the European constitutional courts. http://www.ourcommonfuture.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dateien/Reden/Vosskuhle.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2014
Weiβ W (2011) Human rights in the EU: rethinking the role of the European convention on Human rights after Lisbon. Eur Const Law Rev 7(1):64–95
Winisdoerffer Y (1998) Margin of appreciation and article 1 of protocol no. 1. Human Rights Law J 1:18–20