Quality of life after stroke: a prospective longitudinal study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 20 - Trang 799-806 - 2010
William E. Haley1, David L. Roth2, Brett Kissela3, Martinique Perkins2, George Howard2
1School of Aging Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
2Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
3Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA

Tóm tắt

To measure the impact of stroke on quality of life (QOL), and analyze whether race, gender, age, income, or living alone moderated those changes, using prospective longitudinal methods. Participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study without history of stroke completed baseline SF-12 Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) measures and a depression scale. Measures were repeated (M = 1231 days later) by 136 participants after an incident medically documented stroke and by 136 demographically matched stroke-free controls. Stroke participants showed significant worsening than controls in all three QOL measures. Controls also declined significantly in PCS. Standardized effect sizes for stroke versus control participants after adjusting for covariates were similar across the three measures and ranged from .366 to .465 standard deviation units. Stroke survivors who lived alone were at greater risk for increases in depressive symptoms. Multiple declines in QOL occur after stroke, and social isolation heightens risk for increasing depression after stroke. Our prospective design and use of a population-based sample with matched controls suggests similar effects in both physical health and mental health QOL domains and offers unique strengths in understanding the impact of stroke on QOL.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Haley, W. E., Allen, J. Y., Grant, J. S., Clay, O. J., Perkins, M., & Roth, D. L. (2009). Problems and benefits reported by stroke family caregivers: Results from a prospective epidemiological study. Stroke, 40, 2129–2133.

Gargano, J. W., Reeves, M. J., & for the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry Michigan Prototype Investigators. (2007). Sex differences in stroke recovery and stroke-specific quality of life: Results from a statewide stroke registry. Stroke, 38, 2541–2548.

Stansbury, J. P., Jia, H., Williams, L. S., Vogel, W. B., & Duncan, P. W. (2005). Ethnic disparities in stroke: Epidemiology, acute care, and postacute outcomes. Stroke, 36, 374–386.

Husted, J. A., Cook, R. J., Farewell, V. T., & Gladman, D. D. (2000). Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 459–468.

Howard, V. J., Cushman, M., Pulley, L., Gomez, C. R., Go, R. C., Prineas, R. J., et al. (2005). The REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study: Objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology, 25, 135–143.

Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.