Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting

Emerald - Tập 15 Số 2 - Trang 223-250 - 2002
Carol A. Adams1
1University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Tóm tắt

Prior empirical research into factors which are influential in determining the extent and nature of corporate social reporting has primarily been concerned with the impact of corporate characteristics (such as size and industry grouping) or general contextual factors (such as the social, political and economic context). Relatively little prior work has examined the internal contextual factors and their impact on reporting despite increasing emphasis in the field of practice on reporting processes and governance structures. In this study interviews were conducted with seven large multinational companies in the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors of the UK and Germany in order to identify any internal contextual factors influencing the nature and extent of reporting. The work highlights the lack of explanatory power of the existing social reporting theories. A more inclusive model of corporate social reporting is presented.


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, C.A. (1999), The Nature and Processes of Corporate Reporting on Ethical Issues, CIMA Rresearch Monograph, CIMA, London. Adams, C.A. and Harte, G.F. (1998), “The changing portrayal of the employment of women in British banks’ and retail companies’ corporate annual reports”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 781‐812. Adams, C.A. and Harte, G.F. (2000), “Making discrimination visible”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 56‐79. Adams, C.A. and Kuasirikun, N. (2000), “A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 53‐80. Adams, C.A., Coutts, A. and Harte, G.F. (1995a), “Corporate equal opportunities (non), disclosure”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 87‐108. Adams, C.A., Hill, W.Y. and Roberts, C.B. (1995b), Environmental, Employee and Ethical Reporting in Europe, ACCA Research Report No. 41, ACCA, London. Adams, C.A., Hill, W.Y. and Roberts, C.B. (1998), “Corporate social reporting practices in western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 1‐21. Andrew, B.H., Gul, F.A., Guthrie, J.E. and Teoh, H.Y. (1989), “A note on corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: the case of Malaysia and Singapore”, British Accounting Review, December, pp. 371‐6. Arnold, P. and Hammond, T. (1994), “The role of accounting in ideological conflict: lessons from the South African divestment movement”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 111‐26. Belkaoui, A. and Karpik, R.G. (1989), “Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 36‐51. Brown, N. and Deegan, C. (1998), “The public disclosure of environmental performance information – a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 21‐41. Burchell, S., Clubb, C. and Hopwood, A.G. (1985), “Accounting in its social context: towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 381‐413. Campbell, D.J. (2000), “Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosures in Marks and Spencer Plc corporate reports, 1969‐1997”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 80‐100. Chetley, A. (1986), “Not good enough for us but fit for them – an examination of the chemical and pharmaceutical export trades”, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 9, pp. 155‐80. Chew, R., Teeling‐Smith, G. and Wells, N. (1985), Pharmaceuticals in Seven Nations, Office of Health Economics, London. Cooper, C. and Puxty, A. (1996), “On the proliferation of accounting (his)tories”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 7, pp. 285‐313. Cowen, S.S., Ferreri, L.B. and Parker, L.D. (1987), “The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency based analysis”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12, pp. 111‐22. Deegan, C. and Gordon, B. (1996), “A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 26, pp. 187‐99. Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982), Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Edwards, D. (1998), The Link between Company Environmental and Financial Performance, Earthscan, London. Ethical Consumer (1994), “Special report on the pharmaceutical industry”, Ethical Consumer, Issue 32. Gerhardy, P. (1991), “Culture and accounting principles – the case of West Germany”, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 19‐29. Gray, R.H., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995), “Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 47‐77. Gray, S.J. (1988), “Towards a theory of cultural influences on the development of accounting systems internationally”, Abacus, March, pp. 1‐15. Global Reporting Initiative (2000), Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental and Social Performance, Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, MA. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L.D. (1989a), “Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 9, pp. 343‐52. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L.D. (1989b), “Continuity and discontinuity in corporate social reporting: a critical case study of BHP reporting 1885‐1985”, working paper. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L.D. (1990), “Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis”, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 3, pp. 159‐75. Hackston, D. and Milne, M.J. (1996), “Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 77‐108. Harte, G., Lewis, L. and Owen, D. (1991), “Ethical investment and the corporate reporting function”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 2, pp. 227‐53. Hofstede, G. (1984), “Cultural dimensions in management and planning”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 81‐99. Hogner, R.H. (1982), “Corporate social reporting: eight decades of development at US Steel”, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 4, pp. 45‐55. Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility (1999a), AccountAbility 1000 (AA1000): A Foundation Standard in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting, AccountAbility, London. Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility (1999b), AccountAbility 1000 (AA1000), Framework: Standards, Guidelines and Professional Qualification, AccountAbility, London. Kamp‐Roelands, N. (1999), “Audits of environmental reports: are we witnessing the emergence of another expectation gap”, Koninklijik Nederlands Instituut van Registeraccountants, Amsterdam. Lewis, L. and Unerman, J. (1999), “Ethical relativism: a reason for differences in corporate social reporting?”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 10, pp. 521‐47. Lynn, M. (1992), “A note on corporate social disclosure in Hong Kong”, British Accounting Review, June, pp. 105‐10. McCormick, J. (1991), British Politics and the Environment, Earthscan Publications, London. Muller‐Rommel, F. (1989), New Politics in Western Europe: The Rise and Success of Green Politics and Alternative Lists, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. Nees, K.E. and Mirza, A.M. (1991), “Corporate social disclosure: a note on a test of agency theory”, British Accounting Review, September, pp. 211‐18. Niskala, M. and Pretes, M. (1995), “Environmental reporting in Finland: a note on the use of annual reports”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, August, pp. 457‐66. Otley, D. (1980), “The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and progress”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 413‐28. Owen, D.L., Swift, T.A., Humphrey, C. and Bowerman, M. (2000), “The new social audits: accountability, management capture or the agenda of social champions?”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 81‐98. Patten, D.M. (1990), “The market reaction to social responsibility disclosures”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 575‐87. Patten, D.M. (1991), “Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 297‐308. Patten, D.M. (1992), “Intra‐industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 471‐5. Roberts, C.B. (1990), International Trends in Social and Employee Reporting, ACCA Occasional Research Paper No. 6, ACCA, London. Roberts, C.B. (1991), “Environmental disclosures: a note on reporting practices in mainland Europe”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 62‐71. Roberts, R.W. (1992), “Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17, pp. 595‐612. Rockness, J. and Williams, P.F. (1988), “A descriptive study of social responsibility mutual funds”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 4, pp. 397‐411. The Times 1000 (1995), Times Books, London. Tinker, T. and Neimark, M. (1987), “The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors: 1917‐1976”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12, pp. 71‐88. Trotman, K.T. and Bradley, G.W. (1981), “Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 6, pp. 355‐62. United Nations (1992), Environmental Disclosures: International Survey of Corporate Reporting Practices, United Nations Economic and Social Council E/C.10/AC.3/1992/3, New York, NY. United Nations (1994), Environmental Disclosures: International Survey of Corporate Reporting Practices, United Nations Economic and Social Council E/C.10/AC.3/1994/4, New York, NY. United Nations Environment Programme (1999), Global Environment Outlook 2000, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Walden, W.D. and Schwartz, B.N. (1997), “Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 16, pp. 125‐54.