The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles

Abdi, 2010, The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: a framework for the use of metadiscourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1669, 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001 Abdollahzadeh, 2011, Poring over the findings: interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288, 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019 Amiryousefi, 2010, Metadiscourse: definitions, issues and its implications for English teachers, English Language Teaching, 3, 159, 10.5539/elt.v3n4p159 Bloch, 1995, A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse Brett, 1994, A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles, English for Specific Purposes, 13, 47, 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8 Connor, 1996 Connor, 2011 Connor, 2005, Tertium comparationis: a vital component in contrastive research methodology, 153 Crismore, 1984, 26 Crismore, 1989, Mr. Darwin and his readers: exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of Ethos, Rhetoric Review, 8, 91, 10.1080/07350198909388880 Dahl, 2004, Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?, Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807, 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004 Del Saz-Rubio, 2011, A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences, English for Specific Purposes, 30, 258, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002 Gillaerts, 2010, Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 128, 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004 Hirano, 2009, Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: a comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English, English for Specific Purposes, 28, 240, 10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001 Hu, 2011, Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: a comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007 Hu, 2015, Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles, English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12, 10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002 Hyland, 1996, Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum, System, 24, 477, 10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00043-7 Hyland, 1998, Persuasion and context: the pragmatics of academic metadiscourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437, 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5 Hyland, 2002, Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing, Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091, 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8 Hyland, 2005 Hyland, 2005, Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse, Discourse Studies, 7, 173, 10.1177/1461445605050365 Hyland, 2007, Applying a gloss: exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse, Applied Linguistics, 28, 266, 10.1093/applin/amm011 Hyland, 2004, Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal, Applied Linguistics, 25, 156, 10.1093/applin/25.2.156 Hyland, 2005, Hooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts, English for Specific Purposes, 24, 123, 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 Lim, 2011, ‘Paving the way for research findings’: writers' rhetorical choices in education and applied linguistics, Discourse Studies, 13, 725, 10.1177/1461445611421364 Loi, 2013, Metadiscourse in English and Chinese research article introductions, Discourse Studies, 15, 129, 10.1177/1461445612471476 Mauranen, 1993, Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economics texts, English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3, 10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I McGrath, 2012, Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: linking discourse features to disciplinary practices, English for Specific Purposes, 31, 161, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002 Moreno, 1997, Genre constraints across languages: causal metatext in Spanish and English RAs, English for Specific Purposes, 16, 161, 10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00023-3 Moreno, 2004, Retrospective labeling in premise–conclusion metatext: an English–Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 321, 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.005 Mur-Dueñas, 2011, An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3068, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002 Nwogu, 1997, The medical research paper: structure and functions, English for Specific Purposes, 16, 119, 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4 Ohta, 1991, Evidentiality and politeness in Japanese, Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2, 183, 10.5070/L422005143 Peterlin, 2005, Text-organizing metatext in research articles: an English–Slovene contrastive analysis, English for Specific Purposes, 24, 307, 10.1016/j.esp.2004.11.001 QSR International, 2010 Scollon, 1994, As a matter of fact: the changing ideology of authorship and responsibility in discourse, World Englishes, 13, 34, 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1994.tb00281.x Shi, 2002, How Western-trained Chinese TESOL professionals publish in their home environment, TESOL Quarterly, 36, 625, 10.2307/3588245 Simin, 2009, Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL writing, Asian EFL Journal, 11, 230 Soler, 2011, Comparative and contrastive observations on scientific titles written in English and Spanish, English for Specific Purposes, 30, 124, 10.1016/j.esp.2010.09.002 Steffensen, 1996, Metadiscourse and text pragmatics: how students write after learning about metadiscourse, Vol. 7, 153 Vande Kopple, 1985, Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 36, 82, 10.2307/357609 Vergaro, 2004, Discourse strategies of Italian and English sales promotion letters, English for Specific Purposes, 3, 181, 10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00003-6 Vergaro, 2011, Shades of impersonality: rhetorical positioning in the academic writing of Italian students of English, Linguistics and Education, 22, 118, 10.1016/j.linged.2010.11.001 Zarei, 2007, Metadiscourse in academic prose: a contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles, The Asian ESP Journal, 3, 24 Zarei, 2010, A contrastive study on metadiscourse elements used in humanities vs. non-humanities across Persian and English, English Language Teaching, 4, 42, 10.5539/elt.v4n1p42