Enhancing the contribution of urban living labs to sustainability transformations: towards a meta-lab approach
Tóm tắt
The contribution of the first generation of urban living labs (ULLs) to system-wide sustainability transformations is thus far less than expected. A possible explanation for this can be found in the focus of most ULLs on local, highly contextualized knowledge, and a missing link to system-wide transformations through diffusion and upscaling beyond the geographic boundaries of the lab. Meta-learning, i.e., learning across multiple, distributed experiments, through networked ULLs seems to offer a way forward. However, the literature on city networks shows that meta-learning cannot be effectively facilitated in horizontal networks without a learning infrastructure. To address this shortcoming and inspire a second generation of ULLs, this Perspective paper outlines a meta-lab approach actively facilitating the contribution of local living labs to wider sustainability transformations. We see a meta-lab as a transurban multi-actor network to connect and, where possible, align the learning processes across thematically related ULLs in different urban contexts through a central learning agenda. The meta-lab approach respects and supports local learning agendas and their focus on local solutions for local problems, while acknowledging and utilizing the potential of local experiments to contribute to a central learning agenda. Our paper argues that a meta-lab approach can act as a catalyst of learning in two important ways: (1) by accelerating local experimentation and learning processes by feeding them with lessons from other locations; and (2) by facilitating a more focused – local and transurban – learning process through a shared learning agenda. The meta-lab approach thus stimulates urban sustainability transformations by supporting faster, more focused and wider learning about effective innovations. We conclude this paper by outlining how common pitfalls in transurban learning can be avoided by a careful design of the meta-lab, or by meeting certain conditions when implementing this design.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Betsill MM, Bulkeley H. Transnational networks and global environmental governance: the cities for climate protection program. Int Stud Q. 2004;48(2):47–493.
Bulkeley H. Urban sustainability: learning from best practice? Environ Plan A Econ Space. 2006;38(6):1029–44.
Bulkeley HA, Edwards GAS, Fuller S. Contesting climate justice in the city: examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;25:31–40.
Bulkeley H, Coenen L, Frantzeskaki N, Hartmann C, Kronsell A, Mai L, et al. Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2017;22:13–7.
Bulkeley H, Marvin S, Voytenko Palgan Y, McCormick K, Breitfuss-Loidl M, Mai L, et al. Urban living laboratories: conducting the experimental city? Eur Urban Region Stud. 2019;26(4):317–35.
Castán Broto V. Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World Dev. 2017;93:1–15.
Dabrowski M, Varjú V, Amenta L. Transferring circular economy solutions across differentiated territories: understanding and overcoming the barriers for knowledge transfer. Urban Plan. 2019;4(3):52–62.
Davidson K, Coenen L, Gleeson B. A decade of C40: research insights and agendas for City networks. Global Policy. 2019;10(4):697–708.
Dijk M, De Kraker J, Hommels A. Anticipating constraints on upscaling from Urban innovation experiments. Sustainability. 2018;10(8):2796.
Eneqvist E, Karvonen A. Experimental governance and urban planning futures: five strategic functions for municipalities in local innovation. Urban Plan. 2021;6(1):183–94.
Evans J, Karvonen A, Raven R, editors. The Experimental City. Oxon & New York: Routledge; 2016.
Evans J, Vácha T, Kok H, Watson K. How cities learn: from experimentation to transformation. Urban Plan. 2021;6(1):171–82. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3545.
Frantzeskaki N. How City-networks are shaping and failing innovations in Urban institutions for sustainability and resilience. Global Policy. 2019;10(4):712–4.
Frantzeskaki N, Broto VC, Coenen L, Loorbach D. Urban sustainability transitions: the dynamics and opportunities of sustainability transitions in cities. In: Frantzeskaki N, Broto VC, Coenen L, Loorbach D, editors. Urban sustainability transitions: Taylor & Francis; 2017.
Grandin J, Haarstad H, Kjærås K, Bouzarovski S. The politics of rapid urban transformation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2018;31:16–22.
Hakelberg L. Governance by diffusion: transnational municipal networks and the spread of local climate strategies in Europe. Global Environ Politics. 2014;14(1):107–29.
Heikkinen M, Ylä-Anttila T, Juhola S. Incremental, reformistic or transformational: what kind of change do C40 cities advocate to deal with climate change? J Environ Policy Plan. 2019;21(1):90–103.
Hodson M, Evans J, Schliwa G. Conditioning experimentation: the struggle for place-based discretion in shaping urban infrastructures. Environ Plan C Politics Space. 2018;36(8):37–51.
JPI Urban Europe. Strategic research and innovation agenda 2.0. 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.jpi-urbaneurope.eu/app/uploads/2019/02/SRIA2.0.pdf.
Karvonen A. The city of permanent experiments? In: Turnheim B, Kivimaa P, Berkhout F, editors. Innovating climate governance: moving beyond experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. p. 201–15.
Karvonen A, Van Heur B. Urban laboratories: experiments in reworking cities. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2014;38(2):379–92.
Kern K, Bulkeley H. Cities, europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. J Common Mark Stud. 2009;47(2):309–32.
Kronsell, Mukhtar-Landgren A, Mukhtar-Landgren D. Experimental governance: the role of municipalities in urban living labs. Eur Plan Stud. 2018;26(5):988–1007.
Lee T. Network comparison of socialization, learning and collaboration in the C40 cities climate group. J Environ Policy Plan. 2019;21(1):104–15.
Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Avelino F, Von Wirth T, Frantzeskaki N. Transformative innovation and translocal diffusion. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 2020;35:251–60.
Marvin S, Bulkeley H, Mai L, McComerick K, Voytenko Palgan Y, editors. Urban Living Labs. Experimenting with City Futures. Oxon & New York: Routledge; 2018.
Moloney S, Horne R. Low carbon urban transitioning: from local experimentation to urban transformation? Sustainability. 2015;7(3):2437–53.
Nagorny-Koring NC. Leading the way with examples and ideas? Governing climate change in German municipalities through best practices. J Environ Policy Plan. 2019;21(1):46–60.
Peng Y, Wei Y, Bai X. Scaling urban sustainability experiments: contextualization as an innovation. J Clean Prod. 2019;227:302–12.
Puerari E, De Koning J, Von Wirth T, Karré P, Mulder I, Loorbach D. Co-creation dynamics in Urban living labs. Sustainability. 2018;10:1893.
Ryghaug M, Skjølsvold TM. Pilot society and the energy transition: the co-shaping of innovation, participation and politics: Springer Nature; 2021.
Sabel CF, Zeitlin J. Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur Law J. 2008;14(3):271–327.
Schäpke N, Stelzer F, Caniglia G, Bergmann M, Wanner M, Singer-Brodowski M, et al. Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Soc. 2018;27:85–96.
Scholl C, De Kraker J. Urban planning by experiment: practices, outcomes, and impacts. Urban Plan. 2021a;6(1):156–60.
Scholl C, De Kraker J. The practice of urban experimentation in Dutch City labs. Urban Plan. 2021b;6(1):161–70.
Scholl C, Kemp R. City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Plan. 2016;1(4):89–102.
Scholl C, De Kraker J, Hoeflehner T, Eriksen MA, Wlasak P, Drage T. Transitioning Urban experiments. Reflections on Doing Action Research with Urban Labs. GAIA. 2018;27(S1):78–84.
Sengers F, Wieczorek AJ, Raven R. Experimenting for sustainability transitions: a systematic literature review. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2019;145:153–64.
Shefer I. Policy transfer in city-to-city cooperation: implications for urban climate governance learning. J Environ Policy Plann. 2019;21(1):61–75.
Von Wirth T, Fuenfschilling L, Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L. Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. Eur Plan Stud. 2018;27(2):229–57.
Von Wirth T, Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D. Urban living labs as inter-boundary spaces for sustainability transitions? In: Handbook on planning and complexity: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2020.
Wolfram M, Van der Heijden J, Juhola S, Patterson J. Learning in urban climate governance: concepts, key issues and challenges. J Environ Policy Plan. 2019;21(1):1–15.