Estimating Telephone Demand with State Decennial Census Data from 1970–1990: Update with 2000 Data

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 24 - Trang 373-378 - 2003
Christopher Garbacz1, Herbert G. Thompson2
1Mississippi Public Utilities Staff, Jackson
2Ohio University, Athens

Tóm tắt

Adding the 2000 decennial census data to our pooled logit model results in much stronger evidence that targeted subsidy programs to add poor households to the network are ineffective and very costly. Untargeted programs are about nine times more expensive than targeted programs. Overall higher penetration rates are fueled by the declining real price of access and rapid income growth in the 1990s. In addition, our estimate of the first integrated access and new services model with 2000 decennial census data suggests that cell phones and Internet are, in part, responsible for the recent surge in penetration, but precise estimates are difficult without price information.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmad, F., M. R. Ward, and G. A. Woroch. 2001. “Are Fixed and Mobile Service Close Substitutes?” Working paper. Cain, P., and J. M. Macdonald. 1991. “Telephone Economics Pricing Structures: The Effects on Universal Service.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 3: 293-308. Crandall, R. W., and L. Waverman. 2000. Who Pays for Universal Service? When Telephone Subsidies Become Transparent. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Duffy-Deno, K. T. 2001. “Demand for Additional Telephone Lines: An Empirical Note.” Information Economics and Policy 13: 283-299. Duffy-Deno, K. T. 2003. “Business Demand for Broadband Access Capacity.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 24(3): 359-372. Eriksson, R. C., D. L. Kaserman, and J. W. Mayo. 1998. “Targeted and Untargeted Subsidy Schemes: Evidence from Postdivestiture Efforts to Promote Universal Telephone Service.” Journal of Law and Economics 41: 477-502. Garbacz, C., and H. G. Thompson, Jr. 1997. “Assessing the Impact of FCC Lifeline and Link-up Programs on Telephone Penetration.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 11(1): 67-78. Garbacz, C., and H. G. Thompson, Jr. 2002. “Estimating Telephone Demand with State Decennial Census Data from 1970–1990.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 21(3): 317-329. Hausman, J. A., J. G. Sidak, and H. J. Singer. 2001. “Residential Demand for Broadband Telecommunications and Consumer Access to Unaffiliated Internet Content Providers.” Yale Journal on Regulation 18: 129-173. Hausman, J., T. Tardiff, and A. Belinfante. 1993. “The Effects of the Breakup of AT&T on Telephone Penetration in the United States.” American Economic Review (American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings) 83: 178-184. Perl, L. J. 1983. Residential Demand for Telephone Service. White Plains: National Economic Research Associates. Riordan, M. H. 2002. “Universal Residential Telephone Service.” In Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, edited by M. Cave, S. Majumdar, and I. Vogelsang. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 423-473. Taylor, L. D. 2002. “Customer Demand Analysis.” In Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, edited by M. Cave, S. Majumdar, and I. Vogelsang. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 97-142.