Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale

European Journal of Pain - Tập 8 Số 4 - Trang 283-291 - 2004
Fausto Salaffi1, A. Stancati1, Carlo Alberto Silvestri1, Alessandro Ciapetti1, Walter Grassi1
1Department of Rheumatology, University of Ancona, Ospedale A. Murri, ASL5, Via dei Colli 52, 60035 Jesi (Ancona), Italy

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectives. To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity that is most closely associated with improvement on the commonly used and validated measure of the patient's global impression of change (PGIC), and to estimate the dependency of the MCID on the baseline pain scores.Methods. This was a prospective cohort study assessing patient's pain intensity by the numerical rating scale (NRS) at baseline and at the 3 month follow‐up, and by a PGIC questionnaire. A one unit difference at the lowest end of the PGIC (“slightly better”) was used to define MCID as it reflects the minimum and lowest degree of improvement that could be detected. In addition we also calculated the NRS changes best associated with “much better” (two units). In order to characterize the association between specific NRS change scores (raw or percent) and clinically important improvement, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method. PGIC was used as an external criterion to distinguish between improved or non‐improved patients.Results. 825 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (233 with osteoarthritis of the knee, 86 with osteoarthritis of the hip, 133 with osteoarthritis of the hand, 290 with rheumatoid arthritis and 83 with ankylosing spondylitis) were followed up. A consistent relationship between the change in NRS and the PGIC was observed. On average, a reduction of one point or a reduction of 15.0% in the NRS represented a MCID for the patient. A NRS change score of −2.0 and a percent change score of −33.0% were best associated with the concept of “much better” improvement. For this reason these values can be considered as appropriate cut‐off points for this measure. The clinically significant changes in pain are non‐uniform along the entire NRS. Patients with a high baseline level of pain on the NRS (score of >7 cm), who experienced either a slight improvement or a higher level of response, had absolute raw and percent changes greater that did patients in the lower cohort (score of less than 4 cm).Conclusions. These results are consistent with the recently published findings generated by different methods and support the use of a “much better” improvement on the pain relief as a clinically important outcome. A further confirmation in other patient populations and different chronic pain syndromes will be needed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/art.1780340502

10.1002/art.1780331101

10.1002/art.1780290816

Angst F, 2002, Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities, J. Rheumatol., 29, 131

10.1002/art.1780310302

NBecker A.B.Thomsen A.K.Olsen PSjögren PBech JEriksenPain epidemiology and health related quality of life in chronic non‐malignant pain patients referred to a Danish multidisciplinary pain center.Pain1997393–400.

Bellamy N, 1992, Osteoarthritis antirheumatic drug trials. III. Setting the delta for clinical trials—results of a consensus development (delphi) exercise, J. Rheumatol., 19, 451

10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x

10.1067/mem.2001.118012

Cavalieri F, 1991, Relationship between physical impairment, psychological variables and pain in rheumatoid disability. An analysis of their relative impact, Clin. Exp. Rheumatol., 9, 47

10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80019-4

Ehrich E.W., 2000, Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Questionnaire and global assessment in patients with osteoarthritis, J. Rheumatol., 27, 2635

10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0

10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9

Ferraz M.B., 1990, Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis, J. Rheumatol., 17, 1022

10.1002/art.1780380802

10.1067/mem.2001.118863

Goldsmith C.H., 1993, Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee, J. Rheumatol., 20, 561

10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5

Hauley J.A., 1983, A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases, Radiology, 148, 839, 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708

10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6

10.1007/BF00562315

10.1002/1529-0131(200007)43:7<1478::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO;2-M

Leardini G, 2002, A multicentric cost‐of‐illness study on rheumatoid arthritis in Italy, Clin. Exp. Rheumatol., 20, 505

Liang H.L., 1995, Evaluating measurement responsiveness, J. Rheumatol., 22, 1191

Macfarlane G.J., 1999, Chronic widespread pain in the community: the influence of psychological symptoms and mental disorders on healthcare seeking behavior, J. Rheumatol., 26, 413

10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3

10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00301-3

Salaffi F, 1991, Analysis of disability in knee osteoarthritis. Relationship with age and psychological variables but not with radiographic score, J. Rheumatol., 18, 1581

10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.720

10.1007/s100670050065

Syrjala K.L., 1987, Cancer pain: Nursing management, 133

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>3.0.CO;2-E

10.1067/mem.2001.119746

10.1136/ard.49.11.916

10.1002/art.1780270401

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

European Journal of Pain

Tập 8 Số 4

283-291

Thông tin tác giả