The geometry of rest–spike bistability
Tóm tắt
Morris–Lecar model is arguably the simplest dynamical model that retains both the slow–fast geometry of excitable phase portraits and the physiological interpretation of a conductance-based model. We augment this model with one slow inward current to capture the additional property of bistability between a resting state and a spiking limit cycle for a range of input current. The resulting dynamical system is a core structure for many dynamical phenomena such as slow spiking and bursting. We show how the proposed model combines physiological interpretation and mathematical tractability and we discuss the benefits of the proposed approach with respect to alternative models in the literature.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952;117(4):500–44.
Morris C, Lecar H. Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. Biophys J. 1981;35(1):193–213.
FitzHugh R. Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane. Biophys J. 1961;1(6):445–66.
Ermentrout GB, Terman DH. Mathematical foundations of neuroscience. New York: Springer; 2010.
Izhikevich EM. Dynamical systems in neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2006.
Franci A, Drion G, Sepulchre R. An organizing center in a planar model of neuronal excitability. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2012;11(4):1698–722.
Franci A, Drion G, Sepulchre R. Robust and tunable bursting requires slow positive feedback. J Neurophysiol. 2018;119(3):1222–34.
Hindmarsh JL, Rose RM. A model of the nerve impulse using two first-order differential equations. Nature. 1982;296(5853):162–4.
Drion G, Franci A, Seutin V, Sepulchre R. A novel phase portrait for neuronal excitability. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e41806.
Franci A, Drion G, Seutin V, Sepulchre R. A balance equation determines a switch in neuronal excitability. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(5):e1003040.
Drion G, O’Leary T, Marder E. Ion channel degeneracy enables robust and tunable neuronal firing rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(38):E5361–E5370.
Fenichel N. Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J Differ Equ. 1979;31(1):53–98.
Szmolyan P, Wechselberger M. Canards in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\). J Differ Equ. 2001;177(2):419–53.
Szmolyan P, Wechselberger M. Relaxation oscillations in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\). J Differ Equ. 2004;200(1):69–104.
Wechselberger M, Mitry J, Canard RJ. Theory and excitability. In: Lecture notes in mathematics. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 89–132.
Szmolyan P. Transversal heteroclinic and homoclinic orbits in singular perturbation problems. J Differ Equ. 1991;92(2):252–81.
Krupa M, Wechselberger M. Local analysis near a folded saddle-node singularity. J Differ Equ. 2010;248(12):2841–88.
Doedel EJ, Fairgrieve TF, Sandstede B, Champneys AR, Kuznetsov YA, Wang X. AUTO-07P: continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations. 2007.
Ribar L, Sepulchre R. Neuromodulation of neuromorphic circuits. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, Regul Pap. 2019;66(8):3028–40.
Rinzel J. Excitation dynamics: insights from simplified membrane models. In: Fed. proc. vol. 44. 1985. p. 2944–6.
Izhikevich EM. Neural excitability, spiking and bursting. Int J Bifurc Chaos. 2000;10(6):1171–266.
Hindmarsh JL, Rose RM. A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations. Proc R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci. 1984;221(1222):87–102.
Golubitsky M, Schaeffer DG. Singularities and groups in bifurcation theory. New York: Springer; 1985.
Franci A, Drion G, Sepulchre R. Modeling the modulation of neuronal bursting: a singularity theory approach. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2014;13(2):798–829.
Zeeman EC. Differential equations for the heartbeat and nerve impulse. In: Dynamical systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1973. p. 683–741.
Loomis LH, Sternberg S. Advanced calculus. Singapore: World Scientific; 2013.