A cross-national comparison of reform curricula in Korea and the US in terms of cognitive complexity: the case of fraction addition and subtraction

Arnold, L., & Son, J. (2011). Opportunities to conceptualize linear relationships in United States mathematics textbooks: Beyond Y = MX + B. In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the North-American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 381–388). Reno, NV: University of Nevada.

Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio and proportion. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296–333). New York: Macmillan.

Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Carroll, W. M., & Isaacs, A. (2003). Achievement of students using the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project’s Everyday Mathematics. In S. L. Senk & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 79–108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159–199.

Jitendra, A. K., Haria, P., Griffin, C. C., Leh, J., Adams, A., & Kaduvettoor, A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 115–127.

Kadijević, Đ. M. (2002). TIMSS 2003 mathematics cognitive domains. Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoška Istraživanja, 34, 96–102.

Kennedy, L. M., & Steve, T. (1997). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Kim, K. M., & Whang, W. H. (2009). The analysis of children’s understanding of addition and subtraction of fractions. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematics Education, Series E: Communications of Mathematics Education, 23(3), 707–734.

Korean Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. (2002). Mathematics 4-1 Teacher’s Manual. Seoul: DaeHan Printing and Publishing Co., Ltd.

Kouba, V., & Franklin, K. (1993). Multiplication and division: sense making and meaning. In R. J. Jensen (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Early childhood mathematics (pp. 103–126). New York: Macmillan.

Li, Y. (2002). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234–241.

Martone, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1332–1361.

Ministry of Education. (1997). The 7th mathematics curriculum. Seoul: Author.

Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development (2007). Amendment of the 7th mathematics curriculum. Seoul: Author (in Korean).

Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (2011). Mathematics curriculum. Seoul: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for kindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Pang, J. (2009). Good mathematics instruction in South Korea. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41, 349–362.

Parke, C. S., & Lane, S. (2008). Examining alignment between state performance assessment and mathematics classroom activities. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(3), 132–147.

Reed, M. K., & Smith, J. P. (2005). Counting the pinecones: children’s addition and subtraction strategies. Montessori Life, 17(2), 26–28.

Roach, A. T., Elliott, S. N., & Webb, N. L. (2005). Alignment of an alternate assessment with state academic standards. The Journal of Special Education, 38(4), 218–231.

Robitaille, D. F., Schmidt, W. H., Raizen, S. A., McKnight, C. C., Britton, E. D., & Nicol, C. (1993). Curriculum framework for mathematics and science (TIMSS Monograph No. 1). Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.

Sanders, N. M. (1966). Classroom questions: What kinds?. New York: Harper & Row.

Saxe, G., Gearhart, M., & Nasir, N. J. (2001). Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: a study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 55–79.

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C., Cogan, L. S., Jakwerth, P. M., & Houang, R. T. (1999). Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at U.S. mathematics and science education. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

Silver, E. A. (2009). Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: what might we learn? ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41, 827–832.

Son, J. (2011). A global look at math instruction. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(6), 360–370.

Son, J., & Crespo, S. (2009). Prospective teachers’ reasoning about students’ non-traditional strategies when dividing fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 236–261.

Son, J., & Senk, S. (2010). How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 117–142.

Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. In J. Remillard, G. Lloyd, & B. Herbel-Eisenmann (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 37–55). New York: Routledge.

Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., & Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 153–171.

Tabachneck, H. J. M., Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of the task demands of early algebra. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 397–402). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ubuz, B., Erbas, A. K., Cetinkaya, B., & Özgeldi, M. (2010). Exploring the quality of the mathematical tasks in the new Turkish elementary school mathematics curriculum guidebook: the case of algebra. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 42, 483–491.

Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2009). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Webb, N. L. (1997). Research monograph No. 6: Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Webb, N. L. (1999). Research monograph No. 18: Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.

Webb, N. L. (2002). An analysis of the alignment between mathematics standards and assessments for three states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Webb, N. M., Herman, J. L., & Webb, N. L. (2007). Alignment of mathematics state-level standards and assessments: the role of reviewer agreement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26, 17–29.

What Works Clearinghouse (2007). Intervention report, Everyday Mathematics. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/intervention_reports/wwc_everyday_math_091410.pdf . Accessed 22 Feb 2012.