Compromised stability of DNA methylation and transposon immobilization in mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes

Genes and Development - Tập 23 Số 8 - Trang 939-950 - 2009
Jon Reinders1, Brande B. H. Wulff2, Marie Mirouze1, Arturo Marí‐Ordóñez2, Mélanie Dapp1, Wilfried Rozhon3, Etienne Bucher1, Grégory Theiler1, Jerzy Paszkowski1
1Department of Plant Biology, University of Geneva, Sciences III, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
2Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), UPV-CSIC, 46022 Valencia, Spain
3Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria

Tóm tắt

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance has been defined by the study of relatively few loci. We examined a population of recombinant inbred lines with epigenetically mosaic chromosomes consisting of wild-type and CG methylation-depleted segments (epiRILs). Surprisingly, transposons that were immobile in the parental lines displayed stochastic movement in 28% of the epiRILs. Although analysis after eight generations of inbreeding, supported by genome-wide DNA methylation profiling, identified recombined parental chromosomal segments, these were interspersed with unexpectedly high frequencies of nonparental methylation polymorphism. Hence, epigenetic inheritance in hybrids derived from parents with divergent epigenomes permits long-lasting epi-allelic interactions that violate Mendelian expectations. Such persistently “unstable” epigenetic states complicate linkage-based epigenomic mapping. Thus, future epigenomic analyses should consider possible genetic instabilities and alternative mapping strategies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.003

10.1038/nrg1601

Chandler,, 2008, Paramutation: Epigenetic instructions passed across generations, Genetics, 178, 1839, 10.1093/genetics/178.4.1839

10.1038/nature06745

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03303.x

Finnegan, E.J. (1996) in Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation, The role of DNA methylation in plant development, ed Russo V. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), pp 127–140.

10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00233-9

10.1371/journal.pgen.1000048

10.1126/science.1076466

10.1038/sj.emboj.7601150

10.1126/science.1077903

10.1038/nrg2467

10.1093/pcp/pcf131

10.1073/pnas.93.22.12406

Kankel,, 2003, Arabidopsis MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants, Genetics, 163, 1109, 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1109

10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00106-4

10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.029

10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10040733.x

10.1038/sj.emboj.7600743

10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.007

10.1093/emboj/19.19.5194

10.1038/35075612

10.1073/pnas.0709632105

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80840-5

10.1371/journal.pone.0000123

10.1016/0022-2836(86)90226-3

10.1101/gr.7073008

10.1038/nrg1834

10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.014

Riddle,, 2002, The control of natural variation in cytosine methylation in Arabidopsis, Genetics, 162, 355, 10.1093/genetics/162.1.355

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02317.x

10.1016/j.ab.2008.01.001

10.1038/ng1138

10.1101/gad.193701

10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00090-0

10.1093/emboj/cdf657

10.1073/pnas.1432939100

10.1126/science.1165313

10.1371/journal.pbio.0050174

10.1016/j.tplants.2006.07.006

10.1023/A:1006479327881

10.1186/1471-2229-8-92

10.1371/journal.pgen.1000056

10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.003

10.1371/journal.pgen.1000032

10.1038/nature07305