Stereochemistry of collagen*

Wiley - Tập 31 Số 1 - Trang 1-16 - 1988
G. N. Ramachandran1
1Mathematical Philosophy Group, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Tóm tắt

This review article, based on a lecture delivered in Madras in 1985, is an account of the author's experience in the working out of the molecular structure and conformation of the collagen triple‐helix over the years 1952–78. It starts with the first proposal of the correct triple‐helix in 1954, but with three residues per turn, which was later refined in 1955 into a coiled‐coil structure with approximately 3.3 residues per turn. The structure readily fitted proline and hydroxyproline residues and required glycine as every third residue in each of the three chains. The controversy regarding the number of hydrogen bonds per tripeptide could not be resolved by X‐ray diffraction or energy minimization, but physicochemical data, obtained in other laboratories during 1961–65, strongly pointed to two hydrogen bonds, as suggested by the author. However, it was felt that the structure with one straight NH … O bond was better. A reconciliation of the two was obtained in Chicago in 1968, by showing that the second hydrogen bond is via a water molecule, which makes it weaker, as found in the physicochemical studies mentioned above. This water molecule was also shown, in 1973, to take part in further cross‐linking hydrogen bonds with the OH group of hydroxyproline, which occurred always in the location previous to glycine, and is at the right distance from the water. Thus, almost all features of the primary structure, X‐ray pattern, optical and hydrodynamic data, and the role of hydroxyproline in stabilising the triple helical structure, have been satisfactorily accounted for. These also lead to a confirmation of Pauling's theory that vitamin C improves immunity to diseases, as explained in the last section.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ramachandran G.N., 1967, Treatise on Collagen, 103

Ramachandran G.N., 1968, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 63, 160

10.1007/978-1-4757-4602-0_2

10.1016/B978-1-4831-6755-8.50009-7

10.1038/174269c0

Ramachandran G.N., 1955, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A, 42, 215, 10.1007/BF03053510

10.1038/176501a0

10.1038/176780a0

10.1107/S0365110X59002547

Ramachandran G.N., 1954, Curr. Sci. (India), 23, 349

10.1038/176593a0

10.1107/S0365110X52001635

10.1038/176915a0

10.1038/1761062a0

10.1038/177710b0

Ramachandran G.N. Sasisekharan V.&Thathachari Y.T.(1962) inCollagen Proceedings of the symposium held in CLRI in November 1960(Ramanathan N. ed.) pp.81–116 New York .

10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80016-8

10.1016/0926-6585(66)90313-X

10.1021/bi00897a030

Englander S.W.&VonHippel P.H.(1962)Abstract 142 American Chemical Society Meeting Atlantic City NJ.

McBride D.W.&Harrington W.F.(1964)Abstract American Chemical Society Meeting San Francisco CA p.358.

10.1016/S0022-2836(64)80234-5

Hippel P.H., 1967, Treatise on Collagen, 253

10.1002/bip.1968.360061109

10.1016/0022-2836(69)90352-0

10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60281-8

Bornstein P., 1979, The Proteins, 412

10.1007/978-1-4757-4602-0_5

10.1016/0005-2795(73)90187-6

10.1007/978-1-4757-4602-0_1

Ramachandran G.N., 1978, Int. J Quantum Chem. Quantum Biol. Symp., 5, 15