A Gendered Critique of Transboundary Water Management

Feminist Review - Tập 103 Số 1 - Trang 99-119 - 2013
Anton Earle, Susan Bazilli

Tóm tắt

The starting point of this paper is that most of the international transboundary water management (TWM) processes taking place globally are driven by ‘the hydraulic mission’ —primarily the construction of mega-infrastructure such as dams and water transfer schemes. The paper argues that such heroic engineering approaches are essentially a masculinised discourse, with its emphasis being on construction, command and control. As a result of this masculinised discourse, the primary actors in TWM processes have been states—represented by technical, economic and political elites operating in what generally gets termed ‘the national interest’. Left out are the local communities relying on the resource directly: the water users; the poor; women; and other important groups. Instruments such as the UN Watercourses Convention of 1997 make an effort to present an attempt at a gender-balanced approach—through asserting the importance of the ‘no-harm rule’ and the ‘equitable share approach’. However, they end up supporting the status quo through the omission of any reference to gender issues. The paper provides an overview of the masculinised discourse on TWM institutions, proposing that this is the case because of the intersection of two masculinised fields—water resource management and the disciplines engaged in the research of transboundary water management, namely, political science and international relations. The paper investigates two southern African examples that illustrate the potential for including a gendered perspective and pro-poor policies that take into account the needs of the water users or ‘stakeholders’. The analysis includes the international and regional legal agreements on transboundary water issues, searching for evidence of a gendered approach. It is concluded that the laws and organisations responsible for transboundary water management currently do not reflect a gendered approach, despite the international recognition given to the necessity of including women in water management structures at all levels.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allan J.A., 2002, The Middle East Mater Question—Hydropolitics and the Global Economy

10.1525/cag.2005.27.2.73

10.1177/0891243205278639

CSD, 1992, Agenda 21

10.1163/157180609X432860

10.1002/9780470935132.ch1

Earle A., 2005, Mater—and the Peaceful Sustainable Development of the SADC Region

Earle A., 2005, A Preliminary Basin Profile of the Orange-Senqu River

10.2307/2059236

GWA, 2003, The Gender and Mater Development Report 2005: Gender Perspectives on Policies in the Mater Sector

GWP-TEC, 2006, Gender Mainstreaming: An Essential Component of Sustainable Mater Management

10.1016/S0065-2113(07)95001-4

Kalpakian J., 2004, Identity, Conflict and Cooperation in International River Systems

Kistin E., 2007, ‘Transboundary cooperation in SADC: from concept to implementation’ Warfsa-Waternet Symposium Proceedings.

10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00422.x

Lowi M.R., 1995, Journal of International Affairs, 49, 123

MagoleI. (2012) ‘Email communication dated 8 January 2012’ SAREP Project Manager.

Malzbender D.B., 2007, The Impact and Implications of the Adoption of the 1997 UN Watercourse Convention for Countries in Southern Africa

McIntyre O., 2010, ‘International water law: concepts, evolution and development’

Mendelsohn J., 2004, Okavango River: The Flow of a Lifeline

Molle F., 2009, Mater Alternatives, 2, 328

NBI, 2011, Component 5 Report: River Basins Organizations Survey

OKACOM, 1994, Agreement Between Angola, Botswana, and Namibia on the Establishment of a Permanent Okavango River Basin Mater Commission (OKACOM)

ORASECOM, 2000, Agreement between the Governments of the Republic of Botswana, the Kingdom of Lesotho, the Republic of Namibia and the Republic of South Africa on the Establishment of the Orange-Senqu River Commission

ORASECOM, 2007, Roadmap Towards Stakeholder Participation

ORASECOM, 2010, The ORASECOM Communications Strategy: 2010–2012

Parpart J., 2004, Gender, Power and Governance in a Globalizing World

Parpart J., 2009, ‘Fine words, failed policies: gender mainstreaming in an insecure and unequal world’

10.1057/9780230355743.0020

Rieu-Clarke A.S., 2007, The Role and Relevance of the UN Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses to the EU and its Member States

Rochette A., 2005, ‘Transcending the conquest of nature and women: a feminist perspective on international environment law’

SADC, 2000, Protocol on Shared Watercourses

Schuermans A.M., 2004, Evaluation of Success and Failure in International Water Management: The case of the Orange-Senqu River

Singh N., 2006, Wagadu, Spring, 94

Tetreault M.A., 2008, Politics and Gender, 4, 144, 10.1017/S1743923X0800007X

Thamae M.L., 2006, On the Wrong Side of Development: Lessons learned from the Lesotho Highlands Mater Project

10.4324/9780203885451

Turton A.R., 2004, IHDP Update, 3, 4

UN, 1997, Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses

UNDP, 2006, Human Development Report 2006. Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Mater Crisis

UNDP-GEF, 2008, Preliminary Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis of the Orange-Senqu River Basin

UNEP, 1992, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development

UNICEF-WHO, 2011, Drinking Mater Equity, Safety and Sustainability: Thematic Report on Drinking Mater 2011

UNWater, 2005, Gender, Mater and Sanitation: A Policy Brief

10.2166/wp.2003.0002

World Water Assessment Programme, 2009, World Mater Development Report 3

WSSCC and WEDC, 2006, For Her Its the Big Issue: Putting Women at the Centre of Mater Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene

WWF-DFID, 2010, International Architecture for Transboundary Mater Resources Management: Policy Analysis and Recommendations

Zeitoun M., 2011, Addressing Power Asymmetry: How Transboundary Mater Management may serve to Reduce Poverty

10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5

Zwarteveen M., 2008, Mater Alternatives, 1, 111

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Feminist Review

Tập 103 Số 1

99-119

Thông tin tác giả