Using comparison of multiple strategies in the mathematics classroom: lessons learned and next steps

Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. (2010). Washington D.C.: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2602_1. Alfieri, L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 87–113. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775712. Australian Education Ministers (2006). Statements of learning for mathematics. Carlton South Victoria. Australia: Curriculum Corporations. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 373–397. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147–1156. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1147. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cho, S., Holyoak, K. J., & Cannon, T. D. (2007). Analogical reasoning in working memory: Resources shared among relational integration, interference resolution, and maintenance. Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1445–1455. doi:10.3758/BF03193614. Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8. Cummins, D. (1992). Role of analogical reasoning in the induction of problem categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1103–1124. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1103. Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22, 206–214. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.001. Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. (1999). Advancing children’s mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 148–170. doi:10.2307/749608. Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. (2015). Student engagement with others’ mathematical ideas: The role of teacher invitation and support moves. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 126–148. doi:10.1086/683174. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In A. Ortony & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393–405. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6. Guo, J., & Pang, M. F. (2011). Learning a mathematical concept from comparing examples: The importance of variation and prior knowledge. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(4), 495–525. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0060-y. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., … Kersting, N. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (NCES 2003-013). US Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Hodds, M., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2014). Self-explanation training improves proof comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 62–101. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0062. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning (Vol. 4th). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. O., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2797–2822. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01889.x. Kullberg, A., Runesson, U., & Marton, F. (2017). What is made possible to learn when using the variation theory of learning in teaching mathematics? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4). doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0858-4 Kultusministerkonferenz. (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik für den Primarbereich [Educational Standards in Mathematics for Primary Schools]. Neuwied, Germany: Luchterhand. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29–63. doi:10.3102/00028312027001029. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6(4), 586–597. doi:10.3758/BF03212967. Lynch, K., & Star, J. R. (2014a). Exploring teachers’ implementation of comparison in Algebra I. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 144–163. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.07.003. Lynch, K., & Star, J. R. (2014b). Views of struggling students on instruction incorporating multiple strategies in algebra I: an exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 6–18. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0006. Morrison, R. G., Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., Chow, T. W., Miller, B. L., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(2), 260–271. doi:10.1162/089892904322984553. Namy, L. L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 5–15. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.5. Newton, K. J., & Star, J. R. (2013). Exploring the Nature and Impact of Model Teaching With Worked Example Pairs. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 2(1), 86–102. doi:10.5951/mathteaceduc.2.1.0086. Newton, K. J., Star, J. R., & Lynch, K. (2010). Understanding the development of flexibility in struggling algebra students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(4), 282–305. doi:10.1080/10986065.2010.482150. Oakes, L. M., & Ribar, R. J. (2005). A Comparison of infants’ categorization in paired and successive presentation familiarization tasks. Infancy, 7(1), 85–98. doi:10.1207/s15327078in0701_7. Oxford English Dictionary. (2016, August 25). Compare [v.2]. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/37441?rskey=moZ2mC&result=3&isAdvanced=false. Richland, L. E., Holyoak, K. J., & Stigler, J. W. (2004). Analogy use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 37–60. doi:10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_2. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249–273. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.02.002. Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189–203. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667065. Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316(5828), 1128–1129. doi:10.1126/science.1142103. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x. Rittle-Johnson, B., Loehr, A. M., & Durkin, K. (2017). Promoting self-explanation to improve mathematics learning: A meta-analysis and instructional design principles. ZDM Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0834-z. Rittle-Johnson, B., Saylor, M., & Swygert, K. E. (2008). Learning from explaining: Does it matter if mom is listening? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(3), 215–224. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.002. Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346–362. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561–574. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.561. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 529–544. doi:10.1037/a0014224. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2011). The power of comparison in learning and instruction: learning outcomes supported by different types of comparisons. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 55, 199. Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 836–852. doi:10.1037/a0016026. Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2012). Developing procedural flexibility: Are novices prepared to learn from comparing procedures? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 436–455. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02037.x. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–522. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4. Siegler, R. S., & Chen, Z. (2008). Differentiation and integration: Guiding principles for analyzing cognitive change. Developmental Science, 11(4), 433–448. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00689.x. Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 287–301. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.009. Singapore Ministry of Education. (2006). Secondary mathematics syllabuses. Curriculum planning and development division. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/maths-secondary.pdf. Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 404–411. Star, J. R., Newton, K., Pollack, C., Kokka, K., Rittle-Johnson, B., & Durkin, K. (2015). Student, teacher, and instructional characteristics related to students’ gains in flexibility. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 198–208. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.001. Star, J. R., Pollack, C., Durkin, K., Rittle-Johnson, B., Lynch, K., Newton, K., & Gogolen, C. (2015). Learning from comparison in algebra. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 41–54. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.005. Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 408–426. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.11.004. Star, J. R., Rittle-Johnson, B., & Durkin, K. (2016). Comparison and explanation of multiple strategies: One example of a small step forward for improving mathematics education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. doi:10.1177/2372732216655543. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press. Treffers, A. (1991). Realistic mathematics education in the Netherlands 1980–1990. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school (pp. 11–20). Utrecht, Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute. Tyminski, A. M., Zambak, V. S., Drake, C., & Land, T. J. (2014). Using representations, decomposition, and approximations of practices to support prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ practice of organizing discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(5), 463–487. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9261-4. VanderStoep, S. W., & Seifert, C. M. (1993). Learning “how” versus learning “when”: Improving transfer of problem-solving principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(1), 93–111. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0301_3. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389. doi:10.2307/749186. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001. Woodward, J., Beckmann, S., Driscoll, M., Franke, M. L., Herzig, P., Jitendra, A. K., … Ogbuehi, P. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide. Washington, D. C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. Ziegler, E., & Stern, E. (2014). Delayed benefits of learning elementary algebraic transformations through contrasted comparisons. Learning and Instruction, 33, 131–146. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.006. Ziegler, E., & Stern, E. (2016). Consistent advantages of contrasted comparisons: Algebra learning under direct instruction. Learning and Instruction, 41, 41–51. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.006.