Conceptions of the Nature of Science and Technology: a Study with Children and Youths in a Non-Formal Science and Technology Education Setting
Tóm tắt
This study investigated some of the aspects that characterise the understanding of the Nature of Science (NOS) and Nature of Technology (NOT) of 20 children and youths from different countries who perform scientific and technological activities in a non-formal teaching and learning setting. Data were collected using a questionnaire and semistructured interviews. A categorical instrument was developed to analyse the participants’ conceptions of the following subjects: (1) the role of the scientist, (2) NOS and (3) NOT. The results suggest that the participants had naïve conceptions of NOS that are marked by empirical and technical-instrumental views. They characterised NOT primarily as an instrumental apparatus, an application of knowledge and something important that is part of their lives. They exhibited a stereotypical understanding of the role of the scientist (development of methods, demonstration of facts, relationship with technological devices, etc.).
Tài liệu tham khảo
AAAS (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2001). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?q=Views+of+nature+of+science+questionnaire%3a+Toward+valid+and+meaningful+assessment+of+learners%27+conceptions+of+nature+of+science&id=ED472901
Acevedo, J. A., Alonso, Á. V., Massero, M. A., & P. Acevedo, R. (2003). Creencias sobre la tecnología y sus relaciones con la ciencia. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 2(3), 353–376. Retrieved from http://reec.uvigo.es/volumenes/volumen2/REEC_2_3_9.pdf
Akerson, V., Buck, G., Donnelly, L., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 537–549. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9312-5.
Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2005). “How should I know what scientists do?—I am just a kid”: fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/BF03174669.
Beauchamp, G. (2011). Interactivity and ICT in the primary school: categories of learner interactions with and without ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 175–190. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2011.588408.
Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352–377. doi:10.1002/sce.10063.
Buldu, M. (2006). Young children’s perceptions of scientists: a preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121–132. doi:10.1080/00131880500498602.
Cachapuz, A., Gil-Pérez, D., Carvalho, A. M. P. de, Praia, J., & Vilches, A. (2011). A necessária renovação do ensino das ciências. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
Chang, C., & Tsai, C. (2005). The interplay between different forms of CAI and students’ preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class. Science Education, 89(5), 707–724. doi:10.1002/sce.20072.
Constantinou, C., Hadjilouca, R., & Papadouris, N. (2010). Students’ epistemological awareness concerning the distinction between science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 143–172. doi:10.1080/09500690903229296.
DiGironimo, N. (2011). What is technology? Investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1337–1352. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.495400.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ferreira Gauchía, C., Gil Pérez, D., & Vilches, A. (2006). Imagen de la tecnología transmitida por los textos de educación tecnológica. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales, 20, 23–46. doi:10.7203/dces..2441 .Retrieved from http://www.oei.es/decada/Imagen.pdf
Ferreira-Gauchía, C., Vilches, A., & Gil Pérez, D. (2012). Concepciones docentes acerca de la naturaleza de la tecnología y de las relaciones Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad y Ambiente en la educación tecnológica. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(2). doi:10.5565/rev/ec/v30n2.557 .Retrieved from http://ensciencias.uab.es/article/view/557/pdf
Gil-Pérez, D., Montoro, I. F., Alís, J. C., Cachapuz, A., & Praia, J. (2005). Para uma imagem não deformada do trabalho científico. Ciência & Educação Bauru, 7(2), 125–153. doi:10.1590/S1516-73132001000200001 .Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ciedu/v7n2/01.pdf
Gil-Pérez, D., Vilches, A., Fernández, I., Cachapuz, A., Praia, J., Valdés, P., & Salinas, J. (2001). Technology as “applied science”: a serious misconception that reinforces distorted and impoverished views of science. Science & Education, 14(3–5), 309–320. doi:10.1007/s11191-004-7935-0 .Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-004-7935-0
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computadores, Ferramentas Cognitivas: desenvolver o pensamento crítico nas escolas (2nd ed.). Porto: Porto Editora.
Karakas, M. (2011). Science instructors’ views of science and nature of science. Qualitative Report, 16(4), 1124–1159 Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-4/karakas.pdf.
Kosminsky, L., & Giordan, M. (2002). Visões de Ciências e sobre cientista entre estudantes do ensino médio. Química Nova na Escola, 15(1), 11–18 Retrieved from http://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc15/v15a03.pdf.
Kruse, J. W., & Wilcox, J. L. (2013). Engaging students with the nature of science and the nature of technology by modeling the work of scientists. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 86(3), 109–115. doi:10.1080/00098655.2013.772888.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290404.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (p. 831–879). Mahwah, N.J: Routledge.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. doi:10.1002/tea.10034.
Lee, S. W., Tsai, C., Wu, Y., Tsai, M., Liu, T., Hwang, F., et al. (2011). Internet-based science learning: a review of journal publications. International Journal of Science Education, 33(14), 1893–1925. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.536998.
Liou, P.-Y. (2015). Developing an instrument for assessing students’ concepts of the nature of technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 162–181. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.996542.
Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (1998). Primary children’s conceptions of science and the scientist: is the impact of a National Curriculum breaking down the stereotype? International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1137–1149. doi:10.1080/0950069980200909.
NRC (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington: DC: National Academy Press Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=4962.
NRC (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington: DC: National Academy Press Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9596.
Park, H., Khan, S., & Petrina, S. (2009). ICT in science education: a quasi-experimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 993–1012. doi:10.1080/09500690701787891.
Pérez Gomez, Á. I. (2012). Educarse en la era digital (1 ed.). Madrid: Ediciones Morata, S.L.
Praia, J., Cachapuz, A., & Gil-Pérez, D. (2002). A hipótese e a experiência científica em educação em ciência: contributos para uma reorientação epistemológica. Ciência & Educação Bauru, 8(2), 253–262. doi:10.1590/S1516-73132002000200009 .Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ciedu/v8n2/09.pdf
Scherz, Z., & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965–985. doi:10.1002/sce.20159.
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Silverman, D. (2010). Qualitative research: theory, method and practice (3nd ed.). London: Sage.
Sousa, A. B. (2009). Investigação em Educação (2nd ed.). Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
Teixeira, E. S., Freire Jr., O., & El-Hani, C. N. (2009). The influence of contextual approach on the conceptions about the nature of science among physics undergraduate students. Ciência & Educação Bauru, 15(3), 529–556. doi:10.1590/S1516-73132009000300006 .Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1516-73132009000300006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
Zhai, J., Jocz, J. A., & Tan, A.-L. (2014). Am I like a scientist?: primary children’s images of doing science in school. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 553–576. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.791958.