Potential Psychosocial and Instructional Consequences of the Common Core State Standards: Implications for Research and Practice

Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 1–74. doi:10.14507/epaa.v10n18.2002. Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2009). The unintended, pernicious consequences of “staying the course” on the United States’ No Child Left Behind Policy. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 4, 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.ijepl.org. Amrein-Beardsley, A., Berliner, D. C., & Rideau, S. (2010). Cheating in the first, second, and third degree: educators’ responses to high-stakes testing. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18, 1–36. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/714. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: a qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306523. Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. F. (2000). What’s at stake in high-stakes testing: teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 384–397. doi:10.1177/0022487100051005006. Bartlett, L. (2004). Expanding teacher work roles: a resource for retention or a recipe for overwork? Journal of Education Policy, 19, 565–582. doi:10.1080/0268093042000269144. Berliner, D. C. (2009). MCLB (Much Curriculum Left Behind): a U.S. calamity in the making. Educational Forum, 73, 284–296. doi:10.1080/00131720903166788. Berninger, V. W., Fayol, M., & Alston-Abel, N. (2011). Academic interventions: what school psychologists need to know for their assessment and problem solving consultation roles. In M. A. Bray & T. J. Kehle (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of school psychology (pp. 553–566). New York: Oxford University Press. Berryhill, J., Linney, J. A., & Fromewick, J. (2009). The effects of education accountability on teachers: are policies too-stress provoking for their own good? International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 4, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.ijepl.org. Betoret, F. D. (2009). Self-efficacy, school resources, job stressors and burnout among Spanish primary and secondary school teacher: a structural equation approach. Educational Psychology, 29, 45–68. doi:10.1080/01443410802459234. Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 231–268. doi:10.3102/00028312042002231. Byrd-Blake, M., Afolayan, M. O., Hunt, J. W., Fabunmi, M., Pryor, B. W., & Leander, R. (2010). Morale of teachers in high poverty schools: a post-NCLB mixed methods analysis. Education and Urban Society, 42, 450–472. doi:10.1177/0013124510362340. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., Vigdor, J. L., & Diaz, R. A. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low-performing schools to attract and retain high-quality teachers? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 251–271. doi:10.1002/pam.20003. Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1189–1204. doi:10.1037/a0029356. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2014). Common core state standards initiative: preparing students for college and career. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/what-parents-should-know/. Connor, M. J. (2003). Pupil stress and standard assessment tests (SATS): an update. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 8, 101–107. doi:10.1080/13632750300507010. Curby, T. W., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Abry, T. (2013). Do emotional support and classroom organization earlier in the year set the stage for higher quality instruction? Journal of School Psychology, 51, 557–569. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.06.001. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1. Darling‐Hammond, L., & Rustique‐Forrester, E. (2005). The consequences of student testing for teaching and teacher quality. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 104, 289–319. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2005.00034.x. DellaMattera, J. (2010). No preschooler left behind: preschool policies in the NCLB world. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 10, 35–49. Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: challenging or reproducing inequality? Teachers College Record, 106, 1145–1176. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00375.x. Donnelly, L. A., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). High school science teachers’ views of standards and accountability. Science Education, 93, 1050–1075. doi:10.1002/sce.20347. Fantuzzo, J., Perlman, S., Sproul, F., Minney, A., Perry, M. A., & Li, F. (2012). Making visible teacher reports of their teaching experiences: the early childhood teacher experiences scale. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 194–205. doi:10.1002/pits.20623. Farber, B. A. (1991). Crisis in education: stress and burnout in the American teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Finnigan, K. S., & Gross, B. (2007). Do accountability policy sanctions influence teacher motivation? Lessons from Chicago’s low-performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 594–629. doi:10.3102/0002831207306767. Fuhrman, S. H. (1999). The new accountability (CPRE Policy Brief No. RB 27). Philadelphia: Consortium on Policy Research in Education. Geist, E., & Baum, A. C. (2005). Yeah, but’s that keep teachers from embracing an active curriculum: overcoming the resistance. Young Children, 60, 28–36. Guarino, C. M., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: a review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 173–208. doi:10.3102/00346543076002173. Hall, K., Collins, J., Benjamin, S., Nind, M., & Sheehy, K. (2004). SATurated models of pupildom: assessment and inclusion/exclusion. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 801–817. doi:10.3102/00346543076002173. Hamilton, L. S., Berends, M., & Stecher, B. M. (2005). Teachers’ responses to standards-based accountability (Rand Working Paper Series). Santa Monica: RAND. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Accountability shovedown: resisting the standards movement in early childhood education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 457–462. doi:10.1177/003172170208300611. Hoffman, J. V., Assaf, L. C., & Paris, S. G. (2001). High-stakes testing in reading: today in Texas, tomorrow? The Reading Teacher, 54, 482–494. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204940. Hursh, D. (2007). Assessing No Child Left Behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 493–518. doi:10.3102/0002831207306764. Jennett, H. K., Harris, S. L., & Mesibov, G. B. (2003). Commitment to philosophy, teacher efficacy, and burnout among teachers of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 583–593. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000005996.19417.57. Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: the science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Science. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004). Voices from the frontlines: teachers’ perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12, 1–34. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n39. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2006). Looking through different lenses: teachers’ and administrators’ views of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 767–771. doi:10.1177/003172170608701012. Jones, G., Jones, B., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impacts of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 199–203. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439620. Klassen, R. M., Usher, E. L., & Bong, M. (2010). Teachers’ collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 464–486. doi:10.1080/00220970903292975. Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth: Heinemann. Koretz, D. M. (2002). Limitations in the use of achievement tests as measures of educators’ productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 752–777. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3069616. Koretz, D., Barron, S., Mitchell, K., & Stecher, B. (1996a). The perceived effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) (MR-792-PCT/FF). Santa Monica: RAND. Koretz, D., Mitchell, K., Barron, S., & Keith, S. (1996b). The perceived effects of the Maryland school performance assessment program (CSE Technical Report No. 409). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California. Lumsden, L. (1998). Teacher morale. Eugene: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. Mackenzie, N. (2007). Teacher morale: more complex than we think? The Australian Educational Researcher, 34, 89–104. doi:10.1007/BF03216852. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual (3rd ed.). Mountain View: Consulting Psychologists Press. McMaster, C. (2012). Ingredients for inclusion: lessons from the literature. Kairaranga, 13, 11–22. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions in school reform. New York: Routledge. Menken, K. (2006). Teaching to the test: how no child left behind impacts language policy, curriculum, and instruction for English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30, 521–546. doi:10.1080/15235882.2006.10162888. Mintrop, H. (2004). Schools on probation: how accountability works (and doesn’t work). New York: Teachers College. Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. L. (2009). Predictable failure of federal sanctions-driven accountability for school improvement and why we may retain it anyway. Educational Researcher, 38, 353–364. doi:10.3102/0013189X09339055. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257. doi:10.3102/01623737026003237. Palmer, D., & Rangel, V. S. (2011). High stakes accountability and policy implementation: teacher decision making in bilingual classrooms in Texas. Educational Policy, 25, 614–647. doi:10.3102/01623737026003237. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: standardized observations can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119. doi:10.3102/0013189X09332374. Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards the new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40, 103–116. doi:10.3102/0013189X11405038. Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2011). Fear appeals in the primary classroom: effects on test anxiety and test grade. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 580–584. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.007. Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2012). Do highly test anxious students respond differentially to fear appeals made prior to a test? Research in Education, 88, 1–10. doi:10.7227/RIE.88.1.1. Putwain, D. W., & Roberts, C. M. (2009). The development of an instrument to measure teachers’ use of fear appeals in the GCSE classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 643–661. doi:10.1348/000709909X426130. Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2010). Teachers’ use of fear appeals in the mathematics classroom: worrying or motivating students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 456–474. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002005. Putwain, D., & Symes, W. (2011). Perceived fear appeals and examination performance: facilitating or debilitating outcomes? Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 227–232. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.022. Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2014). The perceived value of maths and academic self-efficacy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes test as threatening or challenging. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 229–248. Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 121–129. doi:10.3102/10769986029001121. Richards, J. (2012). Teacher stress and coping strategies: a national snapshot. The Educational Forum, 76, 299–316. doi:10.1080/00131725.2012.682837. Roth, G. (2014). Antecedents and outcomes of teachers’ autonomous motivation: a self-determination theory analysis. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: theory and practice (pp. 36–51). New York: Routledge. Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Legislative competence: the motivational impact of high-stakes testing as an educational reform. In C. Dweck & A. Elliot (Eds.), Handbook of competence. New York: Guilford Press. Ryan, R. M., & La Guardia, J. G. (1999). Achievement motivation within a pressured society: intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to learn and the politics of school reform. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 11, 45–85. Stanford, CT: JAI Press. Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., & Goossens, L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 108–120. doi:10.1037/a0025742. Sprinkle, R., Hunt, S., Simonds, C., & Comadena, M. (2006). Fear in the classroom: an examination of teachers’ use of fear appeals and students’ learning outcomes. Communication Education, 55, 389–402. doi:10.1080/03634520600879170. Stenlund, K. V. (1995). Teacher perceptions across cultures: the impact of students on teacher enthusiasm and discouragement in a cross-cultural context. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41, 145–161. Stipek, D. (2006). No child left behind comes to preschool. Elementary School Journal, 106, 455–465. doi:10.1086/505440. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259. Sunderman, G. L. (2001). Accountability mandates and the implementation of Title I schoolwide programs: a comparison of three urban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 503–532. doi:10.1177/00131610121969406. Tadic, M., Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. (2013). Work happiness among teachers: a day reconstruction study on the role of self-concordance. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 735–750. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.07.002. Taylor, I., Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to understanding antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 75–94. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253. Tenenbaum, H. R., & Ruck, M. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 253–273. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253. U.S. Congress (2002). Public Law 107–110. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Department of Education (2009). Race to the Top program: executive summary. Washington, DC: Author. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 519–558. doi:10.3102/0002831207306859. von der Embse, N., Barterian, J., & Segool, N. (2013). Test anxiety interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic review of treatment studies from 2000–2010. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 57–71. doi:10.1002/pits.21660. von der Embse, N., Kilgus, S. P., Bowler, M., Solomon, H., & Curtiss, C. (2014). Initial development and factor structure of the Educator Test Stress Inventory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. doi:10.1177/0734282914548329. Ysseldyke, J., Nelson, J. R., Christenson, S., Johnson, D. R., Dennison, A., Triezenberg, H., Sharpe, M., & Hawes, M. (2004). What we know and need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 75–94. doi:10.1177/001440290407100105.