A comparison of CAT Doppler and oscillometric Memoprint machines for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats

Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery - Tập 7 - Trang 147-152 - 2005
Rosanne E. Jepson1, Vivien Hartley1, Michael Mendl1, Sarah M.E. Caney1, David J. Gould1
1Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK

Tóm tắt

Indirect blood pressure measurements were compared in 28 conscious cats using Doppler and oscillometric blood pressure-measuring devices. Ten cats were used to compare Doppler measurements between two examiners and 18 cats were used to compare Doppler and oscillometric measurements. The Doppler machine obtained systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings in 100% and 51% of attempts, respectively. With the oscillometric machine, systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings were obtained in 52% of the attempts. With the Doppler, measures of mean systolic blood pressure between two examiners were positively correlated, but there was no correlation for diastolic blood pressure measures. When comparing the results obtained by Doppler and oscillometric machines there was no significant difference between mean systolic blood pressure readings, but the oscillometric machine produced significantly higher estimates of diastolic blood pressure. In both cases, the standard deviations for the oscillometric machine were considerably larger than those for the Doppler machine. The first reading of systolic blood pressure obtained with the Doppler machine was an excellent predictor of the mean of five readings, but this was not so for the oscillometric machine. It took less than 5 min to obtain five readings in 37.5% of cases with the Doppler machine but this was true for only 5% of cases with the oscillometric machine. Two cats with ophthalmological lesions consistent with systemic hypertension were identified. In these two patients, systolic blood pressure measurements were between 200 and 225 mmHg when measured by Doppler, and between 140 and 150 mmHg when measured by the oscillometric machine. This suggests that a lower reference range for normal systolic blood pressure values should be used for the oscillometric device.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1939-1676.1999.tb01141.x 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1995.tb03301.x Branson K.R., 1997, Veterinary Anaesthesia, 26, 347 Caulkett N.A., 1998, Veterinary Anaesthesia, 27, 370 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb01328.x Cowgill L.D., 1998, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 212, 521, 10.2460/javma.1998.212.04.521 10.1046/j.1463-5224.2001.00190.x Curtet J.D., 2001, Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde, 143, 241 10.5326/15473317-35-5-411 Grandy J.L., 1992, American Journal of Veterinary Research, 53, 1166 Henik R.A., 1997, Compendium of Continuing Education in Veterinary Practice, 19, 163 10.1053/jfms.2002.0178 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1990.tb03104.x 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1994.tb03202.x 10.2460/javma.2000.217.695 Morgan R.V., 1986, Journal of American Animal Hospital Association, 22, 615 10.2460/javma.2002.221.646 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb03835.x Sparkes A.H., 1999, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 13, 314 Stiles J., 1994, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 30, 564 10.2460/javma.2002.220.1799