Sexual conflict maintains variation at an insecticide resistance locus
Tóm tắt
The maintenance of genetic variation through sexually antagonistic selection is controversial, partly because specific sexually-antagonistic alleles have not been identified. The Drosophila DDT resistance allele (DDT-R) is an exception. This allele increases female fitness, but simultaneously decreases male fitness, and it has been suggested that this sexual antagonism could explain why polymorphism was maintained at the locus prior to DDT use. We tested this possibility using a genetic model and then used evolving fly populations to test model predictions. Theory predicted that sexual antagonism is able to maintain genetic variation at this locus, hence explaining why DDT-R did not fix prior to DDT use despite increasing female fitness, and experimentally evolving fly populations verified theoretical predictions. This demonstrates that sexually antagonistic selection can maintain genetic variation and explains the DDT-R frequencies observed in nature.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Lande R. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution. 1980;34:292–305.
Fisher RA. The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd ed. New York: Dover; 1958.
Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine Publishing; 1972. p. 136–79.
Parker GA. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA, editors. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press; 1979. p. 123–66.
Rice WR. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution. 1984;38:735–42.
Wedell N, Kvarnemo C, Lessells C, Tregenza T. Sexual conflict and life histories. Anim Behav. 2006;71:999–1011.
Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:280–8.
Hosken DJ, Stockley P, Tregenza T, Wedell N. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes. Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:361–78.
Chippindale AK, Gibson JR, Rice WR. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1671–5.
Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature. 2004;429:65–7.
Mokkonen M, Kokko H, Koskela E, Lehtonen J, Mappes T, Henna M, et al. Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus. Science. 2011;334:972–4.
Harano T, Okada K, Nakayama S, Miyatake T, Hosken DJ. Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression. Curr Biol. 2010;20:2036–9.
Rice WR, Chippindale AK. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J Evol Biol. 2001;14:685–93.
Pennell TM, Morrow EH. Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict. Ecol Evol. 2013;3:1819–34.
Kidwell JF, Clegg MT, Stewart FM, Prout T. Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating. Genetics. 1977;85:171–83.
Prout T. How well does opposing selection maintain variation? In: Singh RS, Krimbas CB, editors. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 157–81.
Patten MM, Haig D. Maintenance or loss of genetic variation under sexual and parental antagonism. Evolution. 2009;63:2888–95.
Fry JD. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution. 2010;64:1510–6.
Arnqvist G. Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation. Evolution. 2011;65:2111–6.
Jordan CY, Charlesworth D. The potential for sexually antagonistic polymorphism in different genome regions. Evolution. 2011;66:505–16.
Mullon C, Pomiankowski A, Reuter M. The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. Evolution. 2012;66:3743–53.
Daborn PJ, Yen J, Bogwitz MR, Le Goff G, Feil E, Jeffers S, et al. A single P450 allele associated with insecticide resistance in Drosophila. Science. 2002;297:2253–6.
Smith DT, Hosken DJ, Rostant WG, Yeo M, Griffin RM, Bretman A, et al. DDT resistance, epistasis and male fitness in flies. J Evol Biol. 2011;24:1351–62.
McCart C, Buckling A, Ffrench-Constant RH. DDT resistance in flies carries no cost. Curr Biol. 2005;15:R587–9.
Bridge CB, Brehme KS. The mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institute: Washington; 1944.
Catania F, Kauer MO, Daborn PJ, Yen JL, Ffrench-Constant RH, Schlotterer C. World-wide survey of an Accord insertion and its association with DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:2491–504.
Darmency H, Menchari Y, Le Corre V, Délye C. Fitness cost due to herbicide-resistance may trigger genetic background evolution. Evolution. 2015;69:271–8.
Kikkawa. Genetical studies on the resistance to parathion in Drosophila melanogaster. Annual Report of Scientific Works, Faculty of Science, Osaka University. 1961;9:1–20.
Hallstrom I. Genetic regulation of the cytochrome P-450 system in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Localization of some genes regulating cytochrome P-450 activity. Chem Biol Interact. 1985;56:173–84.
Billeter J, Jagadeesh S, Stepek N, Azanchi R, Levine JD. Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;279:2417–25.
Dean R, Perry JC, Pizzari T, Mank JE, Wigby S. Experimental evolution of a novel sexually antagonistic allele. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002917.
Hosken DJ. Gene duplication might not resolve intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:556–7.
Kokko H, Brooks R. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction. Ann Zool Fennici. 2003;40:207–19.
MATLAB. version 8.1.0.604. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.; 2013.
Daborn P, Boundy S, Yen J, Pittendrigh B, Ffrench-Constant R. DDT resistance in Drosophila correlates with Cyp6g1 over-expression and confers cross-resistance to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid. Mol Genet Genomics. 2001;266:556–63.
Schmidt JM, Good RT, Appleton B, Sherrard J, Raymant GC, Bogwitz MR, et al. Copy number variation and transposable elements feature in recent, ongoing adaptation at the Cyp6g1 locus. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000998.
McCart C. Insecticide resistance in Drosophila melanogaster and Ctenocephalides felis. PhD thesis. Bath UK: University of Bath. 2006.