Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta
Tóm tắt
Recently introduced robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) facilitates endoscopic surgical manipulation and thereby reduces the learning curve for (advanced) laparoscopic surgery. We present our learning curve with RALS for aortobifemoral bypass grafting as a treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Between February 2002 and May 2005, 17 patients were treated in our institution with robot-assisted laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypasses. Dissection was performed laparoscopically and the robot was used to make the aortic anastomosis. Operative time, clamping time, and anastomosis time, as well as blood loss and hospital stay, were used as parameters to evaluate the results and to compare the first eight (group 1) and the last nine patients (group2). Total median operative, clamping, and anastomosis times were 365 min (range: 225–589 min), 86 min (range: 25–205 min), and 41 min (range: 22–110 min), respectively. Total median blood loss was 1,000 ml (range: 100–5,800 ml). Median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 3–57 days). In this series 16/18 anastomoses were completed with the use of the robotic system. Three patients were converted (two in group 1, one in group 2), and one patient died postoperatively (group 1). Median clamping and anastomosis times were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (111 min [range: 85–205 min] versus 57.5 min [range: 25–130 min], p < 0.01 and 74 min [range: 40–110 min] versus 36 min [range: 22–69 min], p < 0.01, respectively) Total operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay showed no significant difference between groups 1 and 2. Robot-assisted aortic anastomosis was shown to have a steep learning curve with considerable reduction of clamping and anastomosis times. However, due to a longer learning curve for laparoscopic dissection of the abdominal aorta, operation times were not significantly shortened. Even with robotic assistance, laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery remains a complex procedure.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahn SS, Hiyama DT, Rudkin GH, Fuchs GJ, Ro KM, Concepcion B (1997) Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass. J Vasc Surg 26:128–132
Alimi YS, De Caridi G, Hartung O, Barthelemy P, Aissi K, Otero A, Amer M. Giorgi R (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted reconstruction to treat severe aortoiliac occlusive disease: early and midterm results. J Vasc Surg 39:777–783
Alimi YS, Hartung O, Orsoni P, Juhan C (2000) Abdominal aortic laparoscopic surgery: retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19:21–26
Barbera L, Mumme A, Metin S, Zumtobel V, Kemen M (1998) Operative results and outcome of twenty-four totally laparoscopic vascular procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 28:136–142
Coggia M, Bourriez A, Javerliat I, Goeau-Brissonniere O (2002) Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass: a new and simplified approach. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24:274–275
Coggia M, Javerliat I, Di Centa I, Alfonsi P, Colacchio G, Kitzis M, Goeau-Brissonniere O (2005) Total laparoscopic versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a case-control study. J Vasc Surg 42:906–910
Coggia M, Javerliat I, Di Centa I, Colacchio G, Leschi JP, Kitzis M, Goeau-Brissonniere OA (2004) Total laparoscopic bypass for aortoiliac occlusive lesions: 93-case experience. J Vasc Surg 40:899–906
Dion YM, Gracia C (2001) Totally laparoscopic aortic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 33:181–185
Dion YM, Griselli F, Douville Y, Langis P (2004) Early and mid-term results of totally laparoscopic surgery for aortoiliac disease: lessons learned. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:328–334
Dion YM, Thaveau F, Fearn SJ (2003) Current modifications to totally laparoscopic “apron technique.” J Vasc Surg 38:403–406
Kolvenbach R, Ceshire N, Pinter L, Da Silva L, Deling O, Kasper AS (2001) Laparoscopy-assisted aneurysm resection as a minimal invasive alternative in patients unsuitable for endovascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 34:216–221
Lin JC, Kolvenbach R, Schwierz E, Wassiljew S (2005) Total laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass as a routine procedure for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vascular 13:80–83
Nio D, Diks J, Linsen MA, Cuesta MA, Gracia C, Rauwerda JA, Wisselink W (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease: early clinical experience.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:586–590
Olinde AJ, McNeil JW, Sam A, Hebert SA, Frusha JD (2005) Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass: a review of 22 cases. J Vasc Surg 42:27–34
Remy P, Deprez AF, D’hont Ch, Lavigne JP, Massin H (2005) Total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:22–72
Ruurda JP, Wisselink W, Cuesta MA, Verhagen HJ en Broeders IAMJ (2004) Robot-assisted versus standard videoscopic aortic replacement. A comparative study in pigs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:501–506
Silva L, Kolvenbach R, Pinter L (2002) The feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic aortic bypass using a low transverse incision. Surg Endosc 16:173–176
Wisselink W, Cuesta MA, Berends FJ, van den Berg FG, Rauwerda JA (2000) Retroperitoneal endoscopic ligation of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries as a treatment of persistent endoleak after endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 31:1240–1244