To what degree do patients actively choose their healthcare provider at the point of referral by their GP? A video observation study

BMC Family Practice - Tập 20 - Trang 1-10 - 2019
Amy J. C. Potappel1, Maartje C. Meijers1, Corelien Kloek1,2, Aafke Victoor1, Janneke Noordman1,3, Tim olde Hartman4, Sandra van Dulmen1,3,5, Judith D. de Jong1,6
1NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
3Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
4Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
5Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
6Maastricht University, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Many countries in Europe have implemented managed competition and patient choice during the last decade. With the introduction of managed competition, health insurers also became an important stakeholder. They purchase services on behalf of their customers and are allowed to contract healthcare providers selectively. It has, therefore, become increasingly important to take one’s insurance into account when choosing a provider. There is little evidence that patients make active choices in the way that policymakers assume they do. This research aims to investigate, firstly, the role of patients in choosing a healthcare provider at the point of referral, then the role of the GP and, finally, the influence of the health insurer/insurance policies within this process. We videotaped a series of everyday consultations between Dutch GPs and their patients during 2015 and 2016. In 117 of these consultations, with 28 GPs, the patient was referred to another healthcare provider. These consultations were coded by three observers using an observation protocol which assessed the role of the patient, GP, and the influence of the health insurer during the referral. Patients were divided into three groups: patients with little or no input, patients with some input, and those with a lot of input. Just over half of the patients (56%) seemed to have some, or a lot of, input into the choice of a healthcare provider at the point of referral by their GP. In addition, in almost half of the consultations (47%), GPs inquired about their patients’ preferences regarding a healthcare provider. Topics regarding the health insurance or insurance policy of a patient were rarely (14%) discussed at the point of referral. Just over half of the patients appear to have some, or a lot of, input into their choice of a healthcare provider at the point of referral by their GP. However, the remainder of the patients had little or no input. If more patient choice continues to be an important aim for policy makers, patients should be encouraged to actively choose the healthcare provider who best fits their needs and preferences.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Laske-Aldershof T, Schut E, Beck K, Greß S, Shmueli A, van de Voorde C. Consumer mobility in social health insurance markets. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3(4):229–41. Saltman RB, Figueras J. Analyzing the evidence on European Health care reforms: experience in western European health care systems suggests lessons for reform in the United States, according to a major international comparison by the World Health Organization. Health Aff (Millwood). 1998;17(2):85–108. van de Ven WP, Beck K, Buchner F, Schokkaert E, Schut FE, Shmueli A, Wasem J. Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in competitive healthcare markets: are they fulfilled in Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland? Health Policy. 2013;109(3):226–45. Van der Kraan WGM, Van der Grinten TED. The development of Demand-driven care as a new governance concept. In: NIG Annual Work Conference 2004. Rotterdam: Erasmus University, Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG); 2004. Thomson S, Busse R, Crivelli L, van de Ven W, van de Voorde C. Statutory health insurance competition in Europe: a four-country comparison. Health Policy. 2013;109(3):209–25. Vrangbaek K, Robertson R, Winblad U, van de Bovenkamp H, Dixon A. Choice policies in northern European health systems. Health Econ Policy Law. 2012;7:47–71. Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Groenewegen P, de Jong J, van Ginneken E. The Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2016;18(2):1–239. Klop K. Marktwerking in de gezondheidszorg. In: Ed J, editor. Markt en weaarden. Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers; 2002. p. 160–82. Reitsma M, Brabers A, Masman W, de Jong J. De kiezende burger. Utrecht: Nivel; 2012. Groenewoud S, Van Exel NJA, Bobinac A, Berg M, Huijsman R, Stolk EA. What influences patients' decisions when choosing a health care provider? Measuring preferences of patients with knee arthrosis, chronic depression, or Alzheimer's disease, using discrete choice experiments. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(6):1941–72. Hibbard JH, Peters E, Health ARP. Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2003;24:413–33. Trisolini MG, Isenberg KL. Public reporting of patients survival (mortality) data on the dialysis facility compare web site. Dial Transplant. 2007;36:486–99. Dealey C. The factors that influence patients’ choice of hospital and treatment. Br J Nurs. 2005;14:576–9. Magee H, Davis LJ, Coulter A. Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice. J R Soc Med. 2003;96:338–42. Merle V, Germain JM, Tavolacci MP, Brocard C, Chefson C, Cyvoct C, Edouard S, Guet L, Martin E, Czernichow P. Influence of infection control report cards on patients’ choice of hospital: pilot survey. J Hosp Infect. 2009;71:263–8. Group; LMPPP. Primary Care in Europe Compared. 1-03-2018 ed. Leyburn: Leyburn Medical Practice Patient Participation Group; 2018. Jones IR, Berney L, Kelly M, Doyal L, Griffiths C, Feder G, Curtis S. Is patient involvement possible when decisions involve scarce resources? A qualitative study of decision-making in primary care. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(1):93–102. Langer A, Schröder-Bäck P, Brink A, Eurich J. The agency problem and medical acting: an example of applying economic theory to medical ethics. Med Health Care Philos. 2009;12(1):99–108. Birk HO, Henriksen LO. Which factors decided general practitioners’ choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1). Winblad U. Do physicians care about patient choice? Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1502–11. Rosen R, Florin D, Hutt R. An anatomy of GP referral decisions. A qualitative study of GPs’ views on their role in supporting patient choice. London: King’s Fund; 2007. Harris KM. How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(2):711–32. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry M, Bennett C, Eden K, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4. Victoor A. (How) do patients choose a healthcare provider? Utrecht: Nivel; 2015. Victoor A, Noordman J, Sonderkamp JA, Delnoij DM, Friele RD, van Dulmen S, Rademakers JJ. Are patients’ preferences regarding the place of treatment heard and addressed at the point of referral: an exploratory study based on observations of GP-patient consultations. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14(1). Houwen J, Lucassen PL, Stappers HW, Assendelft PJ, van Dulmen S. Medically unexplained symptoms: the person, the symptoms and the dialogue. Fam Pract. 2017;34(2):245–51. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;8(3). Dijs-Elsinga J, Otten W, Versluijs MM, Smeets HJ, Kievit J, Vree R, Marang-van de Mheen PJ. Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care. Med Decis Mak. 2010;30(5):544–55. Rademakers J, Nijman J, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD, Hendriks M. The relative effect of health literacy and patient activation on provider choice in the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2014;114(2–3):200–6. Dixon A, Robertson R, Bal R. The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010;5:295–317. Damman OC, Rademakers J. Keuze-informatie in de zorg: een internationale vergelijking van presentatiewijzen op internet. Utrecht: Nivel; 2008. Fotaki M, Roland M, Boyd A, McDonald R, Scheaff R, Smith L. What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:178–84. Braddock CI. Supporting Shared Decision Making When Clinical Evidence Is Low. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(1 Supl). Zorgautoriteit N. Beleidsregel TH/BR-012: Transparantie zorgaanbieders. Utrecht: Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit; 2014. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651–61. Meijers MC, Noordman J, Spreeuwenberg P, van Dulmen S. Shared decision-making in general practice: an observational study comparing 2007 with 2015. Fam Pract. 2019;36(3):357–64. Bes R, Wendel S, de Jong J. Het vertrouwensprobleem van zorgverzekeraars. ESB. 2012;97(4647):676–7. Leu RE, Rutten FF, Brouwer W, Matter P, Rütschi C. The Swiss and Dutch health insurance systems: universal coverage and regulated competitive insurance markets. The Commonwealth Fund. 2009;104(1–40). van der Velden LFJ, Kasteleijn A, Kenens RJ. Cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen. Peiling 2016. Utrecht: Nivel; 2017.