EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy
Tóm tắt
As emphasized in Part 1 of these guidelines, the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is confirmed or refuted using ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy (V/PSCAN) or multidetector computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries (MDCT). To reduce the costs, the risks associated with false-negative and false-positive diagnoses, and unnecessary radiation exposure, preimaging assessment of clinical probability is recommended. Diagnostic accuracy is approximately equal for MDCT and planar V/PSCAN and better for tomography (V/PSPECT). V/PSPECT is feasible in about 99% of patients, while MDCT is often contraindicated. As MDCT is more readily available, access to both techniques is vital for the diagnosis of PE. V/PSPECT gives an effective radiation dose of 1.2–2 mSv. For V/PSPECT, the effective dose is about 35–40% and the absorbed dose to the female breast 4% of the dose from MDCT performed with a dose-saving protocol. V/PSPECT is recommended as a first-line procedure in patients with suspected PE. It is particularly favoured in young patients, especially females, during pregnancy, and for follow-up and research.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bajc M, Neilly B, Miniati M, Schuemichen C, Meignan M, Jonson B. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, Part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 2009. Submitted.
White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107:I4–8. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000078468.11849.66.
Westmark N. On the roentgen diagnosis of lung embolism. Acta Radiol 1938;19:358–72.
Miniati M, Prediletto R, Formichi B, Marini C, Di Ricco G, Tonelli L, et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:864–71.
Miniati M, Monti S, Bottai M. A structured clinical model for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2003;114:173–9. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(02) 01478-X.
Tapson VF. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1037–52. doi:10.1056/NEJMra072753.
The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990;263:2753–9. doi:10.1001/jama.263.
Miniati M, Pistolesi M, Marini C, Di Ricco G, Formichi B, Prediletto R, et al. Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:1387–93.
Roy PM, Colombet I, Durieux P, Chatellier G, Sors H, Meyer G. Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. BMJ 2005;331:259. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7511.259.
Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Hull RD, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2317–27. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052367.
van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006;295:172–9. doi:10.1001/jama.295.2.172.
Labas P, Ohradka B, Vladimir J, Cambal M. The home treatment of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin, forced mobilisation and compression. Int Angiol 2000;19:303–7.
Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Bounameaux H, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:165–71.
Miniati M, Bottai M, Monti S. Comparison of 3 clinical models for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism. Medicine 2005;84:107–14. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000158793.32512.37.
Miniati M, Bottai M, Monti S, Salvadori M, Serasini L, Passera M. Simple and accurate prediction of the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:290–4. doi:10.1164/rccm.200802-207OC.
Miniati M, Monti S, Bauleo C, Scoscia E, Tonelli L, Dainelli A, et al. A diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism based on standardised pretest probability and perfusion lung scanning: a management study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:1450–6. doi:10.1007/s00259-003-1253-7.
Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000;83:416–20.
Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:92–7. doi:10.1001/archinte.161.1.92.
Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Stiell I, Dreyer JF, Barnes D, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:98–107.
Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:589–602.
Tick LW, Nijkeuter M, Kramer MH, Hovens MM, Buller HR, Leebeek FW, et al. High D-dimer levels increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism. J Intern Med 2008;264:195–200. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01972.x.
Goldin Y, Berliner S, Rogowski O, Paslowski O, Serov J, Halpern P, et al. Correlated expression of D-dimer concentrations with thrombotic burden in acute pulmonary embolism. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2008;19:153–8. doi:10.1097/MBC.0b013e3282f544db.
Ljungqvist M, Soderberg M, Moritz P, Ahlgren A, Larfars G. Evaluation of Wells score and repeated D-dimer in diagnosing venous thromboembolism. Eur J Intern Med 2008;19:285–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.08.007.
Wolf SJ, McCubbin TR, Nordenholz KE, Naviaux NW, Haukoos JS. Assessment of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26:181–5. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.026.
Goldhaber SZ, Elliott CG. Acute pulmonary embolism: part I: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Circulation 2003;108:2726–9. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000097829.89204.0C.
Goldhaber SZ, Haire WD, Feldstein ML, Miller M, Toltzis R, Smith JL, et al. Alteplase versus heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: randomised trial assessing right-ventricular function and pulmonary perfusion. Lancet 1993;341:507–11. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93) 90274-K.
British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003;58:470–83. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.6.470.
Barghouth G, Yersin B, Boubaker A, Doenz F, Schnyder P, Delaloye AB. Combination of clinical and V/Q scan assessment for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a 2-year outcome prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:1280–5. doi:10.1007/s002590000284.
Bajc M, Albrechtsson U, Olsson CG, Olsson B, Jonson B. Comparison of ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy and helical CT for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism; strategy using clinical data and ancillary findings. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2002;22:392–7. doi:10.1046/j.1475-097X.2002.00448.x.
Bajc M, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B. Ventilation/perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. J Intern Med 2008;264:379–87. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01980.x.
Leblanc M, Leveillee F, Turcotte E. Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of V/Q SPECT using 99mTc-Technegas. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:667–72. doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e32827a8e99.
Lemb M, Pohlabeln H. Pulmonary thromboembolism: a retrospective study on the examination of 991 patients by ventilation/perfusion SPECT using Technegas. Nucl Med (Stuttg) 2001;40:179–86.
Reinartz P, Schirp U, Zimny M, Sabri O, Nowak B, Schafer W, et al. Optimizing ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy: parting with planar imaging. Nucl Med (Stuttg) 2001;40:38–43.
Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, Nowak B, Mahnken AH, Buell U. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1501–8.
Sostman HD, Miniati M, Gottschalk A, Matta F, Stein PD, Pistolesi M. Sensitivity and specificity of perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography for acute pulmonary embolism in PIOPED II. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1741–8. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.052217.
Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Accuracy or outcome in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2383–5. doi:10.1056/NEJMe068076.
Moores LK, Jackson WL Jr, Shorr AF, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:866–74.
Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest 1995;107:1375–8. doi:10.1378/chest.107.5.1375.
Henry JW, Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Raskob GE. Pulmonary embolism among patients with a nearly normal ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Chest 1996;110:395–8. doi:10.1378/chest.110.2.395.
Hull RD, Raskob GE, Coates G, Panju AA. Clinical validity of a normal perfusion lung scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 1990;97:23–6. doi:10.1378/chest.97.1.23.
van Beek EJ, Kuyer PM, Schenk BE, Brandjes DP, ten Cate JW, Buller HR. A normal perfusion lung scan in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Frequency and clinical validity. Chest 1995;108:170–3. doi:10.1378/chest.108.1.170.
Freeman LM. Don’t bury the V/Q scan: it’s as good as multidetector CT angiograms with a lot less radiation exposure. J Nucl Med 2008;49:5–8. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.048066.
Palmer J, Bitzen U, Jonson B, Bajc M. Comprehensive ventilation/perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1288–94.
Jogi J, Palmer J, Jonson B, Bajc M. Heart failure diagnostics based on ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography pattern and quantitative perfusion gradients. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:666–73. doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e328302cd26.
ICRP. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals, publication 53. Oxford, New York: ICRP; 1988. p. 121.
ICRP. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP 53). Ann ICRP 1998;28:1–126.
Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T, Reiman RE, Goodman PC, Paulson EK, Frush DP, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:871–6. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1915.
Koller CJ, Eatough JP, Bettridge A. Variations in radiation dose between the same model of multislice CT scanner at different hospitals. Br J Radiol 2003;76:798–802. doi:10.1259/bjr/33117342.
Burrage JW, Causer DA. Comparison of scatter doses from a multislice and a single slice CT scanner. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2006;29:257–9.
Huda W, Vance A. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:540–6. doi:10.2214/AJR.06.0101.
Paul JF, Abada HT. Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2028–37. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0584-3.
Valentin J; International Commission on Radiation Protection. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1–79.
Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 2007;245:742–50. doi:10.1148/radiol.2453062046.
Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, Sethi NN. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1228–33. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.0770.
Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Nelson RC, Toncheva G, Nguyen GB, et al. Radiation dose savings for adult pulmonary embolus 64-MDCT using bismuth breast shields, lower peak kilovoltage, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:244–53. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1066.
U-King-Im JM, Freeman SJ, Boylan T, Cheow HK. Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2709–15.
Andreou AK, Curtin JJ, Wilde S, Clark A. Does pregnancy affect vascular enhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography? Eur Radiol 2008;18:2716–22.
Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M. CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2705–8.
Miniati M, Monti S, Bottai M, Scoscia E, Bauleo C, Tonelli L, et al. Survival and restoration of pulmonary perfusion in a long-term follow-up of patients after acute pulmonary embolism. Medicine 2006;85:253–62. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000236952.87590.c8.
Olsson CG, Bitzen U, Olsson B, Magnusson P, Carlsson MS, Jonson B, et al. Outpatient tinzaparin therapy in pulmonary embolism quantified with ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy. Med Sci Monit 2006;12:PI9–13.
Tagil K, Evander E, Wollmer P, Palmer J, Jonson B. Efficient lung scintigraphy. Clin Physiol 2000;20:95–100. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00232.x.