Density effects on environmental variance and expected response to selection in maize (Zea mays L.)

Euphytica - Tập 174 Số 2 - Trang 283-291 - 2010
Ioannis S. Tokatlidis1, V. Haş2, Ioannis Mylonas1, Ioan Haș2, G. Evgenidis3, Vassilios Melidis3, Anna Copandean2, Elissavet Ninou3
1Department of Agricultural Development, Democritus University of Thrace, Orestiada, Greece
2Agricultural Research Station, Turda, Romania
3National Agricultural Research Foundation, Cereal Institute, Thermi, Greece

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abraham EM, Fasoulas AC (2001) Comparative efficiency of three selection methods in Dactylis glomerata L. and Agropyron cristatum L. J Agric Sci 137:173–178

Batzios DP, Roupakias DG, Kechagia U, Galanopoulou-Sendouca S (2001) Comparative efficiency of honeycomb and conventional pedigree methods of selection for yield and fiber quality in cotton (Gossypium spp.). Euphytica 122:203–211

Christakis PA, Fasoulas AC (2002) The effects of the genotype by environmental interaction on the fixation of heterosis in tomato. J Agric Sci 139:55–60

Crecu C, Haş I (2001) Maize hybrids. Edited by Agricultural Research Station, Turda, Tipo. Hiperborea Turda, pp 1–32

Duvick DN (2005) The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron 86:83–145

Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York

Fasoula DA (1990) Correlations between auto-, allo- and nil-competition and their implications in plant breeding. Euphytica 50:57–62

Fasoula VA, Boerma HR (2007) Intra-cultivar variation for seed weight and other agronomic traits within three elite soybean cultivars. Crop Sci 47:367–373

Fasoula DA, Fasoula VA (1997) Competitive ability and plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 14:89–138

Fasoula VA, Fasoula DA (2000) Honeycomb breeding: principles and applications. Plant Breed Rev 18:177–250

Fasoula VA, Fasoula DA (2002) Principles underlying genetic improvement for high and stable crop yield potential. Field Crop Res 75:191–209

Fasoula VA, Tollenaar M (2005) The impact of plant population density on crop yield and response to selection in maize. Maydica 50:39–48

Fasoulas AC, Fasoula VA (1995) Honeycomb selection designs. Plant Breed Rev 13:87–139

Fehr WR (1987) Principles of cultivar development, vol 1. Macmillan, New York

Ipsilantis CG, Vafias BN (2005) Plant density effects on grain yield per plant in maize: breeding implications. Asian J Plant Sci 4:31–39

Janick J (1999) Exploitation of heterosis: uniformity and stability. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 319–333

Kotzamanidis ST, Lithourgidis AS, Roupakias DG (2009) Short communication. Plant density effect on the individual plant to plant yield variability expressed as coefficient of variation in barley. Span J Agric Res 7:607–610

Kyriakou DT, Fasoulas AC (1985) Effects of competition and selection pressure on yield response in winter rye (Secale cereale L.). Euphytica 34:883–895

Liu W, Tollenaar M (2009) Response of yield heterosis to increasing plant density in maize. Crop Sci 49:1807–1816

Maddonni GA, Otegui ME (2006) Intra-specific competition in maize: contribution of extreme plant hierarchies to grain yield, grain yield components and kernel composition. Field Crop Res 97:155–166

Missaoui AM, Fasoula VA, Bouton JH (2005) The effect of low plant density on response to selection for biomass production in switchgrass. Euphytica 142:1–12

Ntanos DA, Roupakias DG (2001) Comparative efficiency of two breeding methods for yield and quality in rice. Crop Sci 41:345–350

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa

Tokatlidis IS (2000) Variation within maize lines and hybrids in the absence of competition and relation between hybrid potential yield per plant with line traits. J Agric Sci 134:391–398

Tokatlidis IS, Koutroubas SD (2004) A review study of the maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications on crop yield stability. Field Crops Res 88:103–114

Tokatlidis IS, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Fasoulas AC, Tsaftaris AS (1998) Improving maize hybrids for potential yield per plant. Maydica 43:123–129

Tokatlidis IS, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Fasoulas AC (2001) The development of density independent maize hybrids. Maydica 46:21–22

Tokatlidis IS, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Tamoutsidis E (2005) Benefits from using maize density-independent hybrids. Maydica 50:9–17

Tokatlidis IS, Xynias IN, Tsialtas JT, Papadopoulos II (2006) Single-plant selection at ultra-low density to improve stability of a bread wheat cultivar. Crop Sci 46:90–97

Tokatlidis IS, Tsikrikoni C, Tsialtas JT, Lithourgidis AS, Bebeli PJ (2008) Variability within cotton cultivars for yield, fibre quality and physiological traits. J Agric Sci 146:483–490

Tollenaar M (1992) Is low plant density a stress in maize? Maydica 37:305–311

Traka-Mavrona E (1996) Effects of competition on phenotypic expression and differentiation of five quality traits of carrot (Daucus carota L.) and their implications in breeding. Sci Hortic 65:335–340

Traka-Mavrona E, Georgakis D, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Pritsa T (2000) An integrated approach of breeding and maintaining an elite cultivar of snap bean. Agron J 92:1020–1026

Yan W, Wallace DH (1995) Breeding for negatively associated traits. Plant Breed Rev 13:41–177