Why change fails: knowledge counts

Emerald - Tập 26 Số 5 - Trang 400-411 - 2005
Marvin Washington1, Marla Hacker2
1Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
2Oregon State University, Cascades, Bend, Oregon, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the relationship between managers' understanding of a specific organizational change process and their attitudes towards implementing the change.Design/methodology/approachAfter a review of the current literature on the link between organizational change, knowledge of the change, and attitudes towards implementing the change, limited research was found that examined the relationship between knowledge of change and resistance to change. Then original empirical research was conducted by administering a survey to 296 managers from the Botswana Government.FindingsThe results of the regression models suggest that managers who understand the change effort are more likely to be less resistant to change. Specifically, the more a manager understood the change, the more likely they were to be excited about the change, the less likely that they would think the change effort would fail, and the less likely they were to state that they wished their organization had never implemented the change.Research limitations/implicationsThe major limitation of our research is that the data are self‐reported. The managers themselves rated their knowledge of the change and their resistance or lack of resistance to the change. However, because the question is one where social desirability bias (a major concern of self‐reported data) would lead to no variance (all managers should have said that they understood the change) and the self‐report bias is minimal. The research implications are that a link between knowledge of the organizational change has been found, and resistance to change, adding to the literature on why individuals resist change.Practical implicationsThe practical implications is that senior managers need to focus more on developing checks to ensure that managers understand the change program and the implications of the change program as a way of ensuring that they, and their subordinates, understand the change program.Originality/valueThe value of the study is that it is one of the first studies to empirically show a link between knowledge of change and resistance to change. The originality of the study is the dataset (managers from the public sector in Botswana) and the application (managers attempting to implement total quality techniques in a large‐scale bureaucracy).

Tài liệu tham khảo

Armenakis, A., Harris, S. and Field, H. (1999), “Paradigms in organizational change: change agent and change target perspectives”, in Golembiewski, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Dekker, New York, NY. Attaran, M. (2000), “Why does re‐engineering fail? A practical guide for successful implementation”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 794‐801. Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (2000), “Cracking the code of change”, Harvard Business Review, May‐June, pp. 133‐41. Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. and Spector, B. (1990), “Why change programs don't produce change”, Harvard Business Review, November‐December, pp. 158‐66. Belsey, A., Kuh, E. and Welsch, R.E. (1980), Regression Diagnostics, Wiley, New York, NY. Burnes, B. and James, H. (1994), “Culture, cognitive dissonance and the management of change”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 14‐33. Cuch, L. and French, J. (1948), “Overcoming resistance to change”, Human Relations, Vol. 1. Hacker, M. and Washington, M. (2003), “Project leadership and organizational change”, Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp. 1‐6. Hacker, M. and Washington, M. (2004), “How we measure the implementation of large‐scale change”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 52‐9. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993), Re‐engineering the Corporation, HarperCollins, New York, NY. Isabella, L. (1990), “Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: how managers construe key organizational events”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 7‐41. Jaffe, D.T., Scott, C.D. and Tobe, G. (1994), Rekindling Commitment, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA. Judson, A.S. (1991), Changing Behavior in Organizations: Minimizing Resistance to Change, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA. Kotter, J. (1995), “Leading change: why transformation efforts fail”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 58‐67, March‐April. Longenecker, C.O. and Fink, L.S. (2001), “Improving management and performance in rapidly changing organizations”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 7‐18. Löwstedt, J. (1993), “Organizing frameworks in emerging organizations: a cognitive approach to the analysis of change”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 501‐26. Miller, V.D., Johnson, J.R. and Grau, J. (1994), “Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 22, pp. 59‐80. Nunnally, J.C. and Berstein, J.H. (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY. Post, J.E. and Altman, B.W. (1994), “Managing the environmental change process: barriers and opportunities”, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 464‐81. Quinn, R. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1983), “A spatial model for effectiveness criteria: toward a competing values approach to organizational analysis”, Management Science, Vol. 29, pp. 363‐77. Quinn, R., Faerman, S., Thompson, M. and McGrath, M. (1996), Becoming a Master Manager: A Competency Framework, Wiley, New York, NY. Weber, M. (1978), in Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Eds), Economy and Society, University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 26 Số 5

400-411

Thông tin tác giả