Diagnosis of Guillain–Barré syndrome in children and validation of the Brighton criteria

Deutsche Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde - Tập 264 - Trang 856-861 - 2017
Joyce Roodbol1,2, Marie-Claire Y. de Wit2, Bianca van den Berg1,3, Vivienne Kahlmann1,2, Judith Drenthen1,4, Coriene E. Catsman-Berrevoets2, Bart C. Jacobs1,5
1Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2Paediatric Neurology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
4Clinical Neurophysiology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
5Immunology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

To describe the key diagnostic features of pediatric Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) and validate the Brighton criteria. Retrospective cohort study of all children (<18 years) diagnosed with GBS between 1987 and 2013 at Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam. Clinical information was collected and the sensitivity of the Brighton criteria was calculated. 67 children (35 boys) were included, with a median age of 5.0 years [interquartile range (IQR) 3.0–10.0 years]. Bilateral limb weakness was present at hospital admission in 93% of children, and at nadir in all patients. Children presented with tetraparesis in 70% or with paraparesis in 23%. Reduced reflexes in paretic limbs were observed at hospital admission in 82% and during follow-up in all children. The progressive phase lasted median 6 days (IQR 3–8 days) and less than 4 weeks in all children. A monophasic disease course was seen in 97%, including 5 children with a treatment-related fluctuation. Two children had a later relapse at 9 weeks and 19 weeks after onset. 77% of the children showed an elevated protein level in CSF. Nerve conduction studies showed evidence for a poly(radiculo)neuropathy in 91% of the children. 46 children had a complete data set, the sensitivity of the Brighton criteria level 1 was 72% (95% CI 57–84) and 96% (95% CI 85–99) for level 2 and 98% (95% CI 88–100) for level 3. The majority of the pediatric GBS patients presented in this cohort fulfilled the current diagnostic criteria.

Tài liệu tham khảo

van den Berg B, Walgaard C, Drenthen J, Fokke C, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA (2014) Guillain-Barre syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Nat Rev Neurol 10:469–482 Asbury AK, Cornblath DR (1990) Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol 27(Suppl):S21–24 Sejvar JJ, Kohl KS, Gidudu J, Amato A, Bakshi N, Baxter R, Burwen DR, Cornblath DR, Cleerbout J, Edwards KM, Heininger U, Hughes R, Khuri-Bulos N, Korinthenberg R, Law BJ, Munro U, Maltezou HC, Nell P, Oleske J, Sparks R, Velentgas P, Vermeer P, Wiznitzer M, Brighton Collaboration GBSWG (2011) Guillain-Barre syndrome and Fisher syndrome: case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine 29:599–612 Choe YJ, Cho H, Bae GR, Lee JK (2011) Guillain-Barre syndrome following receipt of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine in Korea with an emphasis on Brighton Collaboration case definition. Vaccine 29:2066–2070 Fokke C, van den Berg B, Drenthen J, Walgaard C, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC (2014) Diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain 137:33–43 Roodbol J, de Wit MC, Walgaard C, de Hoog M, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Jacobs BC (2011) Recognizing Guillain-Barre syndrome in preschool children. Neurology 76:807–810 Hughes RA, Newsom-Davis JM, Perkin GD, Pierce JM (1978) Controlled trial prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet 2:750–753 Ruts L, Drenthen J, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA, Dutch GBSSG (2010) Distinguishing acute-onset CIDP from fluctuating Guillain-Barre syndrome: a prospective study. Neurology 74:1680–1686 Ruts L, van Koningsveld R, van Doorn PA (2005) Distinguishing acute-onset CIDP from Guillain-Barre syndrome with treatment related fluctuations. Neurology 65:138–140 Hadden RD, Cornblath DR, Hughes RA, Zielasek J, Hartung HP, Toyka KV, Swan AV (1998) Electrophysiological classification of Guillain-Barre syndrome: clinical associations and outcome. Plasma exchange/sandoglobulin guillain-barre syndrome trial group. Ann Neurol 44:780–788 van Koningsveld R, Schmitz PI, Meche FG, Visser LH, Meulstee J, van Doorn PA, Dutch GBS study group (2004) Effect of methylprednisolone when added to standard treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre syndrome: randomised trial. Lancet 363:192–196 Mateen FJ, Cornblath DR, Jafari H, Shinohara RT, Khandit D, Ahuja B, Bahl S, Sutter RW (2011) Guillain-Barre Syndrome in India: population-based validation of the Brighton criteria. Vaccine 29:9697–9701 Smith N, Pereira J, Grattan-Smith P (2014) Investigation of suspected Guillain–Barre syndrome in childhood: what is the role for gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spine? J Paediatr Child Health 50:E72–E76 van den Berg B, Fokke C, Drenthen J, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC (2014) Paraparetic Guillain–Barre syndrome. Neurology 82:1984–1989 Drenthen J, Maathuis EM, Ruts L, van Doorn PA, Blok JH, Visser GH (2008) Serial CMAP scan analysis in Guillain-Barre patients. J Peripher Nerv Syst 13:167 Goedee HS, Brekelmans GJF, van Asseldonk JTH, Beekman R, Mess WH, Visser LH (2013) High resolution sonography in the evaluation of the peripheral nervous system in polyneuropathy - a review of the literature. Eur J Neurol 20(10):1342–1351