What Matters in for the Subjective Well-Being of Children in Care?
Tóm tắt
Children’s subjective well-being (SWB) constitutes an important component in understanding their quality of life. However, little is known about children in public care regarding their perceptions and satisfaction with life. The purpose of this study is to explore differences in SWB between adolescents in residential care, kinship care and family foster care with no relatives. The study used data from care population in Catalonia (Spain) aged 12–14 years (N = 669): 397 adolescents in residential care, 251 adolescents in kinship care and 41 adolescents in non-kinship foster care. The questionnaire of the International Survey of Children’s Well-Being (ISCWeB) was adapted for children in care. It includes a psychometric scale on SWB, the Personal Well-Being Index-School Children (PWI-SC6). Multiple regressions have been used to explore which factors are related to children’s subjective well-being according to type of placement. Findings showed that adolescents living in kinship and non-kinship foster care reported better SWB in all life domains than those in residential care. On one hand, variables as gender and age and on the other hand, the agreement with their placement, satisfaction with the school, with their relationships with friends, and with their use of time and computer, may have an influence on their SWB. These findings highlight the need to address the participation of children any decision that affects their lives, the importance of supporting the education of children in care, and the importance of having friends and of their leisure time. Results are discussed in view of the value of practice and political implications.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Biehal, N., Sinclair, I., & Wade, J. (2015). Reunifying abused or neglected children: decision-making and outcomes. Child Abuse and Neglect. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.014.
Boss, P. (1999). Ambiguous Loss Theory: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burgess, C., Rossvoll, F., Wallace, B., & Daniel, B. (2010). It’s just like another home, just another family, so it’s nae different’ Children’s voices in kinship care: a research study about the experience of children in kinship care in Scotland. Child Family Social Work, 15(3), 297–306.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Canali, C., & Vecciato, T. (Eds.). (2013). Foster care in Europe. What do we know about outcomes and evidences? Padova: Fondazione E. Zancan.
Carbone, J., Sawyer, M., Searle, A., & Robinson, P. (2007). The health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in home-based foster care. Quality of Life Research, 16(7), 1157–1166.
Casas, F. (2011). Subjective social indicators and child and adolescents wellbeing. Child Indicators Research, 4(4), 555–575.
Casas, F., & Bello, A. (2012). Calidad de vida y bienestar infantil subjetivo en España. Madrid: UNICEF.
Casas, F., Sarriera, J. C., Abs, D., Coenders, G., Alfaro, J., Saforcada, E., & Tonon, G. (2012). Subjective indicators of personal well-being among adolescents. Performance and results for different scales in Latin-language speaking countries: A contribution to the international debate. Child Indicators Research, 5(1), 1–28.
Casas, F., Baltatescu, S., Bertrán, I., González, M., & Hatos, A. (2013). School satisfaction among adolescents: Testing different indicators for its measurement and its relationship with overall life satisfaction and subjective well-being in Romania and Spain. Social Indicators Research, 111, 665–681.
Chaves, C., Lima, F., Mendonça, L., Custódio, I., & Matias, E. (2013). Avaliação do crescimento e desenvolvimento de crianças institucionalizadas. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 66(5), 668–674.
Cummins, R A., & Lau, A. (2005). Manual: personal wellbeing index - school children. Third edition. Resource document. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. Retrieved on December 1, 2012 from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/auwbi/index-translations/wbi-school-english.pdf
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Van Pallant, J., Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian Unity Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.
Del Valle, J. F., López, M., Montserrat, C., & Bravo, A. (2009). Twenty years of foster care in Spain. Profiles, patterns and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(8), 847–853.
Departament de Benestar Social i Família. (2013). Memòria del Departament de Benestar Social i Família. Generalitat de Catalunya. http://benestar.gencat.cat/web/.content/01departament/07memories/2013/memoria_2013.pdf
Departament de Benestar Social i Família. (2014). Infografia de Maltractament infantil. Generalitat de Catalunya. http://benestar.gencat.cat/ca/ambits_tematics/infancia_i_adolescencia/dades-de-maltractament-infantil/
Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597.
Dinisman, T., Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2012). The subjective well-being of Spanish adolescents: Variations according to different living arrangements. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2374–2380.
Farmer, E., & Moyers, S. (2008). Kinship Care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Fernández-Daza, M. P., & Fernández-Parra, A. (2013). Problemas de comportamiento y competencias psicosociales en niños y adolescentes institucionalizados. Universitas Psychologica, 12(3), 797–810.
Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (2009). Relations among well-being, avoidant coping, and active coping in a large simple of Australian adolescents. Psychological Reports, 104, 745–758.
Gilbert, R., Widom, C. S., Brown, K., Fergusson, D., Webb, E., & Janson, S. (2009). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. The Lancet, 373, 68–81.
Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: the role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164–175.
Henin, J. (2013). A sense of belonging in a changeable everyday life – a follow-up study of young people in kinship, network, and traditional foster families. Child and Family Social Work, 19(2), 165–173.
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (Eds.). (2014). Improving access to further and higher education for young people in public care. European policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Llosada-Gistau, J., Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2015). The subjective well-being of adolescents in residential care compared to that of the general population. Children and Youth Services Review, 52, 150–157.
López, M., & Del Valle, J. F. (2015). The waiting children: pathways (and future) of children in long-term residential care. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 457–473.
Martín, E., Muñoz, C., Rodríguez, T., & Pérez, Y. (2008). De la residencia a la escuela: la integración social de los menores en acogimiento residencial con el grupo de iguales en el contexto escolar. Psicothema, 20(3), 376–382.
Montserrat, C. (2012). Kinship care, messages from research. Child & Family Social Work, 19(3), 367–376.
Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2007). Kinship foster care from the perspective of quality of life: Research on the satisfaction of the stakeholders. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 227–237.
Montserrat, C., Casas, F., & Bertran, I. (2013a). Desigualdad de oportunidades educativas entre los adolescentes en acogimiento residencial y familias. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36(4), 443–453.
Montserrat, C., Casas, F., & Malo, S. (2013b). Delayed educational pathways and risk of social exclusion: The case of young people from public care in Spain. European Journal of Social Work, 16(1), 6–21.
Montserrat, C., Casas, F. & Baena, M. (2015). La educación de niños, niñas y adolescentes en el sistema de protección ¿Un problema o una oportunidad? (p. 206). Girona: Documenta Universitaria.
Rees, G., Pople, L., & Goswami, H. (2011). Links between family economic factors and children’s subjective well-being: Initial findings from wave 2 and wave 3 quarterly surveys. London: The Children’s Society.
Schütz, F., Sarriera, J., Bedin, L., & Montserrat, C. (2015). Subjective well-being of children in residential care: Comparison between children in institutional care and children living with their families. Psicoperspectivas, 14(1), 19–30.
Tomyn, A. J. (2013). Youth connections subjective well-being report. Part A: Report 4.0.. Australia: RMIT University.
Viñas, F., González, M., García, Y., Malo, S., & Casas, F. (2015). Los estilos y estrategias de afrontamiento y su relación con el bienestar personal en una muestra de adolescentes. Anales de Psicología, 31(1), 226–233.
Wade, J., Biehal, N., Farrelly, N., & Sinclair, I. (2011). Caring for abused and neglected children. Making the right decisions for reunification or long-term care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.