Smart home for elderly care: development and challenges in China

BMC Geriatrics - 2020
Quan Zhang1, Meiyu Li2, Yuzhang Wu3
1Ocean University of China, 238 Songling Road, Qingdao, 266100, PR China
2China University of Petroleum (East China), 66 Changjiangxi Road, Qingdao, 266580, PR China
3School of Translation Studies/Center for Medical Humanities in the Developing World, Qufu Normal University, No. 80, Yantai Road, Donggang District, Rizhao, 287600, Shandong, PR China

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background China’s smart home for elderly care emerged in 2008, and had went through four developmental stages which consists of seed stage, start-up stage, development stage and popularization stage. Main text The status quo and development of smart home for elderly care in China is reviewed, and suggestions are provided on how to further develop China’s smart home for elderly care. The focus of China’s policies on smart home for elderly care were different during those four developmental stages. Compared with Western countries, China’s smart home for elderly care is a policy-driven product rather than technology-driven or demand-driven one. In addition, it is quasi-public goods rather than private goods. These unique characteristics of China’s smart home for elderly care not only become the driving force of its rapid development, but also bring many challenges to its development, such as the insufficient demand, the disorderly development, and the waste of public and private resources. Conclusions Although great progress has been made in China’s smart home care, much efforts are still needed to further advance its development. The technical standards for the elderly care services should be formulated as soon as possible and the existing public and private smart home for elderly care platforms should be combined. Enterprises involved in smart home care services should be encouraged to develop new technologies to reduce the cost of products and services provided by smart home for elderly care.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Chomik R, Piggott J. Population ageing and social security in Asia. Asian Economic Policy Review. 2015;10(2):199–222.

European Commission. The 2012 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010–2060). Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=178782C46AA694FC8121D42A3197E78A?doi=10.1.1.397.2801&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed 27 Apr 2020].

Sparrow R, Sparrow L. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds & Machines. 2006;16(2):141–61.

Beard J. Innovative approaches to dealing with population ageing. Gerontechnology. 2010;9(2):64.

Shinkle D, Tassin L. Aging in place: a state survey of livability policies and practices. Saturday Evening Post. 2011;2(3):17–26.

Peine A, Rollwagen I, Neven L. The rise of the “innosumer”- rethinking older technology users. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2014;82(1):199–214.

Harper R. Inside the smart home. London: Springer; 2003.

Silva L, Morikawa C, Petra I. State of the art of smart homes. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2012;25(7):1313–21.

Junestrand S, Tollmar K. Video mediated communication for domestic environments - architectural and technological design. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 1999;167(8):177–90.

Alaa M, Zaidan A, Zaidan B, et al. A review of smart home applications based on internet of things. Journal of Network & Computer Applications. 2017;97(8):48–65.

Demiris G, Rantz M, Aud M, et al. Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine. 2004;29(2):87–94.

Åkerlind C, Martin L, Gustafsson C. Care managers’ perceptions of e-homecare: a qualitative interview study. Eur J Soc Work. 2019;22(4):634–46.

Sabina M, Sabina M. AAL: ambient assisted living assistive technologies for healthy ageing and opportunities for medicine and caring. Therapeutische Umschau Revue thérapeutique. 2015;72(9):561–5.

State Council Information Office of People’s republic of China. Available at: http://www.scio.gov.cn/32344/32345/33969/34729/xgzc34735/Document/1481612/1481612.htm [Accessed 25 Apr 2020].

Xi H, Ren X, Zhai S. Smart homecare: the elderly care service innovation with information technology. Scientific Research on Aging. 2014;2(7):13–22.

Wang Z. National policies and measures to promote smart home for elderly care. China Social Work. 2017;6(17):30.

Li S. Shanghai has explored and taken measures to build the smart home for elderly care service system under the background of “internet plus” plan. Hum Resour Manag. 2016;9(11):245–6.

Donald M, Judy W. The social shaping of technology – 2ed edition. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.

Cheek P, Nikpour L, Nowlin HD. Aging well with smart technology. Nurs Adm Q. 2005;29(4):329–38.

Geng Y, Wang H. Research on the development of internet plus service for the aged: transformation, integration and new commercial activities. Journal of Tianjin University of Administration. 2017;18(4):36–41.

Lee C. Adoption of smart technology among older adults: challenges and issues. Public Policy & Aging Report. 2013;24(1):14–7.

Murata A, Iwase H. Usability of touch-panel interfaces for older adults. Hum Factors. 2005;47(4):767–76.

Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create). Psychol Aging. 2006;21(2):333–52.

Walsh K, Callan A. Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: a case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing Int. 2011;36(1):102–22.

Gao L, Liu D, Song S, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of community elderly’s demand on smart home care. Health Vocational Education. 2019;25(12):123–5.

Mao Y, Li D. A study on factors influencing the use behavior of smart home for elderly care based on UTAUT model: a case study of Wuhan. E-government. 2015;155(11):107–14.

Xu X. Resource shortage or resource dependence: resource dilemma of elderly care service in smart community. Lanzhou Academic J. 2019;39(5):196–208.

Guo J. International comparison and reference on home pension service mode. Social Security Res. 2010;3(1):29–39.

Jiang C. Smart endowment ecological chain construction under new normal: based on supply and demand perspective. J Shandong Univ Finance Econ. 2016;22(6):104–13.

Zhang Q, Li L, Ji G. Challenges and solutions to the coordinated development of smart home for elderly care in Qingdao. In: Outstanding research compilation of human resources and social security department of Shandong province, China; 2018.

Geng Y, Wang X. The internet plus service for the elderly: opportunities, predicaments and solutions. J Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition). 2017;33(4):109–14.

Mynatt ED, Rogers WA. Developing technology to support the functional independence of older adults. Ageing Int. 2001;27(1):24–41.

Zhang C, Li J. Research on the current development and standardization of smart homecare home and abroad. China Standardization. 2018;24(20):201–3.

Neven L. 'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol Health Ill. 2010;32(2):335–47.

Cotten S, Ford G, Ford S, et al. Internet use and depression among older adults. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(2):496–9.

Siegel C, Hochgatterer A, Dorner TE. Contributions of ambient assisted living for health and quality of life in the elderly and care services-a qualitative analysis from the experts’ perspective of care service professionals. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14(1):112.

Peine A. Understanding the dynamics of technological configurations: a conceptual framework and the case of smart homes. Technol Forecasting Soc Change. 2009;76(3):396–409.

Zhang Q, Li H. From possibility to feasibility: international research progress of smart home for the elderly people and enlightenment for China. Learning and Practice. 2019;25(2):109–18.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

BMC Geriatrics

Thông tin tác giả