The messy history of OB&D: how three strands came to be seen as one rope

Emerald - Tập 40 Số 3 - Trang 266-280 - 2002
Eric B. Dent1
1University of Maryland University College, Adelphi, Maryland, USA

Tóm tắt

The George Washington University organizational behavior students have been privileged to learn from professors who were students of three different founders of the field. The three strands discussed here are Roethlisberger and the Harvard Business School, Kurt Lewin and NTL, and Herzberg. This learning experience is very different from introductory textbooks, which give the impression that the field has made consistent, linear progress from the early days until today. The enriched experience includes a sense of the false starts, values conflicts, egos, lack of cross‐communication, and other dimensions of the human condition that played a role in the founding of OB&D. This article reviews the development of these strands and points out that, although there are similarities, they were working on different problems, using different data sources, with different units of analysis. The article concludes with a glimpse at how these three founders would view the field of OB&D today.


Tài liệu tham khảo

Argyris, C. (1957), Personality and Organization: The Conflict between the System and the Individual, Harper & Row, New York, NY. Bradford, L.P. (1974), National Training Laboratories – Its History: 1947‐1970, NTL Institute, Bethel, ME. Cummings, T.G. and Worley, C.G. (1997), Organization Development and Change, 6th ed., South‐Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH. Dent, E.B. (1993), Organization Development, University of Maryland Press, College Park, MD. Dent, E.B. (forthcoming), “The changes in individual world‐view needed for organizational success”, Emergence: A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management. Harvey, J.B. (1997a), class lecture, January 31. Harvey, J.B. (1997b), author interview, April 14. Herzberg, F. (1984), “Mystery systems shape loyalties”, Industry Week, Vol. 223 No. 4, pp. 101‐4. Herzberg, F. (1987), “One more time: how do you motivate employees?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 109‐20. Herzberg, F. (in process), “Happiness and unhappiness: a brief autobiography”, unpublished manuscript. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. and Snyderman, B. (1959), The Motivation to Work, Wiley, New York, NY. Hirsch, J.I. (1986), A History of the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, 1947‐1986, EdD dissertation, Boston University School of Education, Boston, MA. Kleiner, A. (1996), The Age of Heretics: Heroes, Outlaws, and the Forerunners of Corporate Change, Currency Doubleday, New York, NY. Kuhn, T.S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Likert, R. (1961), New Patterns of Management, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY. Lippitt, G.L. and Seashore, E. (1962), The Leader and Group Effectiveness, Association Press, New York, NY. McGregor, D. (1960), The Human Side of Enterprise, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY. Marrow, A. (1969), The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin, Basic Books, New York, NY. Roethlisberger, F.J. (1977), in Lombard, G. (Ed.), The Elusive Phenomena: An Autobiographical Account of My Work in the Field of Organizational Behavior at the Harvard Business School, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Vaill, P.B. (1997a), class lectures, March 7 and 14. Vaill, P.B. (1997b), author interview, April 10. Winslow, E.K. (1997a), class lecture, February 7. Winslow, E.K. (1997b), author interview, May 5. Herzberg, F. (1966), Work and the Nature of Man, Thomas Y. Crowell, New York, NY. Herzberg, F. (1976), The Managerial Choice: To Be Efficient and to Be Human, Dow Jones‐Irwin, Homewood, IL. Roethlisberger, F.J. (1964), “The contributions of the behavioral sciences to a general theory of management”, in Koontz, H. (Ed.), Toward a Unified Theory of Management, McGraw‐Hill. New York, NY, pp. 41‐67.