Hierarchical model-based inference for forest inventory utilizing three sources of information

Annals of Forest Science - Tập 73 - Trang 895-910 - 2016
Svetlana Saarela1, Sören Holm1, Anton Grafström1, Sebastian Schnell1, Erik Næsset2, Timothy G. Gregoire3, Ross F. Nelson4, Göran Ståhl1
1Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
2Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management; Norwegian University of Life Sciences; Ås Norway
3School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, USA
4NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA

Tóm tắt

The study presents novel model-based estimators for growing stock volume and its uncertainty estimation, combining a sparse sample of field plots, a sample of laser data, and wall-to-wall Landsat data. On the basis of our detailed simulation, we show that when the uncertainty of estimating mean growing stock volume on the basis of an intermediate ALS model is not accounted for, the estimated variance of the estimator can be biased by as much as a factor of three or more, depending on the sample size at the various stages of the design. This study concerns model-based inference for estimating growing stock volume in large-area forest inventories, combining wall-to-wall Landsat data, a sample of laser data, and a sparse subsample of field data. We develop and evaluate novel estimators and variance estimators for the population mean volume, taking into account the uncertainty in two model steps. Estimators and variance estimators were derived for two main methodological approaches and evaluated through Monte Carlo simulation. The first approach is known as two-stage least squares regression, where Landsat data were used to predict laser predictor variables, thus emulating the use of wall-to-wall laser data. In the second approach laser data were used to predict field-recorded volumes, which were subsequently used as response variables in modeling the relationship between Landsat and field data. ∙ The estimators and variance estimators are shown to be at least approximately unbiased. Under certain assumptions the two methods provide identical results with regard to estimators and similar results with regard to estimated variances. We show that ignoring the uncertainty due to one of the models leads to substantial underestimation of the variance, when two models are involved in the estimation procedure.

Tài liệu tham khảo