Social responsibilities of MNCs in downsizing operations

Emerald - Tập 23 Số 2 - Trang 149-174 - 2010
Hannele Mäkelä1, Salme Näsi1
1Department of Economics and Accounting, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper aims to contribute to the understanding of the social aspects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) by studying a case of organizational downsizing.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses a theoretical framework consisting of stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory together with the concept of social contract. Textual analysis methods are used to analyse and interpret the empirical data, which consist of mass media articles.FindingsThe main finding is that key stakeholders, especially employees and their representatives and the multinational corporation (MNC) itself perceive social aspects of CSR differently. The economic dimension dominates the social aspect in the corporate representatives' argumentation. Accounting information is used as a rhetorical tool to legitimise the downsizing actions rather than for purposes of accountability and transparent informative content.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is based on a detailed analysis of a specific context. This may limit the wider applicability of the findings. Even so, it adds insights to the academic literature on the varying conceptions of the social responsibilities of corporations, perceived not only by the firm itself, but also by different stakeholders.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature on CSR by investigating understandings of corporate social responsibility in a case where the economic and social responsibilities of a firm are publicly debated. The study also links the theoretical debate on corporate social responsibility to a context with a complex range of political and social factors affecting the construction of the social and economic responsibilities of a firm.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, C.A. (2002), “Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 223‐50. Ader, C.R. (1995), “A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 300‐11. Antal, A.B., Dierkes, M., MacMillan, K. and Marz, L. (2002), “Corporate social reporting revisited”, Journal of General Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, Winter. Bailey, D., Harte, G. and Sugden, R. (2000), “Corporate disclosure and the deregulation of international investment”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 197‐218. Barsky, N.P., Hussein, M.E. and Jablonsky, S.F. (1999), “Shareholder and stakeholder value in corporate downsizing. The case of United Technologies Corporation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 583‐604. Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C. and Moneva, J.M. (2008), “Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 337‐61. Benson, J.K. (1975), “The interorganizational network as a political economy”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 20, pp. 229‐49. Boyce, G. (2000), “Public discourse and decision making: exploring possibilities for financial, social and environmental accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 27‐64. Boyce, G. (2008), “The social relevance of ethics education in a global(ising) era: from individual dilemmas to systemic crises”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 19, pp. 255‐90. Brown, N. and Deegan, C. (1998), “The public disclosure of environmental performance information – a dual test of media agenda‐setting theory and legitimacy theory”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 21‐41. Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007), Business Research Methods, 2nd ed., Online Resource Centre, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Buhr, N. (2002), “A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 17‐38. Craig, R. and Amernic, J. (2004a), “Enron discourse: the rhetoric of a resilient capitalism”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15, pp. 813‐51. Craig, R. and Amernic, J. (2004b), “The deployment of accounting‐related rhetoric in the prelude to a privatization”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 41‐58. Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2004), Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Deegan, C. (2002), “The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 282‐311. Deegan, C., Rankin, M. and Tobin, J. (2002), “An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: a test of legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 312‐43. Deegan, C., Rankin, M. and Voght, P. (2000), “Firms' disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 101‐30. Finnish Forest Industries Federation (2009), available at: www.forestindustries.fi (accessed 2 February 2007, 30 August 2008 and 8 August 2009). Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Brookline, MA. Gray, R. (2002), “The social accounting project and accounting, organizations and society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?”, Accounting, Organisations & Society, Vol. 27, pp. 687‐708. Gray, R. (2001), “Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt?”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 10 No. 1. Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995), “Corporate social and environmental reporting. A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 47‐77. Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. (1996), Accounting & Accountability. Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting, Prentice‐Hall, Harlow. Harte, G.F. and Owen, D.L. (1987), “Fighting de‐industrialisation: the role of local government social audits”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 123‐41. Jokinen, A., Juhila, K. and Suoninen, E. (1999), Diskurssianalyysi liikkeessä, Vastapaino, Tampere. Kakkuri‐Knuuttila, M‐L. (1998), Argumentti ja kritiikki – Lukemisen, keskustelun ja vakuuttamisen taidot, Gaudeamus, Helsinki. Kakkuri‐Knuuttila, M‐L. and Heinilahti, K. (2006), Mitä on tutkimus? Argumentaatio ja tieteenfilosofia, Gaudeamus, Helsinki. Laine, M. (2005), “Meanings of the term ‘sustainable development’ in Finnish corporate disclosures”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 395‐413. Larrinaga‐Gonzalez, C. and Bebbington, J. (2001), “Accounting change or institutional appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 269‐92. Lehman, G. (1999), “Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 217‐41. Lindblom, C.K. (1993), “The implications of organisational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure”, paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY. McCombs, M. and Shaw, D. (1972), “The agenda‐setting function of the mass media”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 176‐87. Mathews, M.R. (1993), Socially Responsible Accounting, Chapman & Hall, London. Mathews, M.R. (1997), “Twenty‐five years of social and environmental accounting research: is there a silver jubilee to celebrate?”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 481‐531. Mathews, M.R. (2000), “Accounting for macro‐social impacts: a new research agenda”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 187‐96. Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008), “‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 404‐24. Miller, P. (1994), “Accounting as social and institutional practice: an introduction”, in Hopwood, A. and Miller, P. (Eds), Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Mouck, T. (1995), “Financial reporting, democracy and environmentalism: a critique of the commodification of information”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 6 No. 6, pp. 535‐53. Näsi, J. (1979), Yrityksen suunnittelun perusteet, Tampereen yliopisto, Tampere. Näsi, J. (1995), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, LSR‐Julkaisut Oy, Helsinki. O'Donovan, G. (1999), “Managing legitimacy through increased corporate environmental reporting: an exploratory study”, Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 63‐99. O'Dwyer, B. (2003), “Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the nature of managerial capture”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 523‐57. Owen, D. (2008), “Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 240‐67. Parker, L. (2005), “Social and environmental accountability research: a view from the commentary box”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 842‐60. Peltola, A. (2005), Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki. Perelman, C. (1982), The Realm of Rhetoric, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009), available at: www.pwc.com (accessed 8 September 2009). Scholte, J.A. (2000), Globalization: A Critical Introduction, Palgrave, Basingstoke. Shocker, A.D. and Sethi, S.P. (1973), “An approach to incorporating societal preferences in developing corporate social action”, California Management Review, Summer, pp. 97‐105. Smith, K. (1987), “Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues: a time‐series analysis”, Journalism Monographs, No. 101. Statistics Finland (2008), Statistics Finland Web Site, available at: www.stat.fi/index_en.html. Tinker, T. and Carter, C. (2003), “Spectres of accounting: contradictions or conflicts of interests?”, Organization, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 577‐82. Tregidga, H. and Milne, M. (2006), “From sustainable management to sustainable development: a longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 219‐41. Unerman, J. and Bennet, M. (2004), “Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 685‐707. Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O'Dwyer, B. (2007), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, Oxford. UPM‐Kymmene Corporation (2005‐2007), Annual Reports 2005‐2007, available at: www.upm‐kymmene.com. Woodward, D., Edwards, P. and Birkin, F. (2001), “Some evidence on executives' views of corporate social responsibility”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 357‐97.