Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander R., 2005, Towards dialogic teaching
Andrews R., 1995, Teaching and learning argument
Avvisati F., Effective teaching for improving students' motivation, curiosity, and self‐confidence in science: A comparative approach
Ball D. L., 2000, Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics, 83
Billig M., 1996, Arguing and thinking
Birman B. F. Le Floch K. C. Klekotka A. Ludwig M. Taylor J. Walters K. …Yoon K. S.(2007).State and Local Implementation of the “No Child Left Behind Act.”Volume II—Teacher Quality under“NCLB”: Interim Report.
Boaler J., 2008, Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School, The Teachers College Record, 110, 608, 10.1177/016146810811000302
Brown A. L., 1994, Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, 229
Cerini B., 2003, Student review of the science curriculum
Christodoulou A.(2011).The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: two case studies of teachers and their students. Unpublished PhD Thesis. King's College London.
Claxton G., 1988, Live and Learn: An introduction to the psychology of growth and change in everyday life
Csikszentmihalyi M., 1995, Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda, 67
Csikszentmihalyi M., 2000, Becoming adult: Preparing teenagers for the world of work
Damon W., 1989, Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education, International Journal of Educational Research, 5, 331
Dillon J., 2000, A study into the professional views and needs of science teachers in primary & secondary schools in England
Doise W., 1984, The social development of the intellect
Driver R., 1996, Young people's images of science
Dweck C., 2000, Self‐theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development (essays in social psychology)
Elder A. D., 2002, Personal epistemology, 347
Ennis R. H., 1985, Cornell critial thinking tests, level X and Z
Erduran S., 2008, Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom‐based research
Garet M., 2011, Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings After the Second Year of Implementation (NCEE 2011‐4024)
Gawande A., 2007, Better: A surgeon's notes on performance
Graff G. &Birkenstein C.(2007). They say/I say: The moves that matter in persuasive writing: WW Norton & Company Incorporated.
Harré R., 1984, The philosophies of science: An introductory survey
Hoban G., 2002, Teacher Learning for Educational Change
Howson C., 2006, Scientific reasoning: A Bayesian approach
Hynd C., 1986, The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts, Journal of Reading, 29, 440
Khine M., 2011, Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice and research
Lehrer J.(2010).The truth wears off. New Yorker 52–57.
Lord Sainsbury of Turville, 2007, The race to the top: A review of government's science and innovation policies
Loucks‐Horsley S., 2003, Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics
McLaughlin M. W., 1993, Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice
National Academies of Sciences, 2010, Rising above the gathering storm revisited
National Research Council, 2007, Taking science to school: Learning and teaching in grades K‐8
National Research Council, 2012, A framework for K‐12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas
Nystrand M., 1997, Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom
Osborne J. F., 2004, The IDEAS project
Paris S. G., 1998, Situated motivation and informal learning, Journal of Museum Education, 22, 22
Perry W. G., 1970, Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. A scheme
Petroski H., 1996, Engineering by design: How engineers get from thought to thing
Pontecorvo C., 1987, Learning and instruction: European Research in an International Context, 239
Pontecorvo C., 1993, Arguing and Reasoning in understanding historical topics, Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365, 10.1080/07370008.1993.9649030
Ratcliffe M., 2007, Evaluation of Twenty First Century Science GCSE Strand 3: The teaching of Twenty First Century Science GCSE, and teachers' and students' views of the course
Raven J., 2004, Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales
Renninger K. A., 1992, The role of interest in learning and development
Resnick L., From genes to context: New discoveries about learning from educational research and their applications
Shayer M. Wylam H. Adey P. &Kuchemann D.(1979).CSMS Science Reasoning Tasks. NFER Nelson Windsor.
Sisk‐Hilton S., 2009, Teaching and learning in public
Spillane J., 2006, Distributed leadership
Szu E., 2011, Perspectives on scientific argumentation, 55
Tytler R., 2008, Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary‐Secondary school transition. A review of the literature concerning supports and barriers to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics engagement at Primary‐Secondary transition. Commissioned by the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
van Lier L., 1996, Interaction in the language curriculum
Waring R., 2003, At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader, Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 130
Watson J. D., 1953, A Structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid., 171, 737
Weiss I. R., 2003, A Study of K–12 Mathematics and Science Education in the United States
Windschitl M.(2009).Cultivating 21st Century Skills in Science Learners: How Systems of Teacher Preparation and Professional Development will have to evolve. Paper presented at the National Academies of Science Workshop on 21st Century Skills.
Yoon K. S., 2007, Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement