Assessment of recovery: with special reference to a study with post‐operative cardiac patients

Journal of Advanced Nursing - Tập 6 Số 6 - Trang 435-445 - 1981
Jenifer Wilson‐Barnett1
1Lecturer in Nursing Studies, Chelsea College, University of London, Manresa Road, London SW3 6LX

Tóm tắt

The recovery process is dependent on many psychological and physical factors. In this paper recovery refers to major, short‐term illness often treated by surgery, which is not expected to result in permanent disability or handicap. Research reviewed which attempts to identify influences on recovery also shows how many patients are left with a degree of disability, usually for psychological reasons. It is suggested that the stress and impact of severe illness and surgery may have a long lasting, previously unrecognized effect.Nursing which studies the interaction of physical and psychological aspects of illness and care is seen as the most suitable discipline from which to assess recovery and identify risk factors. A study reported here with patients after coronary artery grafting, provides information on recovery and illustrates how many aspects of a patients’ experience may help or hinder this process. Data is obtained from patients’ interviews to give a wider, more humanistic evaluation of outcome than is usually employed for this type of surgery.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Barnes G.K., 1975, Changes in work status of patients undergoing saphenous vein by‐pass surgery (SVBS), Circulation, 51, 118

10.1016/0037-7856(68)90028-0

Croog S.H., 1977, The Heart Patient Recovers

European Coronary Surgery Study Group, 1980, Prospective randomised study of coronary artery by‐pass surgery in stable angina factors, Lancet, 491

10.1136/bmj.1.6162.549-b

10.1176/ajp.137.12.1591

Hellerstein H.K., 1958, Introduction and re‐education in the rehabilitation of the cardiac patient, American Heart Journal, 56, 425

JohnsonM.(1978)Assessing Recovery from Surgery. Paper given atBritish Psychological Society Annual Conference New York.

Lancet, 1979, Angina: the treatment revolution, Lancet, 1167

Lawrie G.M., Results of Coronary Bypass more than 5 years after operation in 434 patients, American Journal of Cardiology, 40, 665, 10.1016/0002-9149(77)90180-1

10.1016/S0146-2806(76)80009-6

10.1136/bmj.1.6025.1577

10.1161/01.CIR.57.3.405

Mendola W.F., 1979, Quality of life and coronary artery bypass surgery patients, Social Science and Medicine, 13, 457

10.1056/NEJM197507032930104

10.1136/bmj.1.6161.439

10.1016/0002-8703(79)90329-6

PepperJ.(1980)Coronary bypass grafting. On Call January 10th 8–9.

10.3109/00048677509159839

10.1016/0022-3999(79)90069-2

Porritt D., 1979, The Stress of Illness – Research Instruments

Preston T.A., 1977, Coronary Artery Surgery: A Critical Review

10.1001/jama.236.4.361

Rosillo R.H., 1971, Correlation of psychologic variables and progress in physical rehabilitation: 3. Ego functions and Defensive and Adaptive mechanisms, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 52, 15

10.1136/bmj.282.6262.451

RutterB.M.(1978)Psychological Aspects of Chronic Bronchitis.Ph.D. thesis. University of London.

Schillar E., 1976, Return to work after a myocardial infarction evaluation of planned rehabilitation and of a predictive rating scale, Medical Journal of Australia, 3, 859, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1976.tb141124.x

10.1136/bmj.2.6153.1680

Warren M.D., 1977, Rehabilitation Today

10.1136/bmj.2.6197.1028

10.1016/0010-440X(79)90025-7

Wilson‐Barnett J., 1977, Patients Emotional reactions to Hospitalisation

Wintner I., 1976, Psychological Approach to the Rehabilitation of Coronary Patients

World Health Organization, 1980, International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps